diy solar

diy solar

Solar Panels being clipped /limited on Inverter Input

First pic:

4.03 kW PV, of which:
0.01 from battery
1.27 to load
2.33 to grid

So the full 3.6 kW to grid and load, battery is just sitting fully charged while there would appear to be a 15% loss of panel output in the system. That's a lot of loss, so much that I'd possibly consider that (partly) a measurement timing error. Hard to say as I am not familiar with exactly what those charts are showing (e.g. momentary snapshots, or averages over an interval, or a mix of both).

Second pic:

4470 W of PV, of which:
3548 to battery
252 to load
493 to grid

So system losses of about 10% of PV output. Again if that is snapshot data it might be just a timing thing rather than actual losses.

Or measurement error.

In any case, the inverter is now showing it is capable of supplying 3.6 kW AC to loads + additional capacity to the battery. It's also showing priority of PV supply being to i. loads, ii. battery, iii. grid. Glad to read it is performing as it should.
They are not system losses, it is clipping. The inverter can only produce 3.6kW AC. If it has 4kW of DC coming from the PV there will be 400W left over that could go to the battery if it wasn't full. But it is full so it's clipped.
 
They are not system losses, it is clipping. The inverter can only produce 3.6kW AC. If it has 4kW of DC coming from the PV there will be 400W left over that could go to the battery if it wasn't full. But it is full so it's clipped.
The graph says 4.03 kW are being generated by the PV array.

No monitoring system can show you production which is not generated.

If the battery was full and PV was being clipped, it would be clipped to 3.6 kW. But it's not, so where is the spare 400 W going?

To suggest that the 400 W just disappears into thin air breaks the first law of thermodynamics.
 
The graph says 4.03 kW are being generated by the PV array.

No monitoring system can show you production which is not generated.

If the battery was full and PV was being clipped, it would be clipped to 3.6 kW. But it's not, so where is the spare 400 W going?

To suggest that the 400 W just disappears into thin air breaks the first law of thermodynamics.
But that's exactly what MPPT does. It samples output and applies the required resistance to extract most power from PV. Presumably it does this by checking the voltage from each string and making some assumptions. So it's possible for it to only use 3.6kW but know that 4.03kW are potentially available without having to use the full 4.03kW.
 
Where do you get 177 W?

1.27 kW to load + 2.33 kW to grid = 3.6 kW of AC output.
The PV is generating 4.03 kW.
The battery is minimal (-0.01kW).

So 4.03 kW of PV is supplying 3.6 kW of load.
That's 0.43 kW lost somewhere.
I'm referring to the quote that referenced my system, you didnt expand the picture I was referring to.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230209-170053_Samsung Internet.jpg
    Screenshot_20230209-170053_Samsung Internet.jpg
    169.6 KB · Views: 3
Go read up on MPPT before you dismiss what I am saying. There are apparently multiple strategies used to optimise power output but they all require the system to know what the panels are doing without applying full load.
This is not about MPPT algorithms. That's a complete red herring.

This is about the DC power output from the PV array, as measured by the inverter. If 4 kW is being generated by the PV array, then it has to go somewhere.
 
I'm referring to the quote that referenced my system, you didnt expand the picture I was referring to.

Ah, you were talking about this one below from an earlier post, where there is a missing 177 W:

Here I'd a picture of my system now getting 4.5kWh

Rather the one skylink posted in this post below:

Where there is a missing 400 W (in the first image).
 
This is not about MPPT algorithms. That's a complete red herring.

This is about the DC power output from the PV array, as measured by the inverter. If 4 kW is being generated by the PV array, then it has to go somewhere.
My point was that it's possible for the inverter to know that the PV is currently capable of generating 4kW without actually using it as this is exactly what MPPT does. It doesn't have to go somewhere if it isn't actually being generated.
 
My point was that it's possible for the inverter to know that the PV is currently capable of generating 4kW without actually using it as this is exactly what MPPT does. It doesn't have to go somewhere if it isn't actually being generated.
To get Watt reading there must be current flow through a load some where, you can have Voltage present at the power source but if no current flow then there will be no Power, to have a measured power of 4KW, that means there is current flow some where.
 
To get Watt reading there must be current flow through a load some where, you can have Voltage present at the power source but if no current flow then there will be no Power, to have a measured power of 4KW, that means there is current flow some where.
My point is that the inverter has an MPPT of 7kW and it can tell what the potential output of the PV is without using the full load. It's not a massive stretch to assume that they could display that potential power output on the screen even if it is only using half of it. The alternative is that this unit is soaking up 400W which I doubt.
 
My point is that the inverter has an MPPT of 7kW and it can tell what the potential output of the PV is without using the full load. It's not a massive stretch to assume that they could display that potential power output on the screen even if it is only using half of it. The alternative is that this unit is soaking up 400W which I doubt.
Sorry but there is no input to a MPPT that tells it potential power from the panels. It uses what it finds up to the limit of its charge current output if any load exists. Panels do not generate power without a load. If you are getting a reading for power than the equation of W=VA must balance.
 
Sorry but there is no input to a MPPT that tells it potential power from the panels. It uses what it finds up to the limit of its charge current output if any load exists. Panels do not generate power without a load. If you are getting a reading for power than the equation of W=VA must balance.
1676204962047.png

As I said earlier, just by looking at the voltage you can calculate what the potential output of the PV is. You don't need to be drawing 4kW to measure 4kW.
 
View attachment 134463

As I said earlier, just by looking at the voltage you can calculate what the potential output of the PV is. You don't need to be drawing 4kW to measure 4kW.
Still incorrect. In your quote "the controller measures incremental current and voltage changes" You can not measure current without a load. Without a load the panels output Voc. Panel voltage under a load changes and therefore the MPPT can use this to calculate the point where voltage and current create the most wattage.
 
Still incorrect. In your quote "the controller measures incremental current and voltage changes" You can not measure current without a load. Without a load the panels output Voc. Panel voltage under a load changes and therefore the MPPT can use this to calculate the point where voltage and current create the most wattage.
Okay, you are correct then. The inverter is just losing >400W. Happy?
 
Still incorrect. In your quote "the controller measures incremental current and voltage changes" You can not measure current without a load. Without a load the panels output Voc. Panel voltage under a load changes and therefore the MPPT can use this to calculate the point where voltage and current create the most wattage.
You've completely ignored the bit that says "The current from the array can be expressed as a function of the voltage". A lot of clever people here all willing to accept that the inverter is soaking up >400W continuously. Quite impressive for a unit without a fan.
 
You've completely ignored the bit that says "The current from the array can be expressed as a function of the voltage". A lot of clever people here all willing to accept that the inverter is soaking up >400W continuously. Quite impressive for a unit without a fan.
Let me try once more. W=VA
The statement that "current from the array" can off course be explained as a function of the voltage. See the equation above.

I really wish people would stop using the word "clip" to suggest that power from panels is being removed somehow. Potentail power from panels is only relevant if you load them. Rated power for panels depends on STC (standard test conditions of solar irradiance) and is a variable if STC does not happen.

For instance if your MPPT charger has a maximum charge current of 10a at 14.5v. That equals 145w. It will only load the panels till it achieves this (plus internal power conversion loss). The panels may be capable (potential) in full sun to provide 1000w. They however only see a 145w draw. The MPPT loads the panels but it does not care that there is 1000w-145w=855w potential not being used. Nor does it read out to the user "hey buddy you have 855w available." it does not know that since it does not need more than 145w. In order to know that it takes more than a voltage amount since voltage without amperage does not equal watts.

If your unit is accurately measuring 400w more than it is delivering to a load than it is losing it internally.
 
Let me try once more. W=VA
The statement that "current from the array" can off course be explained as a function of the voltage. See the equation above.

I really wish people would stop using the word "clip" to suggest that power from panels is being removed somehow. Potentail power from panels is only relevant if you load them. Rated power for panels depends on STC (standard test conditions of solar irradiance) and is a variable if STC does not happen.

For instance if your MPPT charger has a maximum charge current of 10a at 14.5v. That equals 145w. It will only load the panels till it achieves this (plus internal power conversion loss). The panels may be capable (potential) in full sun to provide 1000w. They however only see a 145w draw. The MPPT loads the panels but it does not care that there is 1000w-145w=855w potential not being used. Nor does it read out to the user "hey buddy you have 855w available." it does not know that since it does not need more than 145w. In order to know that it takes more than a voltage amount since voltage without amperage does not equal watts.

If your unit is accurately measuring 400w more than it is delivering to a load than it is losing it internally.
I'm emailing Sunsynk right now to let them know that their inverter efficiency is actually only 87% and not the 98% they claim. They will need to update their spec sheets.
 
I'm emailing Sunsynk right now to let them know that their inverter efficiency is actually only 87% and not the 98% they claim. They will need to update their spec sheets.
I doubt you will get them to do that based on your testing of your unit. I expect their testing for their product of 98% efficiency was accurate (whatever the basic test conditions were).

They might (if they have good customer service) ask you to send your unit in for testing/repair.
 
Back
Top