Recent content by klystron

Then you know that while Trump has lost some civil cases he has not yet been "convicted" of anything, and that using the term "convicted" to describe the outcome of a civil case demonstrates ignorance when it comes to the justice system in the US.

Do you understand the difference between a civil case and a criminal case, and that the legal term "convicted" only applies to criminal cases? It certainly appears that you do not.

Please cite the case, keeping in mind that the legal term "convicted" means: "having been declared guilty of a criminal offense by the verdict of a jury or the decision of a judge."

LOL at someone commenting on this who apparently has no idea who sets the value of property for purposes of granting a loan, or for purposes of assessing property taxes. Hint: it isn't the owner in either case.

You can compare GE images of the bridge with satellite and other images of the ship after the collision and see that the ship was traveling southeast when it hit the bridge. It never traveled under the bridge. As to other comments regarding the use of the rudder during power loss... a ship's...

It applies in every state that has it in their laws, but I doubt that you even understand what it means or how it applies. One of the things it does not do is give one unlimited authority to use deadly force.

Summary of SOTU speech...

Making entry isn't enough unless it's your home or in most states, your car. To be lawful, you must "fear imminent death or great bodily harm". She was unarmed, and murdered by a coward.

Now, suddenly, you have no problem with guessing what a court (sic) would decide. You should review the legal requirements for lawful use of deadly force in the states where the killings took place.

Both cases involved improper if not illegal use of deadly force. So, if you're going to excuse one you have to excuse both. Personally, I am against summary executions. By the way... what do you think would have followed had a white person killed an unarmed black man breaking into one of the...

I wouldn't rule it out.

That one is on the Biden administration and their colossal ineptitude and incompetence.

If you thought that there was any chance that the SCOTUS would uphold the Colorado Supreme Court decision, guess which drink is for you...

This should answer your question. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-rules-unanimously-for-trump-in-colorado-ballot-disqualification-dispute