Search results

Then you know that while Trump has lost some civil cases he has not yet been "convicted" of anything, and that using the term "convicted" to describe the outcome of a civil case demonstrates ignorance when it comes to the justice system in the US.

Do you understand the difference between a civil case and a criminal case, and that the legal term "convicted" only applies to criminal cases? It certainly appears that you do not.

Please cite the case, keeping in mind that the legal term "convicted" means: "having been declared guilty of a criminal offense by the verdict of a jury or the decision of a judge."

LOL at someone commenting on this who apparently has no idea who sets the value of property for purposes of granting a loan, or for purposes of assessing property taxes. Hint: it isn't the owner in either case.

You can compare GE images of the bridge with satellite and other images of the ship after the collision and see that the ship was traveling southeast when it hit the bridge. It never traveled under the bridge. As to other comments regarding the use of the rudder during power loss... a ship's...

It applies in every state that has it in their laws, but I doubt that you even understand what it means or how it applies. One of the things it does not do is give one unlimited authority to use deadly force.

Summary of SOTU speech...

Making entry isn't enough unless it's your home or in most states, your car. To be lawful, you must "fear imminent death or great bodily harm". She was unarmed, and murdered by a coward.

Now, suddenly, you have no problem with guessing what a court (sic) would decide. You should review the legal requirements for lawful use of deadly force in the states where the killings took place.

Both cases involved improper if not illegal use of deadly force. So, if you're going to excuse one you have to excuse both. Personally, I am against summary executions. By the way... what do you think would have followed had a white person killed an unarmed black man breaking into one of the...

I wouldn't rule it out.

That one is on the Biden administration and their colossal ineptitude and incompetence.

If you thought that there was any chance that the SCOTUS would uphold the Colorado Supreme Court decision, guess which drink is for you...

This should answer your question. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-rules-unanimously-for-trump-in-colorado-ballot-disqualification-dispute

Isn't there an immigration thread?

There is no way the SCOTUS can allow the ballot removal to stand. Not only does it violate our basic judicial process and individual rights to due process and presumption of innocence, but it would open the door to red states removing Biden because they each decide on their own that he is unfit...

Hate always consumes the hater, never the hated.

You are not judging Ken - this is a legal question. You are confused about the process and the difference between committing a crime and being convicted of having committed a crime. Until you understand that difference there is nothing further for us to discuss. In your world [as you have...

If nobody sees Ken do this, has he committed a crime? That is a yes/no question but I suspect you will have trouble answering it.

I am trying desperately to understand your position, but I think I have been unsuccessful because we have different definitions for certain terms. Because of that, there can be no meaningful discussion.

Does that mean that they haven't committed a crime?

I think you are confusing committing a crime vs being convicted of committing a crime. You appear to say that if you break the law but are not caught and convicted then you haven't committed a crime - I hope you're not teaching your children or grandchildren that. In the case of illegal...

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/camarota-testimony.pdf From the link: Using the National Academies’ estimate of immigrants’ net fiscal impact by education level, we estimate that the lifetime fiscal drain (taxes paid minus...

Oh, you will. It will happen just as soon as it affects you, and it is sure to affect you because you and your offspring will be paying for it all for most of your lives.

That's how the world used to work, and it wasn't invented by white Europeans.

No, they are illegal immigrants the moment they break the law and commit a crime.

I believe that your thinking is affected by the fact that you have not been negatively impacted by the invasion on a personal level... yet.

You need to stop parroting the leftist lies... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Title 8 of the U.S. Code identifies federal criminal offenses pertaining to immigration and nationality, including the following two...

No, that is a label the left created to put lipstick on a pig and soften reality - the correct term is illegal. They [democrats] excel at creative labelling as in "Affordable Care Act" and "Inflation Reduction Act", etc., etc. where the label is typically the opposite of the nature of the item.

Last one I remember was in 2008 under Obama. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_Allowance_Rebate_System

As to inciting violence... Chuck Schumer in 2020 regarding a SCOTUS ruling: “You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” Maxine Waters in 2018 regarding the Trump administration: "If you see anybody...

AI is BS. It's a new marketing word for the same old thing. We have a very long way to go before there is any actual AI capability out there.

I call that "theater". Trump is famous for his over-the-top statements.