Token Civilian
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2022
- Messages
- 5
I'm planning on adding some more briefcase type panels to my Inergy Flex 1500 system. Intended use is as backup for the fridge / freezer / device charging / basic lighting during power outages. Secondary use will be dispersed car camping, where power is desired, hence the desire for briefcase style panels. Note that I'm "sunk" into this system, so can't afford to switch to one of the newer systems (Bluetti, etc). Just looking to max it out, as I have it set up.
For reference, the max input voltage on the Inergy is 90vdc. The "factory" Ascent panels the system came with are 4 x 100 watt in series (Voc = 17.8/ea for nominal max before temp adjust of 4x17.8=71.2). These are $250 / unit.
I have a 2nd battery (~2.1kwh total system capacity), plus the MPPT unit with 2 more solar inputs, for a total of 3. Per the system specs, it's 90 VDC and unlimited amps on all 3 of the inputs.
I'm looking at the Rich 100 and 200 watt briefcase panels. Also in the running are Renology 100 and 200 watt briefcase panels. There's also a Harbor Freight 100 watt briefcase panel.
I have a question into Inergy on doing a series/parallel input to up the wattage / amps without going over the 90Vdc max, so don't yet know what my options are in this direction. Note - all costs will be rounded to whole dollars.
Rich Solar: 100 watt, VOC 22.6, $200 / unit. 200 watt, VOC 22.8, $400 / unit. Either of these will be limited to 3S to stay under the 90 volt max, considering temperature effects.
Renology: 100 watt, VOC 24.3, $239 / unit. 200 watt, VOC 21.8, $390 / unit. Likewise, these are 3s limited.
Harbor Freight: 100 watt, VOC 21.5, $159 / unit. These are borderline 4s, but I'd probably limit to 3s to say safe. Note these are SAE connectors while the others are MC4.
So far, the Inergy 100 watt are out on price. The Renology 100 watt are out on the same metric as the 200's have 2x the nominal and less than 2x the price.
That leaves the the Rich 100 and 200 watt, the Renology 200 watt and the Harbor Freight 100 watt. What are folks opinions on these, relative to each other? Harbor Freight is the cheapest....but I worry about HF's overall reputation, plus a SAE connector vs MC4.
If I 3s the Rich or HF 100 watt panels, on the 2 additional inputs I have, that takes my system to 1000 watts nominal solar input (400+300+300). If I did 3s on either the Rich or Renology 200 watt panels, I'd have 400 + 600+600) = 1600 input watts, nominal.
If Inergy comes back and says 3s2p is good, I could go as high as 400+1200+1200 = 2800 nominal with the 200 watt panels.
Being in the Pacific Northwest brings a couple considerations - 1, the power goes out in winter (like it did 2 days ago and is still out for 60k people in the county) when days are short and nights are long. It is also cloudy a lot. Both of which tend to limit potential total watt-hours of production. To that end, I'm thinking more nominal watts of panels is better, as I could (hopefully) both charge the batteries AND run the fridge / freezer, even with limited production. Renology 200 and Rich 100 and 200 are close enough on price per watt such that isn't a big discriminator between the two. But I'm biased, as noted, toward more watts, so unless there is something compelling about the Rich 100 or the HF (which is a far better price), I'm leaning toward the 200's. Are there other options for 100 or 200 watt briefcase type panels I've missed?
Anyways, opinions please on the best panels given the above. Thanks.
For reference, the max input voltage on the Inergy is 90vdc. The "factory" Ascent panels the system came with are 4 x 100 watt in series (Voc = 17.8/ea for nominal max before temp adjust of 4x17.8=71.2). These are $250 / unit.
I have a 2nd battery (~2.1kwh total system capacity), plus the MPPT unit with 2 more solar inputs, for a total of 3. Per the system specs, it's 90 VDC and unlimited amps on all 3 of the inputs.
I'm looking at the Rich 100 and 200 watt briefcase panels. Also in the running are Renology 100 and 200 watt briefcase panels. There's also a Harbor Freight 100 watt briefcase panel.
I have a question into Inergy on doing a series/parallel input to up the wattage / amps without going over the 90Vdc max, so don't yet know what my options are in this direction. Note - all costs will be rounded to whole dollars.
Rich Solar: 100 watt, VOC 22.6, $200 / unit. 200 watt, VOC 22.8, $400 / unit. Either of these will be limited to 3S to stay under the 90 volt max, considering temperature effects.
Renology: 100 watt, VOC 24.3, $239 / unit. 200 watt, VOC 21.8, $390 / unit. Likewise, these are 3s limited.
Harbor Freight: 100 watt, VOC 21.5, $159 / unit. These are borderline 4s, but I'd probably limit to 3s to say safe. Note these are SAE connectors while the others are MC4.
So far, the Inergy 100 watt are out on price. The Renology 100 watt are out on the same metric as the 200's have 2x the nominal and less than 2x the price.
That leaves the the Rich 100 and 200 watt, the Renology 200 watt and the Harbor Freight 100 watt. What are folks opinions on these, relative to each other? Harbor Freight is the cheapest....but I worry about HF's overall reputation, plus a SAE connector vs MC4.
If I 3s the Rich or HF 100 watt panels, on the 2 additional inputs I have, that takes my system to 1000 watts nominal solar input (400+300+300). If I did 3s on either the Rich or Renology 200 watt panels, I'd have 400 + 600+600) = 1600 input watts, nominal.
If Inergy comes back and says 3s2p is good, I could go as high as 400+1200+1200 = 2800 nominal with the 200 watt panels.
Being in the Pacific Northwest brings a couple considerations - 1, the power goes out in winter (like it did 2 days ago and is still out for 60k people in the county) when days are short and nights are long. It is also cloudy a lot. Both of which tend to limit potential total watt-hours of production. To that end, I'm thinking more nominal watts of panels is better, as I could (hopefully) both charge the batteries AND run the fridge / freezer, even with limited production. Renology 200 and Rich 100 and 200 are close enough on price per watt such that isn't a big discriminator between the two. But I'm biased, as noted, toward more watts, so unless there is something compelling about the Rich 100 or the HF (which is a far better price), I'm leaning toward the 200's. Are there other options for 100 or 200 watt briefcase type panels I've missed?
Anyways, opinions please on the best panels given the above. Thanks.