i_papp
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2022
- Messages
- 12
GEL batteries need a long absorbtion period where the charge voltage is held constant at the absorbtion voltage of 14.2 volts maximum. The default absorbtion period for Epever is 2 hours, this is lower than recomended for some GEL batteries under cyclic operation.
The manufactures JYC, recomended charge voltages of 14.4 to 15 volts, these are higher than some other manufactures recomend for GEL, Epever default charge voltage for example is 14.2 volts for GEL .
It's suggested by some that GEL batteries should be charged at 14.2 or 14.1 volts to reduce early failure. (2.35 volts per cell )
Without knowing the typical solar yield compared to daily load its difficult to suggest the batteries were
under charged. For example is there shading on the panels for some part of the day?, is the inverter idle current accounted for? are there often several days of poor solar input, cloud/rain?
Assuming for most of the time the only load is 5 watts at the battery, it's possible at the daily charge at 14.4 volts , the batteries were over charged. Epever don't have variable absorbtion period so even after a slight overnight discharge the battery was subjected to a prolonged charge.
My guess is the charge voltage of 14.4 caused degradation despite the manufactures advice for this value.
Mike
We are in the weekend house only when the weather is nice, and that means sunlight to charge the batteries.
The only thing that could happen is that the fridge is on while we are not there.
The daily consumption of the fridge is up to 350 Wh, so it would take ~4 days to reach 50% DoD.
And if discharge would be prolonged, sooner or later the inverter would switch off. But that never happened.
Since I couldn't explain a deep discharge of the batteries, neither my calculation indicates that this is the case, currently the too-high charging voltage seems the most plausible cause.
It means that setting the boost voltage for cyclic use (or even higher than that) for a battery that is very rarely cycled degraded it. Honestly, I expected the SCC to adapt the charging process to the battery state, but now I realized that it just blindly forced the absorption for a fixed period of time (2 hours) at a too-high voltage. The degradation would have been less if I'd lowered the boost voltage to 14.1V or 14.2V.
Is this a good summary?
That makes me wonder - the lead-acid technology is so fragile that a 0.2V or 0.3V higher voltage can make such a difference?
Istvan.
PS: I hope the LiFePO4 battery will not suffer from this issue (Link)
Last edited: