diy solar

diy solar

California PCS

Exporting power from the batteries that was initially imported off the grid is not allowed.
That is true when a user receives SGIP funding in California and has to sign a paired storage agreement. I have not seen that language in my NEM agreement but that was for a GT system without batteries. Where have you seen that restriction or language?
 

Attachments

  • Export-Limit-Utility-Letter.pdf
    101.1 KB · Views: 12
I agree about the non-grid tie/backfeed.

Exporting power from the batteries that was initially imported off the grid is not allowed. They are trying to tighten up how you work Time of Use.
wow what crybabies
they should be glad other people are doing that lmao, makes them have to buy less batteries themselves
 
Does this limit the grid feeding from the batteries or from solar or both?

Can you submit the documentation for the PCS to the CEC for it?
The Luxpower which is the same as the 18k is on the list. PG&E is creating a road block out of this.
Yes same questions I have. Also, I have understood that the PCS certification is basically a mode that doesn't allow imported power to then be exported not a kw restriction (maybe this is an incorrect assumption). Also, is this restriction a kWh number or just max allowed kw to discharge to the grid?
 
Yes same questions I have. Also, I have understood that the PCS certification is basically a mode that doesn't allow imported power to then be exported not a kw restriction (maybe this is an incorrect assumption).
There are multiple PCS modes and some inverters only support one, others support multiple. You are correct that a lot of the PCS modes rule out the export of imported energy, but some are dumb like prohibiting all export from storage.

(Btw it’s more accurate to talk about imported and exported energy)

I’m not super convinced EG4 is taking this seriously yet. Is there a California based solar influencer that can help escalate this with them? The market here is kind of weird in that there is huge volume but few influencers, rather driven by big industry groups like CALSSA.

I’m reluctant to engage with a lot of mental and writing power with EG4 since I’m neither a customer nor an influencer/partner, so there’s little chance they’ll prioritize the discussion with me
 
Last edited:
I believe this has been solved with our Export Lock Form found here: https://eg4electronics.com/categories/inverters/eg4-18kpv-12lv-all-in-one-hybrid-inverter
It is not necessarily solved.

This form is for POCOs that limit export to 10kW threshold, etc. California generally does not bottleneck residential installs on export. I have 20kW-AC and PG&E didn’t bat an eye.

The problem is around controlling where the energy for the storage exports come from.

Now, if you are saying that locking the inverter to EG 10kW gets under the Rule21 threshold where PCS is exempt by one or more of the POCOs, then maybe.

Also in the first post it was said that the 18kpv does NOT show up as a derated inverter option in the interconnect agreement for limiting down to 10kW
 
Last edited:
So they are telling you what you can and can't do with the power you buy from them?
I don’t see a problem with limiting exports from imported power. You are not on a wholesale compensation rate, rather a subsidized retail rate. That retail export to import spread is a huge arbitrage opportunity

And it’s not in the same ballpark of energy export rights as for exporting your own solar. Your own solar is capped to a low level. Exporting what you imported is an order of magnitude more energy potential.
 
Not sure if I should go though with the install now or not.
Frankly I wouldn’t recommend it unless one of the top techs from EG4 sits down with a California customer with the most restrictive POCO, pushes it through end to end to PTO, and converts this to internal documentation.

And even with that proof, unless they clarify the documented CEC options, it could have been approved by a fluke, or it may not be applicable for the other two IOUs or for a MUD.
 
Do not ever order anything without interconnect pre approval and permits stamped.
I do not have interconnect approval other than my NEM 2.0 agreement from 2021 for my 8kW GT system. I do have permitted plans approved by the County for my SolArk 12k and four Pytes V5 batteries in an outdoor enclosure. It will be Rule 21 compliant but in Non Export mode so I do not intend to to apply for interconnection. There is a PG&E document entitled PG&E Back-Up Power Installation Guide {attached below} that says if I have it connected via a Break before Make device I am not required to apply for an interconnecton.
 

Attachments

  • Backup-Power-Installation-Guide.pdf
    200 KB · Views: 6
I do not have interconnect approval other than my NEM 2.0 agreement from 2021 for my 8kW GT system. I do have permitted plans approved by the County for my SolArk 12k and four Pytes V5 batteries in an outdoor enclosure. It will be Rule 21 compliant but in Non Export mode so I do not intend to to apply for interconnection. There is a PG&E document entitled PG&E Back-Up Power Installation Guide {attached below} that says if I have it connected via a Break before Make device I am not required to apply for an interconnecton.
That makes sense to me. However this PDF is kind of weird. The transfer method is orthogonal to the power source. I believe you can combine break before make with a high speed switch (though maybe not a mechanical one).

The PDF may make sense if they are targeting the 90% most common configs.
 
I believe you can combine break before make with a high speed switch (though maybe not a mechanical one).
Most all manual transfer switches Break before Make so that is all the is is necessary. Rule 21 does not say anything that I could find about limiting Export to only solar, but that language is clear in a NEM PS {Net Energy Metering Paired Storage} agreement which I assume one signs if they get SGIP funding or applies for a NEM PS. I do not know how NEM 3.0 ( also called NBT or Net Billing Tariff) affects that.
 
It says UL1008 transfer device is needed, I wonder if popular AIOs here with UL1741 or better actually qualify for that.

Anyway the PCS issue is super important, sort of want to stay focused on that. I think this thread could have a better title to make it more obvious that this is an 18kpv problem.
 
It says UL1008 transfer device is needed, I wonder if popular AIOs here with UL1741 or better actually qualify for that.
I believe a UL108 transfer device is automatic. In that case an interconnection agreement is required. A manual tranfer switch which is Break befoer Make, lets you skip the interconnection requirement according to that document, and that is the strategy I am using.
 
So they are telling you what you can and can't do with the power you buy from them?
You can do whatever you want (assuming it's legal) with the power you buy from them.

But they have VERY strict requirements on the power you sell back to them.

Which makes sense. After all, it's their money, their power lines and their grid.
 
Aside from the AHJ and utility approval, would anyone on here recommend against going with a Sol-Ark 15k and PowerPro batteries?
 
Aside from the AHJ and utility approval, would anyone on here recommend against going with a Sol-Ark 15k and PowerPro batteries?
Maybe worse support from SolArk and EG4 because it’s not a partnered battery so they’ll point fingers at each other instead of being incentivized to help.
 
Back
Top