The protest are probably rooted in scientific ignorance, as is most of the protests in this country. As radioactive nuclei go, tritium is the Labrador Retriever of radioactive elements.This one isn't an accident.
"People in the Hudson Valley are working to put a stop to current plans to discharge 1 million gallons of contaminated radioactive waste into the Hudson River from the Indian Point power plant."
Advocates demand plan to discharge radioactive waste into Hudson River from Indian Point power plant be stopped
Health and environmental experts met with state lawmakers and Hudson Valley residents on Thursday night for a second virtual forum.hudsonvalley.news12.com
Thanks for the education. I'll share it with my buddy who told me about it, he's south of the Hudson.The protest are probably rooted in scientific ignorance, as is most of the protests in this country. As radioactive nuclei go, tritium is the Labrador Retriever of radioactive elements.
It has a half-life of something like 10 years and no one seems to complain about high concentrations of it in their glow-in-the-dark watches or rifle scopes, or the plethora of other applications where it's used. (including children's toys)
Tritium is a beta emitter with a ridiculously low decay energy.. so low, that common Geiger counters are not sensitive enough to detect it. You would have to actually ingest the tritium in order for it to do any harm to you because it's beta energy is so low it is not capable of penetrating anything.. Heck, it probably can't even travel but a few feet through normal air.
Tritium is produced naturally in our atmosphere from cosmic radiation..
People are dumb. Their protests are based on fear, which is based on ignorance and stupidity.
Thanks for the education. I'll share it with my buddy who told me about it, he's south of the Hudson.
If it's in the water couldn't it be ingested by humans whose water comes from the Hudson? What about risk to aquatic life?
Radiation effects are not cumulative. Exposure is cumulative, the effects are not that simple. Even the exposure isn't that simple.What you conveniently forget is that radiation effects are cumulative. (This is one of the explanations why the doctor steps out when they take your xray).
Vaccines people are forced to take since a week old? I have a child and she was not "forced to take since a week old". I have no idea what you're talking about here as no one has ever forced any vaccines on us.What is also important is that something like a spillage is going to be yet another factor in addition to many other factors that are within and without our control (crappy processed food people consume, polluted air people breath, vaccines people are forced to take since week old, constant EMF that people are constantly being bombarded with (key word here is constantly - the judgment on EMF is still very much unknown and wont be known for decades, and that is if they are truthful).
We call that Darwinism.Either way, all of these things have impact on health, and since each person has different genetics, some people break sooner than others, while some (very few) truly appear to be "immune" (Or maybe they are just balancing all the straws where one can break the camel's back).
There are a lot of things we don't know, but fortunately, the benefits of vaccinations and the effects of electromagnetic radiation are not among them.There is a lot of things we don't know and based on the last few years a lot of "Accepted truths" (even "scientific ones") need to be entirely reevaluated, but I bet you many people do not want to be guinea pigs in this experiment.
Constant EMF (I'm assuming EMF = Electromagnetic Frequency)?
There are a lot of things we don't know <snip> the effects of electromagnetic radiation are not among them.
Same thing.. the two are intrinsic.In the context of the original post I suspect he means Electromagnetic Field(s). Surprised you didn't know that.
Of course more study is needed.. research and study are always a good thing regardless of how much we know. The phrase "more study is needed" is not a position, its a philosophy.That will be news to the NIH and other government agencies who currently take the position that more study is needed in this area.
Same thing.. the two are intrinsic.
But I think it's worth mentioning that after a billion years of evolution on this planet, all the while being bombarded by and being within electromagnetic fields, what is it that "more study" is looking for?
I think by making this statement you have pretty much invalidated every single argument on this subject. Confirms to me that as we say "you hear the bells, but dont know who is ringing ).Same thing.. the two are intrinsic.
Of course more study is needed.. research and study are always a good thing regardless of how much we know. The phrase "more study is needed" is not a position, its a philosophy.
But I think it's worth mentioning that after a billion years of evolution on this planet, all the while being bombarded by and being within electromagnetic fields, what is it that "more study" is looking for?
In fact, without those electromagnetic fields, humans wouldn't be here to discuss them, and strangely enough, all objects radiate their own EMF.
Not really the same thing - the field is the "thing" and its frequency is a characteristic, and since EMFs exist across the entire frequency spectrum all frequencies are "electromagnetic frequencies".
Too much of almost anything can cause harm. Your body contains water, you must consume water to live, but too much water and you drown and die.Perhaps the study would be looking for the field strength levels and associated frequencies at which tissue damage might occur. I can tell you from personal experience working with very high strength EMFs in the 50 kHz range that you can definitely feel a change when the field is present that extends for a minute or two after the exposure; in my case it was a tightening of all joints in the hand that was exposed similar to arthritis but without the pain. Of course, the strength of these fields cannot be compared to anything that you might be exposed to naturally or otherwise in normal life, and I suspect that the fields generated by current modern day electronics and high tension lines are no where near strong enough to do damage.
Totally not.You are splitting hairs. You can't have one without the other.
Too much of almost anything can cause harm. Your body contains water, you must consume water to live, but too much water and you drown and die.
We live in a gravitational well, but if that well were to increase by a factor of 10, we'd all die.
Right.. I'm an electrical engineer, and after 30 years I have retired.. and I don't know what I'm talking about.I think by making this statement you have pretty much invalidated every single argument on this subject. Confirms to me that as we say "you hear the bells, but dont know who is ringing ).
So tell me, what about the 5G do you think causes damage, and what is the functional mechanism you believe causes the damage?You are comparing apples to oranges. Take a simple EMF meter. Measure background EMF level. (the one you are bombarded with from natural sources such as the sun).
Now take the same EMF meter and measure it next to your WIFI access point.
Again, it is unknown how much EMF is detrimental to our health, and its important to remember that not all EMF is the same even. The one I would personally be most worried about is mmw 5G, this is the 50-60GHZ frequency one. There has been no long term effects study, but initial "notes from the field" are not very reassuring, enough for me to start questioning these things.
The ridiculous and false nature of that statement is mind boggling.Another thing to keep in mind, is that for the first time in history we are under continuous exposure
There seems to be a logical disconnect here. I gave you an example of how too much of anything can be harmful and you went straight to a rationalization comparing the statistical probability of a brick falling on your head.Totally not.
You are being intellectually dishonest after you have been called on posting inaccurate (BS) statement.
Complete nonsense. This is like saying if a brick falls on your head right now, you will die. You surely will, but what are the chances of a brick falling on your head RIGHT NOW (unless you are at the construction site?).
Yes, my dad can beat up your dad. I think you have read about electrical engineering in a kid's book, as your level of understanding of basic concepts is roughly on the level of my 4 year old (Mixing up EM Frequency with EM Field).Right.. I'm an electrical engineer, and after 30 years I have retired.. and I don't know what I'm talking about.
So tell me, what about the 5G do you think causes damage, and what is the functional mechanism you believe causes the damage?
The ridiculous and false nature of that statement is mind boggling.
ROFLMAO.. Ok. I'm done.