China is clearly in a unconventional war on the USA, Why is it being ignored?

What do you know of this?

Only what you have told us, so far.
So, nothing yet. lol

timselectric said:

Only what you have told us, so far.
So, nothing yet. lol

Click to expand...

So I take it you do not know of a port in Mexico that is owned by China that supplies "base" materials, ships them to a town where there are 2000 China nationals making fentanyl and pressing into counterfeit pills then distributed by the most powerful cartel in Mexico?

Or perhaps the fact that Tiktok has access to you phone info, or that they choose what you see based on the info gathered from you?

grizzzman said:

So I take it you do not know of a port in Mexico that is owned by China that supplies "base" materials, ships them to a town where there are 2000 China nationals making fentanyl and pressing into counterfeit pills then distributed by the most powerful cartel in Mexico?

Click to expand...

Nope

Or that they help fund movies then have the script rewritten at their instance? An example of this "The martin" Where China saved the day?

grizzzman said:

Or perhaps the fact that Tiktok has access to you phone info, or that they choose what you see based on the info gathered from you?

Click to expand...

Not my phone.

Or the attempted Cyber attack of the Texas power grid?

No tiktok on my phone.

grizzzman said:

Or that they help fund movies then have the script rewritten at their instance? An example of this "The martin" Where China saved the day?

Click to expand...

Movies are for entertainment.
I don't take them seriously.

grizzzman said:

Or the attempted Cyber attack of the Texas power grid?

Click to expand...

Since it was only attempted.
Congratulations to Texas for taking care of business.

Or the China spy balloon that was allowed to cross most of the USA and run lazy circles around military bases including ones with nuclear ordnance while using USA based Internet to send gathered data back to China?

grizzzman said:

Or the China spy balloon that was allowed to cross most of the USA and run lazy circles around military bases including ones with nuclear ordnance while using USA based Internet to send gathered data back to China?

Click to expand...

That one is on the Biden administration and their colossal ineptitude and incompetence.

klystron said:

That one is on the Biden administration and their colossal ineptitude and incompetence.

Click to expand...

You believe it is just incompetence? And not by design?

grizzzman said:

You believe it is just incompetence? And not by design?

Click to expand...

I wouldn't rule it out.

klystron said:

That one is on the Biden administration and their colossal ineptitude and incompetence.

Click to expand...

Unfortunately think a lot of ppl look at willful knowingly as incompetence. Anything of that nature on purpose would be called Treason in most cases. Lot of the Right say “incompetence.”
Some say he didn’t say and do what he did. 2020 proves he did what he said and did.

China’s biggest weapon is one of our own inside job

China: The World’s First Technate​

Technocracy is a system of dictatorial rule based upon the allocation of resources. In 1938, Technocrat Magazine described it as follows:

“Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.”

Click to expand...

Rather like feudalism, resource distribution is controlled by a centralised authority, who mete out access to resources dependent upon the citizen’s behaviour. This is the preferred “social credit” method of population control in China. An increasing number of China’s citizens need a good social credit score in order to access resources and society.

The whole system is administered by central planners within a subordinate policy body to the State Council called the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). They oversee a data mining, collection and analysis operation on an immense scale.

Without any democratic oversight, technocracy in China stipulates that the people trust the edicts of the technocrats. They are required to believe, or at least publicly state, that decisions are taken in the interest of the general good. If they don’t comply the Technate can use its surveillance systems to identify offenders and punish them for their selfish behaviour.

In its 2014 document Planning A Social Credit System, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) spoke of their intention to “construct a social credit environment of honesty, self-discipline, trustworthiness, and mutual trust.” They announced:

“Our country is currently in a key period of economic and social transformation. Stakeholder entities are more diversified [. . .] the forms of social organization and management are undergoing deep changes. Comprehensively advancing the establishment of a social credit system is an effective method of strengthening societal creditworthiness, promoting mutual trust in society, and reducing social contradictions, and it is an urgent requirement for strengthening and innovating in social governance. [. . .] The establishment of a social credit system is an important foundation for comprehensively implementing the scientific viewpoint of development. [. . .] Accelerating and advancing the establishment of the social credit system is an important precondition for promoting the optimized allocation of resources.”

Click to expand...

This is the epitome of technocracy. It is a monoculture where all are subservient to the technocratic state.

There are two arms to the social credit system in China. Both individual citizens and corporations are given a rating based upon the aggregation and analysis of the data collected from their lives and business practices.

Approximately 80% of China’s provinces have rolled out some form of the social credit system. While still in development, individual surveillance and control systems are most pervasive in the cities. People can either be placed on a “blacklist,” limiting their freedoms, or a “redlist” permitting them to engage in society in a manner deemed appropriate by the Technate. Punishments include denial of access to public transport, refused payments, public shaming or restricted employment opportunities.

Nationally, the focus has been on constructing the Corporate Social Credit System (CSCS). Millions of businesses in China are required to demonstrate their commitment to the general good, as defined by the Technate. As long as they do, they will be allowed to prosper. If they don’t obey, they won’t.

For numerous reasons, explored by Prof. Liu Yongmou in the Benefits of Technocracy in China, the Chinese political system lent itself well to the creation of the world’s first Technate:

“In China today, there exists a more favourable attitude toward technocracy than is found elsewhere. [. . .] Insofar as it is scientism applied to politics, the Chinese tend to have a positive attitude toward technocracy. [. . .] Technocracy also fits with the Chinese tradition of elite politics and the ideal, to reference a Confucian phrase, of ‘exalting the virtuous and the capable.’ [. . .] knowledge was more important than the representation of the interests of those being governed. [. . .] Against the background of the Chinese heritage of a long feudal culture, technocracy is a better way to confront social problems than authoritarian politics divorced from technical expertise.”

Click to expand...

The WEF, the Trilateral Commission and other G3P think-tanks have encouraged the development needed for the PRC State Council’s NDRC to construct the burgeoning Technate. Foreign investment and an infusion of technology, from the current leading nations of the existing IRBO, has brought China to a position where it will provide the economic, political and cultural impetus for a new world order.

Technocracy, as piloted in China, is now being rolled out globally. Individual sovereignty and freedoms, the claimed moral basis for the current IRBO, are being replaced by a commitment to efficiency and resource management in the interests of the “general good.” In the West, we know this as “sustainable development.”

Such a system is perfect for those who want to wield supreme autocratic power, which is precisely why the G3P have long wished to install technocracy globally. It is the reason why they have assisted the construction of a Technate in China. The new IRBO will be led by the technocrat and they will serve the Global Public-Private Partnership.

While technocracy was an impossible dream in the 1930s, today it is eminently achievable. Just as Brzezinski foresaw, the required technological capability now exists.

When Klaus Schwab and George Soros said China would be the engine of the new IRBO and the leaders of the 4th Industrial Revolution, they didn’t mean that China would become the centre of a political hegemony, as the US has been. Rather, China is the exemplar of technocracy, providing an operational model for the new global system alongside the supposedly necessary economic growth.

This new IRBO is the world order designed by the G3P. It is a neofeudal, techno-fascist, global technocracy led by a worldwide, multistakeholder network of vested, private interests.

The governments we elect will enforce the G3P policy agenda. The MSM’s task, who are both partners within and propagandists for the G3P, is to convince us to buy into it.

grizzzman said:

Or perhaps the fact that Tiktok has access to you phone info, or that they choose what you see based on the info gathered from you?

Click to expand...

Yeah the CIA is getting jealous