diy solar

diy solar

Last fire.. :-(

from my seat, compressing the cells after swelling likely caused an internal short. Cells are not flat, run a dial Indica over them and they are a topographical map, some even slightly trapezoidal. Compressing non flat shapes results in incredible localized pressure point Or points. there is also possibility of stress at terminals from same compressing operation.
I put my pack in compression before top balancing, used 5mm neoprene in between to account for cell non-uniformity. At most I should have 25% pressure variance across the entire side of the battery Givin the mapped surfaces and compression curve of the neoprene. Also all materials touching cells are non conductive.

just my opinion, either start with compression or don’t , but don’t make a change once the pack is swollen. The internal rainbow of layers is crystalline, not like spring steel or hydraulic, pressure from the apex crushes outer layers together Rather than flattening the rainbow.
 
from my seat, compressing the cells after swelling likely caused an internal short. Cells are not flat, run a dial Indica over them and they are a topographical map, some even slightly trapezoidal. Compressing non flat shapes results in incredible localized pressure point Or points. there is also possibility of stress at terminals from same compressing operation.
I put my pack in compression before top balancing, used 5mm neoprene in between to account for cell non-uniformity. At most I should have 25% pressure variance across the entire side of the battery Givin the mapped surfaces and compression curve of the neoprene. Also all materials touching cells are non conductive.

just my opinion, either start with compression or don’t , but don’t make a change once the pack is swollen. The internal rainbow of layers is crystalline, not like spring steel or hydraulic, pressure from the apex crushes outer layers together Rather than flattening the rainbow.
This makes sense.
Cell compression is to retain a shape, not create a different shape. OP stated, he made adjustments and compressions after bulges, and adjusted compression several times with the pack…
This explains the cells bursting. But does not explain the fire.
there had to be an ignition source to light the vapors.
 
I'm grateful when people are willing to post their failures and suggest separate forum on this board for accidents and investigations that could have special rules for posting to minimize insults and accusations and encourage open discourse. This thread has been surprisingly civil but I am unaware of whether moderation may have been employed to keep it so. In any case thanks to the OP for sharing his trouble and I hope he has benefited from the exercise. He certainly paid for our free tuition.

Me too (not that metoo :LOL: )

I would love to see a topic like "I ducked up", or "investigate it", or "what went wrong", or ...
Even if most people would not post his faults.


There is a saying :
Geniuses learn from other's mistakes,
smart people learn from their own mistakes,
and stupid people never learn.
Be the first :)
 
Some new information.

One of my Inverters died today.
The inverter directly above the fire.

Naturally I cleaned the inverters inside after the fire, mostly due the sand/clay dust that came with putting out the fire with sand.

Pressurised air and a dry, unused paintbrush, inside and out, disassembled all components and put humpty Dumpty back together.

How many weeks since the fire? About a month?

Picture from internal:
IMG_20210811_213906_267.jpg

Rust.

No, not from water, the other inverters have NOT a rust problem.

I can share more pictures of Rusty screws, bolts and nuts, this is clear enough.

It also (for me) absolutely confirms the reason of failure, self discharge of the cell, probably failure from cascade of micro errors.

This inverter was above the fire, and the smoke detector is directly above there.

Smoke will have passed via the inverter, probably (almost) all, as it's push-pull 2*2 120mm fans...

After the smoke detector alarm went off, I stoped all electricity with one disconnect (contactor based for solar and battery :). )

The smoke was acid.
Electrolyte apparently is acid chemical stuff that when it does vent/ go in fire, that smoke is dangerous for all electronics.

I would not advise to breath it either.
Putting out the fire was not fun, mainly due the chemical smoke.
Not smoke from melted wires or wood or paint or.... Never smelled anything like that before, but felt really toxic.
Sure, I have COPD, so smoke quickly makes breathing a problem for me.
This was different.
Chemical, bad, bad, stuff.

@HighTechLab your cell fire looked like mine, the leaking flames.
I don't know if you smelled the smoke, but probably can confirm, it is nasty.


I really tried not to react on @mrzed001 as I feel he just likes to make a quick score. It keeps bugging me so.... :

With your comment that no sheets between is an "error" or fault, you also make a joke of @Will Prowse in your eyes. What video do you see Will using separator sheets??
Perhaps knowledge you obtain recently??
All people who have no separator sheets are in direct danger?

And yes, apparently you didn't read the thread.
Some people say it's crazy dangerous to have LiFePO4 cells inside the house.
The safe type lithium.
Yet, they have the Unsafe lithium by their bed side.......
What explains for you the video of explosion of phone battery.
I doubt it's explanation was needed for others who have read the thread and don't do cherry picking response.

Why agressieve towards your post?
As it feels lik you just try to score and point to blame.
Not being productive or supportive at all in that post.

I doubt you even know how to top balance, in your idea cells reach 3.4v are fully charged...
Try to charge a few cells yourself and you know that's not realistic.
Discharge test will reveal 5-10% imbalance between the cells.

Only really fully charged cell is a cell a few hours @ 3.65v
I doubt that is worth any dispute.
But welcome to do this via PM.
We will make together a new thread based on the outcome to explain the forum and world when a LiFePO4 cell is 100% SOC.

Perhaps several days on 3.4 might get it higher charged and more close together.
Yes, a laserwelder would be nice also..... Unobtainable.

Off grid = no electricity except what you make. About 10 hours solar.
Not 24 hours grid....
I can't bent space and time.
For those who can..
Have the environment that makes almost anything possible, it's easy
.
Most of us need to work with limited access to tools, time, electricity, financial funds, etc.


Now that is of my chest...
Back to the inverter.

Yes, failed cell.
Why, many small errors, starting with too many sheets in a housing, failed BMS (active balancer BMS, worked 3 days), not compress the cells, damaged threads due a few remounts with the screws of the seller.
(One time build would be not a problem, if also the BMS would not have failed, etc etc etc)
No torque meter to tighten the nuts equally over the whole pack.
And relocation, not as one unit but cells.

What wasn't an error
- no sheets between.
- wires.
That it is a lot doesn't make it unsafe
- my choice of clamping BMS wires between nuts instead of on the bus-bar. With reason as BMS do fail and lugs need to be replaced, at the moment threads in the weak aluminium will fail...
Not optimal, sure, sadly only laserweld is optimal.

Perhaps an error:
- thread repair. Not the way of making, it should not be done at all in the first place, drilling a hole., Tapping threads.
It does place stress on the thermal, as cutting threads uses force.
Even with oil, it is a stressing factor.
The seller or garage workshop that cut the threads did not use oil, (when you make close up you can see the difference between with and without oil thread cutting)
That's already "damaged" before it's installed.
Cascade of micro errors, not all made by me.

- using the screws provided...
Failure?? Will is using them. Without different information, it's not an error or fault.
It just turns out not to work as expected.

- buying China BMS (low quality like Daly, Jikong, where low quality is debatable, but... They do fail.
Fail lot more then electrodacus, Batrium, Orion or other high quality BMS.)
With failure, nuts untighten or screw removed = protential thread loss.

For all accounts:
If I would have known better, I would have done better.

Doing something that turns out not to work is not making an error.
Edison did not make 1000 errors before the light kept burning for a few seconds.

Error is negative, like making a fault.

Mistakes where made, and shared
For mine and your entertainment, and sometimes educational.

Pointing a blaim or trying to say something is stupid....
That doesn't help anyone.
Just an easy score.

Failure is part of life, that how most of us learn.
Sometimes funny, like a kitten first steps, falling, trying and at the end jumping and running around.

DIY LiFePO4 is new.
Especially in the high ampere regions.

What was true for 20Ah cells, they came standard with thread, isn't true for 200Ah cells.
20A cells won't standard face 40A, C0.2 charge,
or 0.5, 100A

Thinking that the challenge for 20A cells is the same as 200A...
Is unwise...
Like a 10A fuse placed in an 100A setup and expect that it will work fine with 100A loads.

February 2020 was my start of LiFePO4 adventure.
Anyone who wants to point, should do that with the available knowledge on that time, in this forum.

Some begin installations of Will might now be seen as Unsafe.
His knowledge also grows.

The ones who like easy scores should comment on those early videos.

Always easy score looking in the past with knowledge of today.

Just remember, the knowledge you have today is there because of the past.
 
One of my Inverters died today.
The inverter directly above the fire.

Naturally I cleaned the inverters inside after the fire, mostly due the sand/clay dust that came with putting out the fire with sand.

Pressurised air and a dry, unused paintbrush, inside and out, disassembled all components and put humpty Dumpty back together.
The cells electrolyte if in contact with water (moisture) creates hydrofluoric acid. That is so corrosive it attacks even glass.


I really tried not to react on @mrzed001 as I feel he just likes to make a quick score. It keeps bugging me so.... :
Why agressieve towards your post?
As it feels lik you just try to score and point to blame.
Not being productive or supportive at all in that post.
No hard feelings.
I simply run audits. Internal audits, IT audits, security audits, ...
Also risk assessment and internal investigations.

What you saw was a professional (quick) investigation and risk assessment of your system.
Believe me I know. It can be painful when your system or installation (or program or something) is under the microscope.
But, this is the way ... to learn from your own mistakes ... or mistakes you never ever heard before.


With your comment that no sheets between is an "error" or fault, you also make a joke of @Will Prowse in your eyes. What video do you see Will using separator sheets??
Perhaps knowledge you obtain recently??
All people who have no separator sheets are in direct danger?
Yes, I say that not having a solid separator between the cells is a risk factor. Lower risk factor on closed plastic (manufactured) batteries, higher risk factor on DiY packs.
You can live with it or you can do against it. It is your choice.

Like if you do not use an antivirus and firewall software on your Windows PC. You can live with it. I will say it is a high security risk.
Can happen that your PC never ever get infected, no mallware, no ransomware, ....
But when it does all I can say is that I warned you about the risk, and you accepted that.


I doubt you even know how to top balance, in your idea cells reach 3.4v are fully charged...
Try to charge a few cells yourself and you know that's not realistic.
Discharge test will reveal 5-10% imbalance between the cells.

Only really fully charged cell is a cell a few hours @ 3.65v
I doubt that is worth any dispute.
But welcome to do this via PM.
We will make together a new thread based on the outcome to explain the forum and world when a LiFePO4 cell is 100% SOC.

Perhaps several days on 3.4 might get it higher charged and more close together.
Please check Andy's video on this topic because you spread a lot of misconception:




Yes, failed cell.
Why, many small errors, starting with too many sheets in a housing, failed BMS (active balancer BMS, worked 3 days), not compress the cells, damaged threads due a few remounts with the screws of the seller.
(One time build would be not a problem, if also the BMS would not have failed, etc etc etc)
Andy just made a video presenting what happens if you only have an active balancer and no BMS


Always easy score looking in the past with knowledge of today.

Just remember, the knowledge you have today is there because of the past.
And that is what you can learn from your (and others) failures.
This is why we inspected your build. You learned from that.
Everyone who read this topic learns from that.
Every case every conclusion can save batteries, money, even lives.
And only that counts.
 
@HighTechLab your cell fire looked like mine, the leaking flames.
I don't know if you smelled the smoke, but probably can confirm, it is nasty.
Indeed nasty. I intentionally did the test in the middle of a field where there is a TON of fresh air and never stood in the direction of the smoke/steam of chemicals.
 
February 2020 was my start of LiFePO4 adventure.
Anyone who wants to point, should do that with the available knowledge on that time, in this forum.
That's a very good point :) There has been much learned since then and most of us are learning something new every day.

All people who have no separator sheets are in direct danger?
I do believe the more protection the better. If it's even a small possibility separator sheets can prevent a catastrophic failure then why not use them?
 
Without a schematic (which I understand is coming) and many other sundry details, it is hard to know anything for certain, however, it is useful to explore possible scenarios that could have produced the outcome.

By the way, the cells look they were all involved in this meltdown but to varying degrees which seemed strange to me except for an idea that struck me a few moments ago. Maybe this is all obvious but was not jumping out at me from the various discussions (I have read the majority of the thread today).

It looks like one possible explainaton I have not heard anybody describe in any detail which is that if a single cell is shorted (as is suspected by OP), then that would give us an NS and a (N-1)S parallel configuration. Assume 3S and 4S for the moment where the 4S terminal voltage was at 13.2V ( 3.3V cell voltage) then the 3S cell will be only 9.9V.

Given the LiFePO4 Voltage vs SOC characteristic, that means that the 4S battery at 13.2V needs to discharge all its current down to below 10V to meet the 3S battery voltage. At the same time, the 3S battery (with no BMS cutoff in place) will accept that current into 3 of the 4 working cells. Even at 3.65V cell voltage, we are at 11V at the 3S battery terminals. So the good cells in the 3S will be charged using the full capacity of the 4S battery and the discharge rate of the 4S will be dependent on a 0.8 volt differential; with 0.1 Ohm of internal resistance that is 80 amps.

Had there been a BMS on the 3S it would have shut down due to low voltage on the single-cell and even if it has not, the BMS on the 4S would have eventually shut down due to over current or low cell voltage but nothing guarantees that would have been prior to the fire.

Even though a BMS is a single point of failure for a battery system, it is your first and most important line of defense, specifically in the form of charging and discharge disconnects.
 
The theory the one cell developed an internal short and caused the meltdown and fire just doesn't seem plausible to me.
To my knowledge we don't have any examples of this happening before.

We have seen a lot of examples of a connection getting VERY hot if there is a loose connection or corrosion causing a bad connection ..... I think that it is the most likely explanation of what caused that cell to melt down.
 
The theory the one cell developed an internal short and caused the meltdown and fire just doesn't seem plausible to me.
To my knowledge we don't have any examples of this happening before.

We have seen a lot of examples of a connection getting VERY hot if there is a loose connection or corrosion causing a bad connection ..... I think that it is the most likely explanation of what caused that cell to melt down.
I don't see how a hot connection would explain taking down both strings with such a uniform set of heat damage to the cells in the strings. How would that have occurred in this situation?
 
I don't see how a hot connection would explain taking down both strings with such a uniform set of heat damage to the cells in the strings. How would that have occurred in this situation?
If you look closely at the pic he posted of the cell where the fire seems to have originated .... it looks very much like the cell post may have been where the heat originated.

edit: I just looked for the picture I was talking about and couldn't find it .... will look again tomorrow when I'm more fresh.
 
Last edited:
If you look closely at the pic he posted of the cell where the fire seems to have originated .... it looks very much like the cell post may have been where the heat originated.

edit: I just looked for the picture I was talking about and couldn't find it .... will look again tomorrow when I'm more fresh.
Yes, I saw that picture of the melted post, and yes it obviously got hot and was "possibly/probably" ground zero of the fault. But, why/how could the rest of the cells burn up so uniformly from this "hot spot"?
 
Back
Top