Apparently not.Is this a promise? Please say it's true.
Apparently not.Is this a promise? Please say it's true.
LA Times is right wing news.My cousin sent me a text from Georgia where he said enjoy closed down California. Was pretty funny since we were going to restaurants, camping...he wouldn't set foot in a restaurant since his son was going through some sort of immunity treatment. Covid didn't do much to change our life in california at all. Of course the right wing news channels and the Whackos made it sound like it was really bad!
I thought you were done!LA Times is right wing news.
Stop smoking crack. Covid didnt do much to change our life in california at all?
Jesus christ why are you trolling us.
Ive documented and proved with links the multitude of businesses that were shuttered. Schools were closed. Lockdown and stay at home orders. People even ordered not to travel to neighboring counties.
SoCal freeways that normally crawl at 5 mph during rush hour could be driven at 80mph at 5pm on weekdays.
What the hell am I doing arguing with a proven liar.
His own site describes that he banned ICE from entering jails, stations, and courthouses.LOL...you mean Alex Villanueva!
He is on the right wing side of things. He is the one that got in trouble for doing homeless roundups. At least research a little bit before you spout more bullshit.
He banned courts from releasing prisoners to ICE. You have it 180 degrees backasswards. How am I not surprised.
There is a up arrow button next to the names to see which message, if any, people respond to. It isn't rocket science..You want me to find my post out of 600+ messages here that you have a problem with. All you need to do is prove that I said what you described since you wont I probably didnt.
Overall, we rate the LA Times, Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that favor the left and High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record.LA Times is right wing news.
It isn't hard to find what the state was doing, for example here is a time-line of the measures.Covid didnt do much to change our life in california at all?
Ive documented and proved with links the multitude of businesses that were shuttered. Schools were closed. Lockdown and stay at home orders. People even ordered not to travel to neighboring counties.
SoCal freeways that normally crawl at 5 mph during rush hour could be driven at 80mph at 5pm on weekdays.
He is not hyper-focused on that issue. Hre is hyperfocused on holding you accountable for lying. You say things, deny you say them change them, and then later say them all over again. It is a pattern of lying and misinformation and I applaud him for holding you accountable.You are the ONLY one who is hyper focused on what happened as Trump left office and a pandemic was decimating the world .... I was focused on what he did while he was IN office.
Do you deny that he achieved the lowest minority unemployment numbers EVER? .... Never mind, I don't intend to get into further discussion with you about something you seem to think is EXTREMELY important .... but in reality is totally meaningless.
Your focus on this is just another indication of the shallow nature of your posts.
You very simply rely on what you find by looking at Wikipedia or a couple of your favorite fact blocker sites. If you can't find what you want there .... you just make stuff up like the rest of your cronies .... or try to shift the discussion to something totally meaningless .... just like your latest responses to my post about Fauci .... You want to talk about other things that are meaningless.
I have spent a LOT of time researching Fauci .. and have read books about him ... including the similarities of the atrocities he committed during the aids epidemic .... Spend a little time reading up on what the guy is actually all about and then get back to me ..... no ... don't get back to me because what you think or say is meaningless to me ... other than being a pain in the backside with your clueless posts.
I don't recall any specific policies made by Trump to improve minority employment.
I believe this may have happened in spite of Trump rather than because of Trump.
Or what specific policy was enacted related to minority employment?
In review, the Washington Examiner format and content have been compared to The Hill, albeit with a right leaning tilt. They generally report political news as well as local Washington DC news stories. The Washington Examiner frequently utilizes loaded wording in sensationalized headlines such as Trump’s manic Monday amid the Kavanaugh storm. While the headlines may be sensational, articles’ content is written with less bias and tend to be properly sourced to credible media outlets. Editorially, the Washington Examiner is 100% right. It is virtually impossible to find a single editorial that offers some form of balance. Most editorials have anti-left loaded headlines such as this: Obama, the Great Divider when in office, lacks the credibility to lecture America.![]()
White House: Trump opportunity zones raised $75B to rebuild poorest communities - Washington Examiner
The Trump administration’s tax break for underprivileged neighborhoods has attracted an estimated $75 billion dollars in private investment, potentially lifting 1 million people out of poverty, according to a White House study.Opportunity zones were created in the tax overhaul of 2017, offering...www.washingtonexaminer.com
Do you REALLY think that changes the facts?In review, the Washington Examiner format and content have been compared to The Hill, albeit with a right leaning tilt. They generally report political news as well as local Washington DC news stories. The Washington Examiner frequently utilizes loaded wording in sensationalized headlines such as Trump’s manic Monday amid the Kavanaugh storm. While the headlines may be sensational, articles’ content is written with less bias and tend to be properly sourced to credible media outlets. Editorially, the Washington Examiner is 100% right. It is virtually impossible to find a single editorial that offers some form of balance. Most editorials have anti-left loaded headlines such as this: Obama, the Great Divider when in office, lacks the credibility to lecture America.
![]()
Washington Examiner - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They maymediabiasfactcheck.com
Sources matter. How can you not know this?Do you REALLY think that changes the facts?
No, but we have already established that your "facts" are not based on reality.Do you REALLY think that changes the facts?
So .... no evidence the data is false ... but ignored because of who reported it .... That is just totally nuts.No, but we have already established that your "facts" are not based on reality.
Thank you. Although there is some question on who this really helped and how much.![]()
White House: Trump opportunity zones raised $75B to rebuild poorest communities - Washington Examiner
The Trump administration’s tax break for underprivileged neighborhoods has attracted an estimated $75 billion dollars in private investment, potentially lifting 1 million people out of poverty, according to a White House study.Opportunity zones were created in the tax overhaul of 2017, offering...www.washingtonexaminer.com
You really dont need to jump into every conversation between other users, particularly if you cannot follow the argument.Overall, we rate the LA Times, Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that favor the left and High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record.
![]()
LA Times (Los Angeles Times) – Bias and Credibility
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wordingmediabiasfactcheck.com
It isn't hard to find what the state was doing, for example here is a time-line of the measures.
![]()
COVID-19 pandemic in California - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
If you dismiss a source merely because its bias is opposite your own, you must dismiss yourself as well. The criticisms including "loaded wording" are regularly practiced at CNN, MSNBC, NY Times, etc. If the source is so unreliable then rhe content should be easily refuted.Sources matter. How can you not know this?
You know, if you use Mediabiasfactcheck and stick to the middle'ish parts, your reputation might go up a few points.If you dismiss a source merely because its bias is opposite your own, you must dismiss yourself as well. The criticisms including "loaded wording" are regularly practiced at CNN, MSNBC, NY Times, etc. If the source is so unreliable then rhe content should be easily refuted.
You may want the safety of staying within your own echo chambers but sources meeting your approval is hardly a prerequisite for their content to be credible.
I constantly post garbage from far right sites, eh?You know, if you use Mediabiasfactcheck and stick to the middle'ish parts, your reputation might go up a few points.
But you constantly post garbage from the far right where the arrow is at.. some of your links are actually INSIDE the arrow.. Personally, while I bash you for doing it, I would also bash someone for posting in the left arrow or anywhere close to it.
I stick to the middle 25% left or 25% right.. That is where you find most of the truth and accuracy. Everything else just shows ignorance.
Fox is at about the 60% range on the right... not extreme, not centrist.I constantly post garbage from far right sites, eh?
Thats a claim Id like to see backed up, go back through the thread and copy and paste a few. Should take you no time at all since Im constantly doing it!
As for your self congratulatory claim about avoiding the 25% of each fringe, some years ago a Pew research article detailing polls of thousands of journalists and their editors, the vast majority, almost unanimously, identified politically as independent. However further poll questions revealed 88% had voted democrat in the last national election.
What is considered centrist in the media, is actually solid left to the citizens.
Perhaps this is why while leftists consider fox news to be so far right they ridicule any possible credibility it has nonetheless long been the top rated news network.
The thread? I was referring to posting right wing conspiracy links as a whole, not just in this thread.I constantly post garbage from far right sites, eh?
Thats a claim Id like to see backed up, go back through the thread and copy and paste a few.
What data?So .... no evidence the data is false ... but ignored because of who reported it .... That is just totally nuts.
I'm back to ignoring you guys ... it is impossible to overcome your ignorance and unwillingness to see the truth.
The one who's question I answered got it ..... I don't care if you do or not.What data?
Did you even read the article?
I don't need to do anything unless I want to.You really dont need to jump into every conversation between other users, particularly if you cannot follow the argument.
You guys have been posting a lot of right wing sources and when you have a history of spouting nonsense, it is hard to tell when you are being sarcastic.I KNOW the LA Times leans left, that was sarcasm because I provided a link then he mentioned right wing websites.
Oh, we all need educating, why would you be exempt? Providing the wikipedia link was was an attempt to get you (and others) to at least agree on the time line.That link was similar to what you just posted I hope you dont think this 59 year california native needs a canadian to educate him on our pandemic history.
You can however educate BRB, he made outlandish claims about it already.
I stand by the claimed speeds 100% your link does nothing to disprove my experience driving in san diego before and during the pandemic and its absurd for a user IN F***ING CANADA to tell someone who has been commuting in urban southern california for almost 40 years, that you know more about our traffic patterns than I do.I don't need to do anything unless I want to.
You guys have been posting a lot of right wing sources and when you have a history of spouting nonsense, it is hard to tell when you are being sarcastic.
Oh, we all need educating, why would you be exempt? Providing the wikipedia link was was an attempt to get you (and others) to at le ast agree on the time line.
The second link showed that the speed before and during the pandemic, again, giving you and every one a little more information than your wild claims of 5 and 80 miles per hour.
Only people who are open and want to learn can be educated. Are you open minded and willing to be educated?