So .... Since the NIH and FDA have refused to do a study to provide evidence of their claims that the mRNA Covid vaccines are ..... safe and effective. Florida Department of Health has done their OWN study ...... and based on that study ....
The state Surgeon General has issued a document recommending against the vaccine for males 18-39 years old.
The Florida Surgeon General had previously (March 2022) issued guidance against vaccinating healthy children and adolescents 5 years old to 17 years old. They have now expanded that to include infants to 5 years old ..... so,
their recommendations now include ALL healthy children under 17 years old.
Here is some of the info from the study that caused them to make these guidelines.
View attachment 115577
It seems to me that Florida's has the only sane guidelines .... because ... they are the ONLY ones who are truly following the science.
I am going to attach the PDF documents of the guidelines and their analysis... If you disagree with this study, please post evidence from a different study that refutes their conclusions about the risk of mortality from taking the mRNA vaccines VS not. They have make a LOT of claims, but have NOT done studies about mortality risks.
The guidelines for this type study can be viewed here ....
https://www.bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i4515
I will only be responding to reasonable comments that includes actual scientific evidence that supports the comments.
Limitations
These data are preliminary, based on surveillance data, and should be interpreted with caution. The
results have several limitations:
While this method has been used to assess risk of death following COVID-19 vaccination,2
it violates the
assumption that an event does not affect subsequent exposure (for mRNA vaccines), which may
introduce bias.6 Further, it does not consider the multidose vaccination schedule required for mRNA
vaccination.
This study cannot determine the causative nature of a participant’s death. We used death certificate
data and not medical records. COVID testing status was unknown for those who did not die of/with
COVID.
Cardiac-related deaths were ascertained if an ACME code of I3-I52 were on their death
certificate, thus, the underlying cause of death may not be cardiac-related.
The finding that the Janssen vaccine was more protective than mRNA vaccine against mortality within 28
days of vaccination could be due to confounding and needs to be further evaluated. It is likely that the
populations who received COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and the Johnson vaccine are different, something we
were not able to ascertain in this analysis. It is possible that the population who received the Johnson
vaccine was younger and healthier than those receiving the mRNA vaccines. The Pfizer and Moderna
mRNA vaccines were released more than 2 months earlier than the Janssen vaccine when the
recommendations were limited to those 65 and older.
Additional studies should be conducted to further understand the risks and benefits of vaccination of
males between 25-39.
Increased risk in the primary analysis for the 25 - 39 age group was based on a
small sample size. Additionally, significant mortality from diagnosed COVID-19 infection occurred among
all adult age groups. COVID-19 mortality among asymptomatic or undiagnosed COVID-19 infection is less
clear. However, excess overall mortality among 25–44-year-old Americans was significant in a study1
looking at mortality from January 2020-October 2020. The largest increases were among Hispanic and
Latino.
It is unclear what the contribution of asymptomatic or undiagnosed COVID-19 infection is to
mortality risk, and how this contributes to excess mortality.
![Wink ;) ;)]()