SilverbackMP
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2022
- Messages
- 928
TLDR; Does anyone know of an easy way to calculate how much is lost by not having panels seasonally adjusted? Or at the completely wrong pitch for the average for your latitude?
Rather than installing a ground mount, I am considering building a garage/barn since I have 15 24' wide pole barn trusses in storage along with some treated 6-inch posts. I would hang 12' shed extension off of the south side to give me 24' of south-facing roof space. I would need to build a few more trusses since I want 40' in length and I'd go 2' centers instead of 4' centers on the trusses (their design specification) due to the extra load. Not as concerned about the trusses as I am about the effects of panels on a metal roof.
I figure I can build a small barn (not including a concrete floor which is completely optional) cheaper than I can buy a good ground mount....particularly since I already have some of the material.
Zero permits, zero code inspections in my area (though you still need to build to it, but not the most recent codes as they haven't been adopted...just the common sense ones).
These trusses are 4/12 pitch which is 18.4 degrees with my year-round solar average being 33 degrees. Since this is an off-grid system, I am more concerned with seasonal peaks than a grid-tied system would be.
If we're talking a few percentage points of difference....even up to 10%, I am not worried about it too much. But if we're are in the higher percentages of inefficiencies, I'll switch up my plans. However, I've read that a lower slope is actually more efficient for collection during overcast days...and my area has lots of overcast and gloom in the winter.
I've Googled until I'm blue in the face trying to find the answer to this...and the only thing that I've turned up were some sites that I don't fully trust. (I own a company that publishes high-quality informational websites, I can easily smell when someone is err bullcraping and really has no clue as to what they are writing about).
Does anyone have an idea of the percentages lost for not having panels at the correct angles?
Rather than installing a ground mount, I am considering building a garage/barn since I have 15 24' wide pole barn trusses in storage along with some treated 6-inch posts. I would hang 12' shed extension off of the south side to give me 24' of south-facing roof space. I would need to build a few more trusses since I want 40' in length and I'd go 2' centers instead of 4' centers on the trusses (their design specification) due to the extra load. Not as concerned about the trusses as I am about the effects of panels on a metal roof.
I figure I can build a small barn (not including a concrete floor which is completely optional) cheaper than I can buy a good ground mount....particularly since I already have some of the material.
Zero permits, zero code inspections in my area (though you still need to build to it, but not the most recent codes as they haven't been adopted...just the common sense ones).
These trusses are 4/12 pitch which is 18.4 degrees with my year-round solar average being 33 degrees. Since this is an off-grid system, I am more concerned with seasonal peaks than a grid-tied system would be.
If we're talking a few percentage points of difference....even up to 10%, I am not worried about it too much. But if we're are in the higher percentages of inefficiencies, I'll switch up my plans. However, I've read that a lower slope is actually more efficient for collection during overcast days...and my area has lots of overcast and gloom in the winter.
I've Googled until I'm blue in the face trying to find the answer to this...and the only thing that I've turned up were some sites that I don't fully trust. (I own a company that publishes high-quality informational websites, I can easily smell when someone is err bullcraping and really has no clue as to what they are writing about).
Does anyone have an idea of the percentages lost for not having panels at the correct angles?
Last edited: