diy solar

diy solar

Get ready for the coming little ice age!

We haven't gone back because there is a group of people in charge who can't even set boundaries in regards to who is male and who is female.

We have gone backwards and turned things into problems that the ancients figured out long ago.
Maybe ppl like Wernher Von Braun do not exist anymore. Ever seen the movie Idiocracy? The military sent the strongest to fight and die in foreign wars which “leftist” weak retards to multiply. Nikola Tesla knew how to work claimed he dug ditches as in manual labor for employment at one time in his life. Imagine a genius digging ditches for food. 🤣😀🤡


Where are ppl like, Nikola Tesla.? Do they even exist anymore? Why is Nikola Tesla not promoted and why was he sorta buried?
What college did he go to and why isn’t it over run with students? Hmmmm ….

Ask ppl who was the smartest man alive what will be the name? What did he really do? Is he jewish? Hahahaha ….hahaha

Was Braun or Tesla jewish? Think they went back and persecuted Braun for having been in Nazi SS. He was called father of space program.
hahaha hahaha

btw I don’t like NAzi with exception of Nationalist part. They were also Socialist….nope not for me. But do thinkppl are funny as hell - ignorance is comical. Watch Idiocracy.
 
@aenyc


40's technology for rocket guidance. Do you possess the technical skills to be able to read and understand how that works?


This is a strawman argument.
The Soviets sent a sputnik to orbit the earth in 1957. They even built a space station (Mir) way before anyone else. And they sent rovers (Lunokhod) to the moon, supposedly. (And Venus, and Mars, but many crashed until they got success)
US has sent probes like Voyager and many others.
But these things are astronomically easier that actually putting a lander with humans on the moon, then taking off, then redocking and returning to earth.
We are talking several sigmas delta in difficulty. (And the directly observable proof of that is that it has not been done since, even with automated probes, with today's tech)
Again, I am not saying the mission did not happen, i just said i have my doubts, because there are too many gaps in the story. (And i have done more research on both American and Soviet space programs than you can possibly imagine)
 
Here is something to ponder. I had no idea Germany had rockets in the 40's until I saw it at the Paul Allen Heritage Flying Collection.

They used them to hit London.


Elon Musk had woe after woe so imagine a system like skyhook with high speed docking, an even higher speed sling shot launch, and not losing the energy that was transferred in the sling shot move. I don’t see it.

Does this look real? Watch Space X land on a barge. Ever been out on the ocean in a ship? Imagine a moving barge anchored and a rocket landing vertically on it. That is not a real landing = cgi. The real one reportedly crashed and broke up like a cracker hit with a sledge hammer. 🤣😀

Landing a rocket vertically on an anchored barge? 🤡🤣😀👉🏻🤣
Landing system for helicopter on ship deck.

”’’’

SpaceX Starship Woes Has NASA Worried About Artemis Moon Landing Delays​

Passant Rabie Avatar
Passant Rabie
8 months ago
June 9, 2023 at 3:55 pm

SpaceX’s Starship could end up delaying humanity’s return to the Moon as NASA waits on the company’s lander to be ready to touchdown on the lunar surface, according to a space agency official.
On Wednesday, Jim Free, NASA associate administrator for exploration systems development, said that the Artemis 3 mission, designed to land astronauts on the Moon for the first time in more than 50 years, would likely be pushed back to 2026 instead of 2025, SpaceNews reported.

“With the difficulties that SpaceX has had, I think that’s really concerning,” Free said during a joint meeting of the National Academies’ Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board and Space Studies Board.
SpaceX is under a $US2.89 billion contract to use a lunar lander version of its Starship rocket in landing humans on the Moon by late 2025 as part of NASA’s Artemis 3 mission, and then again for Artemis 4 in 2028, under a separate $US1.15 billion contract signed last year.
Before it can land humans on the Moon, however, Starship has to carry out an uncrewed mission to the lunar surface first, which also involves launching tanking vehicles to Earth orbit so that they can fuel the vehicle prior to its journey to the Moon. “That’s a lot of launches to get those missions done,” Free is quoted as saying in SpaceNews. “They have a significant number of launches to go, and that, of course, gives me concern about the December of 2025 [Artemis 3 launch] date.”
NASA has a second option for a commercial lunar lander, namely Blue Origin’s Blue Moon, but that’s slated for Artemis 5, which won’t happen until 2029.
SpaceX’s Starship launched for the first time on April 20 for a less-than-perfect test flight. About four minutes after liftoff, Starship exploded in the skies above the Gulf of Mexico. A few of the rocket’s engines failed in flight and the two-stage heavy-lift launch vehicle was forced to self-destruct; that said, it took the rocket 40 seconds to respond to the self-destruct command, in what was yet another troublesome aspect from the debut launch.
Despite its untimely explosion, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk still deemed the test flight a success and anticipated that Starship would be ready to fly again in a “couple of months.” At the time, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson expressed confidence in SpaceX’s ambitious timeline during a hearing before the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee.
It may have been that NASA’s sentiment recently changed after SpaceX showed little to no progress on the launch of Starship more than a month after its orbital test flight. SpaceX still needs the green light from the Federal Aviation Administration, which has grounded Starship pending an ongoing investigation into its botched flight. The FAA is also battling a lawsuitrelated to the botched launch, which prompted a coalition of conservation and Texas-local non-profit groups to sue the administration over its approval of SpaceX’s Starship activities in Boca Chica. SpaceX recently filed to fight alongside the FAA in this lawsuit.
The space agency is on a tight timeline for its Artemis program, fearing that China may take the lead in landing on the Moon. China recently announced that it is targeting 2030 for its own crewed landing on the Moon, aiming to establish its own presence on the lunar surface to compete with NASA.
NASA has been relying more on its commercial partners as of late and that can sometimes lead to delays outside of the space agency’s control. SpaceX has been successful in delivering astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station (ISS) as part of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, while Boeing has fallen behind with its CST-100 Starliner program designed for the same missions.
The space agency’s private partnerships are designed to save NASA time and money, although it can come with its own bout of launch vehicle anxiety.“‘’’


Hmmmm …… NASA did not use Space X current plan… How did Apollo astronauts transfer from CSM to the lunar lander… look at the video for multiple docking too. 😀🤣

Japanese pull off unmanned soft lunar landing updated in 2024 No power from solar panels.

hahaha lot of unmanned lunar landings …. Hmmmm 50+ years ago reported moon walking like michael jackson. MC Hammer can’t touch this…. Elon Musk is going to end up MC Hammer broke. Who is going to make the new space suits? Idea Just borrow the ones out of museums. Micro meteors. 😀🤣
 

Elon Musk had woe after woe so imagine a system like skyhook with high speed docking, an even higher speed sling shot launch, and not losing the energy that was transferred in the sling shot move. I don’t see it.

Does this look real? Watch Space X land on a barge. Ever been out on the ocean in a ship? Imagine a moving barge anchored and a rocket landing vertically on it. That is not a real landing = cgi. The real one reportedly crashed and broke up like a cracker hit with a sledge hammer. 🤣😀

Landing a rocket vertically on an anchored barge? 🤡🤣😀👉🏻🤣
Landing system for helicopter on ship deck.

”’’’

SpaceX Starship Woes Has NASA Worried About Artemis Moon Landing Delays​

Passant Rabie Avatar
Passant Rabie
8 months ago
June 9, 2023 at 3:55 pm

SpaceX’s Starship could end up delaying humanity’s return to the Moon as NASA waits on the company’s lander to be ready to touchdown on the lunar surface, according to a space agency official.
On Wednesday, Jim Free, NASA associate administrator for exploration systems development, said that the Artemis 3 mission, designed to land astronauts on the Moon for the first time in more than 50 years, would likely be pushed back to 2026 instead of 2025, SpaceNews reported.

“With the difficulties that SpaceX has had, I think that’s really concerning,” Free said during a joint meeting of the National Academies’ Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board and Space Studies Board.
SpaceX is under a $US2.89 billion contract to use a lunar lander version of its Starship rocket in landing humans on the Moon by late 2025 as part of NASA’s Artemis 3 mission, and then again for Artemis 4 in 2028, under a separate $US1.15 billion contract signed last year.
Before it can land humans on the Moon, however, Starship has to carry out an uncrewed mission to the lunar surface first, which also involves launching tanking vehicles to Earth orbit so that they can fuel the vehicle prior to its journey to the Moon. “That’s a lot of launches to get those missions done,” Free is quoted as saying in SpaceNews. “They have a significant number of launches to go, and that, of course, gives me concern about the December of 2025 [Artemis 3 launch] date.”
NASA has a second option for a commercial lunar lander, namely Blue Origin’s Blue Moon, but that’s slated for Artemis 5, which won’t happen until 2029.
SpaceX’s Starship launched for the first time on April 20 for a less-than-perfect test flight. About four minutes after liftoff, Starship exploded in the skies above the Gulf of Mexico. A few of the rocket’s engines failed in flight and the two-stage heavy-lift launch vehicle was forced to self-destruct; that said, it took the rocket 40 seconds to respond to the self-destruct command, in what was yet another troublesome aspect from the debut launch.
Despite its untimely explosion, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk still deemed the test flight a success and anticipated that Starship would be ready to fly again in a “couple of months.” At the time, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson expressed confidence in SpaceX’s ambitious timeline during a hearing before the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee.
It may have been that NASA’s sentiment recently changed after SpaceX showed little to no progress on the launch of Starship more than a month after its orbital test flight. SpaceX still needs the green light from the Federal Aviation Administration, which has grounded Starship pending an ongoing investigation into its botched flight. The FAA is also battling a lawsuitrelated to the botched launch, which prompted a coalition of conservation and Texas-local non-profit groups to sue the administration over its approval of SpaceX’s Starship activities in Boca Chica. SpaceX recently filed to fight alongside the FAA in this lawsuit.
The space agency is on a tight timeline for its Artemis program, fearing that China may take the lead in landing on the Moon. China recently announced that it is targeting 2030 for its own crewed landing on the Moon, aiming to establish its own presence on the lunar surface to compete with NASA.
NASA has been relying more on its commercial partners as of late and that can sometimes lead to delays outside of the space agency’s control. SpaceX has been successful in delivering astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station (ISS) as part of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, while Boeing has fallen behind with its CST-100 Starliner program designed for the same missions.
The space agency’s private partnerships are designed to save NASA time and money, although it can come with its own bout of launch vehicle anxiety.“‘’’


Hmmmm …… NASA did not use Space X current plan… How did Apollo astronauts transfer from CSM to the lunar lander… look at the video for multiple docking too. 😀🤣

Japanese pull off unmanned soft lunar landing updated in 2024 No power from solar panels.

hahaha lot of unmanned lunar landings …. Hmmmm 50+ years ago reported moon walking like michael jackson. MC Hammer can’t touch this…. Elon Musk is going to end up MC Hammer broke. Who is going to make the new space suits? Idea Just borrow the ones out of museums. Micro meteors. 😀🤣


You lost me here. Are you saying SpaceX landings are fake?
 
This is a strawman argument.
The Soviets sent a sputnik to orbit the earth in 1957. They even built a space station (Mir) way before anyone else. And they sent rovers (Lunokhod) to the moon, supposedly. (And Venus, and Mars, but many crashed until they got success)
US has sent probes like Voyager and many others.
But these things are astronomically easier that actually putting a lander with humans on the moon, then taking off, then redocking and returning to earth.
We are talking several sigmas delta in difficulty. (And the directly observable proof of that is that it has not been done since, even with automated probes, with today's tech)
Again, I am not saying the mission did not happen, i just said i have my doubts, because there are too many gaps in the story. (And i have done more research on both American and Soviet space programs than you can possibly imagine)

It's easier if you just say you don't understand.

You need to be honest with yourself or you just end up looking crazy.
 
It's easier if you just say you don't understand.

You need to be honest with yourself or you just end up looking crazy.

Ok boss. I suggest you actually do some research instead of falling to ad-hominem.
Its amazing you don think the vaxxes are safe and effective, so at least there is hope.
 
Ok boss. I suggest you actually do some research instead of falling to ad-hominem.
Its amazing you don think the vaxxes are safe and effective, so at least there is hope.

Sure, all that or you just don't understand.
 
Maybe ppl like Wernher Von Braun do not exist anymore. Ever seen the movie Idiocracy? The military sent the strongest to fight and die in foreign wars which “leftist” weak retards to multiply. Nikola Tesla knew how to work claimed he dug ditches as in manual labor for employment at one time in his life. Imagine a genius digging ditches for food. 🤣😀🤡


Where are ppl like, Nikola Tesla.? Do they even exist anymore? Why is Nikola Tesla not promoted and why was he sorta buried?
What college did he go to and why isn’t it over run with students? Hmmmm ….

Ask ppl who was the smartest man alive what will be the name? What did he really do? Is he jewish? Hahahaha ….hahaha

Was Braun or Tesla jewish? Think they went back and persecuted Braun for having been in Nazi SS. He was called father of space program.
hahaha hahaha

btw I don’t like NAzi with exception of Nationalist part. They were also Socialist….nope not for me. But do thinkppl are funny as hell - ignorance is comical. Watch Idiocracy.
Theres a book out there that tells the story about einstein being promoted as the smartest man in the world by jews for propaganda purposes. I read part of it, its not inconceivable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D71
Who is the author of that paper? Let's google it...Oh, she's a mathematician...
No one is more surprised than Valentina Zharkova that her research prompted a worldwide media storm over the next ice age.​
That's because her research never even mentioned an ice age.​
Media outlets got wind of her research and some concluded it suggested the 2030s would be the world’s next ice age because of the drop in solar activity.​
“In the press release, we didn’t say anything about climate change,” she told USA TODAY. “My guess is when they heard about Maunder minimum, they used Wikipedia or something to find out more about it.”​
So... Whats your point, that its a lie that a modern grand solar minimum is coming? Do you have a credible scientific journal (that doesnt publish work from environmentalist activists pretending to be scientists) that says the 350 year solar cycle theory is bullshit?
Are you saying the maunder minimum didnt cause global cooling? 0_gtjg_BjQb-F2hb_M.png
We've been hearing this bullshit about humans and climate for too long. More energy from the sun hits the earth in one day than all the energy generated by humans in 10,000 years of recorded history. Look at the solar activity since 1940. Most active average cycles over the 400 year history. Oh but its all humans.
Heres the funny thing about "climate change research". Nobody, I mean nobody, devotes their life to a field of research in something they believe isnt real or isnt happening.
How many atheists become priests?
Thats right. Every single "climate change scientist" is an ideologue whose sole purpose is to sell their beliefs as propaganda, all their research is carefully crafted to manipulate statistics toward a singular conclusion. Their concensus is shouting into an echo chamber, and its absolute fact that if the consensus were to shift to disproving AGW, funding would dry up and theyd all be cleaning out their desks in a month.
You people lack the critical thinking skills to even consider this or share their ideology so dont care.
 
...so dont care.
You sound fairly passionate about it for someone who doesn't care.

The mathematician cited (Valentina Zharkova) said:
...During this modern grand minimum, one would expect to see a reduction of the average terrestrial temperature by up to 1.0°C...
Good thing too! How likely is this mathematician's theory? It's important to understand that she's not a scientist or physist in solar dynmanics. She is using the number of sunspots recorded to try and predict when there will be exceedly few. Her paper doesn't state the degree of confidence so one might think of it as a best guess. She does say:
...it was rather difficult to match the observed sunspot numbers with the modeled ones unless the cycle is well progressed. This difficulty is a clear indication of some missing points in the definition of solar activity by sunspot numbers...

NASA has a lot to say about it here, but in short: There Is No Impending 'Mini Ice Age'

Thats right. Every single "climate change scientist" is an ideologue whose sole purpose is to sell their beliefs as propaganda
That's a little hard to believe. Even Valentia published on a government website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). If it's all as you say, why would they have published her paper?

You people lack the critical thinking skills
Says the person who doesn't understand what they quoted. Perhaps this will help you....

 
Last edited:
So... Whats your point, that its a lie that a modern grand solar minimum is coming? Do you have a credible scientific journal (that doesnt publish work from environmentalist activists pretending to be scientists) that says the 350 year solar cycle theory is bullshit?
Are you saying the maunder minimum didnt cause global cooling? View attachment 196825
We've been hearing this bullshit about humans and climate for too long. More energy from the sun hits the earth in one day than all the energy generated by humans in 10,000 years of recorded history. Look at the solar activity since 1940. Most active average cycles over the 400 year history. Oh but its all humans.
Heres the funny thing about "climate change research". Nobody, I mean nobody, devotes their life to a field of research in something they believe isnt real or isnt happening.
How many atheists become priests?
Thats right. Every single "climate change scientist" is an ideologue whose sole purpose is to sell their beliefs as propaganda, all their research is carefully crafted to manipulate statistics toward a singular conclusion. Their concensus is shouting into an echo chamber, and its absolute fact that if the consensus were to shift to disproving AGW, funding would dry up and theyd all be cleaning out their desks in a month.
You people lack the critical thinking skills to even consider this or share their ideology so dont care.

If I was president I would say ok, we are going to quickly divest fossil fuel usage but in exchange absolutely ZERO dollars will be spent on further research into climate change.

You sound fairly passionate about it for someone who doesn't care.

The mathematician cited (Valentina Zharkova) said:

Good thing too! How likely is this mathematician's theory? It's important to understand that she's not a scientist or physist in solar dynmanics. She is using the number of sunspots recorded to try and predict when there will be exceedly few. Her paper doesn't state the degree of confidence so one might think of it as a best guess. She does say:


NASA has a lot to say about it here, but in short: There Is No Impending 'Mini Ice Age'


That's a little hard to believe.


Says the person who doesn't understand what they quoted. Perhaps this will help you....


Notice the commonality between the white beard weird guy Svetz kept posting and now this lady.

The professionally produced thumbnail nonsense and that stupid look on her face.

Lefties....when you're too ugly to get laid by who you want, pretend you're smart and "believe" in science.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: D71
You sound fairly passionate about it for someone who doesn't care.

The mathematician cited (Valentina Zharkova) said:

Good thing too! How likely is this mathematician's theory? It's important to understand that she's not a scientist or physist in solar dynmanics. She is using the number of sunspots recorded to try and predict when there will be exceedly few. Her paper doesn't state the degree of confidence so one might think of it as a best guess. She does say:


NASA has a lot to say about it here, but in short: There Is No Impending 'Mini Ice Age'


That's a little hard to believe. Even Valentia published on a government website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). If it's all as you say, why would they have published her paper?


Says the person who doesn't understand what they quoted. Perhaps this will help you....

Oh gee he is referencing climate change "scientists".
Which one of them is doing research that would put them out of a job? You know, coming to any other conclusion than nodding along with the other alarmists?

"While scientists continue to research whether an extended solar minimum could have contributed to cooling the climate, there is little evidence that the Maunder Minimum sparked the Little Ice Age, or at least not entirely by itself (notably, the Little Ice Age began before the Maunder Minimum). Current theories on what caused the Little Ice Age consider that a variety of events could have contributed, with natural fluctuations in ocean circulation, changes in land use by humans and cooling from a less active sun also playing roles; overall, cooling caused by volcanic aerosols likely played the title role."

So they dont have a fucking clue what happened 400 years ago and can only throw wild guesses at it llke a blindfolded dart player but theyre absolutely positively 100% unequivocably certain that they know whats doing it now.

Sounds like real objective science.
 
There should be a law that people should drive whatever works for them and government officials who all own homes with garages and huge carbon footprints should butt out and stop telling us this bullshit that their tesla is saving the planet.

Ill remind people that the carbon cost of creating this vast charging infrastructure required by EVs for mass adoption has never been calculated by anyone thus the claim they are better for climate change is a bald faced lie and promoted by ideologues who are either clueless, dishonest, or both. Look at any public charging station array and give us an accurate figure on how many man hours were expended in digging the trenches for cables... Mining the copper for those cables... The petrochemicals used to insulate them... The diesel used for heavy equipment... The concrete used to pave it over... The resources and energy for the chargers themselves... Upgrading the generating and distribution grid... All of this just part of whats involved.
 
Oh gee he is referencing climate change "scientists".
Which one of them is doing research that would put them out of a job? You know, coming to any other conclusion than nodding along with the other alarmists?

"While scientists continue to research whether an extended solar minimum could have contributed to cooling the climate, there is little evidence that the Maunder Minimum sparked the Little Ice Age, or at least not entirely by itself (notably, the Little Ice Age began before the Maunder Minimum). Current theories on what caused the Little Ice Age consider that a variety of events could have contributed, with natural fluctuations in ocean circulation, changes in land use by humans and cooling from a less active sun also playing roles; overall, cooling caused by volcanic aerosols likely played the title role."

So they dont have a fucking clue what happened 400 years ago and can only throw wild guesses at it llke a blindfolded dart player but theyre absolutely positively 100% unequivocably certain that they know whats doing it now.

Sounds like real objective science.

Isn't it weird how what libtards call the truth aka the "science", changes all the time?

It's important to remind them that if their "science" had to updated, it means they were wrong about shit for the entire time and by extension are also wrong this time.

In fact, it's almost as if the "science" changes to suit the agenda.

It's also weird that when they say science they actually mean the shit that people with official government titles says and not evidence.
 
If every car was "fueled" with a carbon-neutral power source, you only reduce C02 output by about 8.5%
 
Oh gee he is referencing climate change "scientists".
Valentina is the "scientist" you referenced. I just pointed out what she actually said Vs. what her words were twisted to say. Or, if you meant Sabine, she isn't a climate scientist. She's a physicist who tries to make science clear without the gobblygook.

So they dont have a fucking clue what happened 400 years ago and can only throw wild guesses at it llke a blindfolded dart player
The thermometer was invented in in 1654, nearly 400 years ago. So, they might have a clue ... especially since the British were taking and documenting water and air temperatures everywhere their boats went.

but theyre absolutely positively 100% unequivocably certain that they know whats doing it now.
Not Absolutely positive about everything. Real science comes with ranges of accuracies, the IPCC lists those ranges. Some things are unequivocal as they can be directly measured. Some things are nearly certain (e.g., global warming is manmade) as the model predictions have always been within the range of accuracy [ref] and for the reasons Sabine listed above.

You seem emotionally vested, angry in fact, about the topic. Why is that? Is it because someone on YouTube got you spun up about it?

Funny how the scientific videos don't leave an emotional impact and the denier ones leave you with a sense of outrage that makes you want to degrade fellow members. It's the same way politicians spin up their audience to get the results they want...something that makes you emotional isn't to be trusted. Hopefully, if you get nothing else from Sabine's videos, you will realize that the theory is there and sufficiently plausible that reasonably thinking people can honestly believe it.

Climate Change has always been occurring. The evidence strongly points to mankind's GHGs accelerating warming and Sabine does a good job with it in my prior post. Often a cause for misunderstanding is that the Greenhouse effect is more complicated than you learned in high school, here's a good video explaining it, I hope it helps you.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top