svetz
Works in theory! Practice? That's something else
From the LG 340 spec sheet, we know the panel's collection area must be smaller than 1.645 m^2, 340W, and 19.8% efficient.
The collection area is somewhat of a guess based on the panel's physical dimensions ... but should be smaller than 1.645.
Do the numbers work out?
At STC's 1000W/m^2 the panel "sees" 1000x1.645 = ~1645 W due to its size. The calculation is total watts collected * eff = watts panel generates.
Since its rated 340 watts and 19.8% efficient the actual collection surface must be 340 / 19.8% = 1717 m^2. Eh? Bigger can't be right.
Going the other way, the efficiency would be 340/1645 = ~20%. Something isn't adding up. Is LG understating their efficiency? If you know why please explain.
What about Real Life?
One of my panels is currently reporting lastReportWatts: 167 W.
A nearby weather station reports current solar radiation at 521.8 watts/m². So, how does real life compare (keep in mind this is NOT at STC, instead 78 °F and 77% humidity)? (The local weather station was a wunderground station see @jasonhc73 's post How much "Sun" do you actually get? )
167 W * 1000 / 1645 / 521.8 = 19.46% efficiency at real-life conditions. Wow! Not shabby at all for 10:17 AM.
It would be interesting to do this adding in the Pmax temperature coefficient.
If you have panels, what type of panels do you have and what real-world efficiency do you see?
The collection area is somewhat of a guess based on the panel's physical dimensions ... but should be smaller than 1.645.
Do the numbers work out?
At STC's 1000W/m^2 the panel "sees" 1000x1.645 = ~1645 W due to its size. The calculation is total watts collected * eff = watts panel generates.
Since its rated 340 watts and 19.8% efficient the actual collection surface must be 340 / 19.8% = 1717 m^2. Eh? Bigger can't be right.
Going the other way, the efficiency would be 340/1645 = ~20%. Something isn't adding up. Is LG understating their efficiency? If you know why please explain.
What about Real Life?
One of my panels is currently reporting lastReportWatts: 167 W.
A nearby weather station reports current solar radiation at 521.8 watts/m². So, how does real life compare (keep in mind this is NOT at STC, instead 78 °F and 77% humidity)? (The local weather station was a wunderground station see @jasonhc73 's post How much "Sun" do you actually get? )
167 W * 1000 / 1645 / 521.8 = 19.46% efficiency at real-life conditions. Wow! Not shabby at all for 10:17 AM.
It would be interesting to do this adding in the Pmax temperature coefficient.
If you have panels, what type of panels do you have and what real-world efficiency do you see?
Last edited: