I think if the total OCV and max Amps is within spec you are fine.On my 6000XP PV1 and PV2 inputs, is it OK to parallel my one PV feed to them? Meaning, can I take my one PV input from my panels, then use a Y Branch parallel adapter to feed both PV1 and PV2 inputs? Is there any downside? I hope I'm being clear enough here so you can understand my question. Thanks.
I don't think so. But maybe @EG4_Jared can answer your question.On my 6000XP PV1 and PV2 inputs, is it OK to parallel my one PV feed to them? Meaning, can I take my one PV input from my panels, then use a Y Branch parallel adapter to feed both PV1 and PV2 inputs? Is there any downside? I hope I'm being clear enough here so you can understand my question. Thanks.
Yeah I don't think so either. You wouldn't want 2 MPPT's both trying to track from the same string. What sort of advantage are you looking to gain?On my 6000XP PV1 and PV2 inputs, is it OK to parallel my one PV feed to them? Meaning, can I take my one PV input from my panels, then use a Y Branch parallel adapter to feed both PV1 and PV2 inputs? Is there any downside? I hope I'm being clear enough here so you can understand my question. Thanks.
Yes, agree, the manual doesn't give a clear explanation. I'm reading my manual now, on page 23 under COMMON SETTINGS. It does have this: "PV Input Mode: This allows the user to select the PV source for the Inverter. This can be: 0: DC source mode, 3: Two MPPT connects to same string, or 4: Two MPPT connects to different string.". (Note: There does not seem to be an APPLICATION SETTING page that I can access to make changes on)2Yeah I don't think so either. You wouldn't want 2 MPPT's both trying to track from the same string. What sort of advantage are you looking to gain?
There is setting 2 - "PV input mode". You can set that to "P=same string input for 2 MPPTs". The manual doesn't really explain how that setting works - if you would wire the string to one of the MPPT inputs or perhaps that setting would require doing what you are suggesting - using branch connectors to split the strings and connect the one string to both inputs. Perhaps that setting would prevent the 2 MPPT's from being able to track separately. I haven't heard anyone discuss the scenario where that would be helpful though. Maybe if more than 17 amps are available on the string, each MPPT would pull half the available amps?
Sure looks like you can set it to parallel the MPPT inputs, I would think they then track together rather than separately.Update: Again, in the manual on page 47, #2... it has this:
"PV Input Type:S=two independent strings, P=same string input for 2 MPPTs. Default: S"
So the way I'm reading this, I CAN use my one string (same string) to feed both PV1 and PV2.
My panels are all rated identically and angled exactly the same.If the single string is within the Voc and current limits then why would you want to split it?
If it is above spec then split it.
When paralleling one string into the 2 mppt’s half the string’s current should go to each of the two so I would think that would allow a single string with more than 17 amps, yeah.My panels are all rated identically and angled exactly the same.
I recently split my 10s string into two 5s configuration using two MPPTs and it’s making way more power.
Reason behind my decision was shading. Before splitting, the whole string would get dragged down, but now only half will be affected while the others work full bore.
But, yes that’s a good question regarding how the inverter parallels the two strings. Does it allow current greater than 17A?
Curious how that would compare, output wise, to the same panels in 2 strings? It just seems like 2 MPPT's sharing a single string would cause sharing issuesWhen paralleling one string into the 2 mppt’s half the string’s current should go to each of the two so I would think that would allow a single string with more than 17 amps, yeah.
I agree from a power loss perspective it would be better to split the array into 2 and have separate strings rather than pushing more amps on a single string pair. The 6000XP seems to be designed to be able to do what he is asking about though, so I don't think it would cause issues, per se.Curious how that would compare, output wise, to the same panels in 2 strings? It just seems like 2 MPPT's sharing a single string would cause sharing issues
I'm confused on the solar inputs on the eg4 6000xp. Can each mppt handle 17 amps? Someone from sig solar told me it was 17 per input and someone else told me it was combined.
I also notice in the specs that you cannot charge the batteries at 8000 watts you can only charge max 7000 watts 125 max charge current times battery voltage 56 = 7000 watts.The MPPT is rated for a usable 17a per MPPT with a max short circuit of 25a. The max VOC will be 480 per MPPT as well. These MPPT's do not combine to grant a wider range, however, can have PV panels paralleled at the MPPT.
Specs are in post 12The MPPT is rated for a usable 17a per MPPT with a max short circuit of 25a. The max VOC will be 480 per MPPT as well. These MPPT's do not combine to grant a wider range, however, can have PV panels paralleled at the MPPT.