Next time do your homework and at least get the saying right.
Possible increase of heart attack risk after mRNA vaccine.
- Thread starter noenegdod
- Start date
In other words, you got nothing! I have no respect for conspiracy theorists especially when they are passing misinformation that will kill people. You tell us to do our homework?!!!!!!!!!!!! You have nothing. "if i post what I have then it will disappear as in scrubbed from the net". LOL. Yeah okay. Crawl back in your cave and don't forget your tinfoil hat!
MurphyGuy
It just needs a bigger hammer
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Messages
- 4,129
I suspect if you had done your homework in science class, you'd be saying something different.
LOL....you think he actually went to science class!
So last time you said Mrna vaccine deaths are ten x higher? Your numbers were 8 million US deaths due to vaccine. This time you are saying only 2% of events are reported so the number of deaths attributable the vaccine exceeds the US population? So we are all dead? Actually, that explains alot.
Populations in developed nations were already dropping, suggesting this pandemic is planned is nonsense.
Wealth is always transferred, we do not live forever. However if you think that the rise in the Gini coefficient is sustainable, you are quite mistaken.
Depends on the website, some are actively removing misinformation that could lead to death.
If it is a FACT as you claim it is, you will have links to reputable sites for the evidence.
Business leaders are rewarded for maximizing profits, some of them will do so ethically, others not so much. The way the political system in the US works is that you have companies that receive millions in direct subsidies, funding the campaigns of politicians friendly to handing out the subsidies. Unlike the voters they try to convince the other party is bad, the companies don't care which party the candidates belong to.
Last edited:
Not only is the Biden administration competent enough to hide 7.8 million deaths there is no evidence of 200,000 deaths related to MRNA vaccines. But facts do not matter to conspiracy theorists, they never have and they never will.
Back on topic
Serious adverse events associated with receipt of new vaccines targeting COVID‑19 are of high interest to the public. All vaccines that are administered via intramuscular injection, including COVID‑19 vaccines, have side effects related to the mild trauma associated with the procedure and introduction of a foreign substance into the body. These include soreness, redness, rash, and inflammation at the injection site. Other common side effects include fatigue, headache, myalgia (muscle pain), and arthralgia (joint pain) which generally re
solve within a few days.
One less-frequent side effect (that generally occurs in less than 1 in 1,000 people) is hypersensitivity (allergy) to one or more of the vaccine's ingredients, which in some rare cases may cause anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis has occurred in approximately 2 to 5 people per mil
lion vaccinated in the United States. An increased risk of rare and potentially fatal thrombosis events have been associated in mainly younger female patients, following the administration of the Janssen (Johnson and Johnson) and Oxford-AstraZenica COVID‑19 vaccines. The rate of thrombosis events following vaccination with the Johnson and Johnson and AstraZeneca vaccines has been estimated at 1 case per 100,000 vaccinations compared to between 0.22 to 1.57 cases per 100,000 per year in the general population. There is no increased risk for thrombotic events after vaccination with mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines like Pfizer and Moderna.
en.wikipedia.org
Serious adverse events associated with receipt of new vaccines targeting COVID‑19 are of high interest to the public. All vaccines that are administered via intramuscular injection, including COVID‑19 vaccines, have side effects related to the mild trauma associated with the procedure and introduction of a foreign substance into the body. These include soreness, redness, rash, and inflammation at the injection site. Other common side effects include fatigue, headache, myalgia (muscle pain), and arthralgia (joint pain) which generally re
solve within a few days.
One less-frequent side effect (that generally occurs in less than 1 in 1,000 people) is hypersensitivity (allergy) to one or more of the vaccine's ingredients, which in some rare cases may cause anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis has occurred in approximately 2 to 5 people per mil
lion vaccinated in the United States. An increased risk of rare and potentially fatal thrombosis events have been associated in mainly younger female patients, following the administration of the Janssen (Johnson and Johnson) and Oxford-AstraZenica COVID‑19 vaccines. The rate of thrombosis events following vaccination with the Johnson and Johnson and AstraZeneca vaccines has been estimated at 1 case per 100,000 vaccinations compared to between 0.22 to 1.57 cases per 100,000 per year in the general population. There is no increased risk for thrombotic events after vaccination with mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines like Pfizer and Moderna.
COVID-19 vaccine - Wikipedia
BuffaloTrace
Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2020
- Messages
- 449
I always love double negatives when actually typed out and read. Because i know what you mean, but not by the the way it was actually said lol.
Yes. VAERS reports incidents and then they look for causation. J and J and AstraZenica were paused due to incidents of thrombosis mostly in younger women. These are the very limited death events with uncertain causation but still a warning for the at-risk population. (All of this undermines the talking point that VAERS is ignored. )Back on topic
Serious adverse events associated with receipt of new vaccines targeting COVID‑19 are of high interest to the public. All vaccines that are administered via intramuscular injection, including COVID‑19 vaccines, have side effects related to the mild trauma associated with the procedure and introduction of a foreign substance into the body. These include soreness, redness, rash, and inflammation at the injection site. Other common side effects include fatigue, headache, myalgia (muscle pain), and arthralgia (joint pain) which generally re
solve within a few days.
One less-frequent side effect (that generally occurs in less than 1 in 1,000 people) is hypersensitivity (allergy) to one or more of the vaccine's ingredients, which in some rare cases may cause anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis has occurred in approximately 2 to 5 people per mil
lion vaccinated in the United States. An increased risk of rare and potentially fatal thrombosis events have been associated in mainly younger female patients, following the administration of the Janssen (Johnson and Johnson) and Oxford-AstraZenica COVID‑19 vaccines. The rate of thrombosis events following vaccination with the Johnson and Johnson and AstraZeneca vaccines has been estimated at 1 case per 100,000 vaccinations compared to between 0.22 to 1.57 cases per 100,000 per year in the general population. There is no increased risk for thrombotic events after vaccination with mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines like Pfizer and Moderna.
COVID-19 vaccine - Wikipedia
MRNA vaccine has caused no deaths but has been suspected of causing transitory myocarditis in the young male population.
I read some of the post...pretty much confirms, lots of people out there prejudiced with ill informed views.
I do know several of the elders where I lived died right after their Covid shots. Which regardless of if it killed them or not it doesn't change how the Native Population viewed the "vaccine". I'd hardly call them Trump supporters btw.
My real problem is the ones who died were right on deaths door regardless. Who in their right minds would have given them a shot like that?
I got pretty sick right after my shot, which was done thru what AOC calls elite health care. (was months later) I had a appointment with them over other issues but it was just days after being very sick and tried to get them to do a Covid test. No matter who much I asked, they simply would not. Said my vaccine made it moot (me getting Covid).
So, this is all Government ran health care/doctors. Why not test? Why? If I had been positive it would have added to the science. If I had not, would have also.
So, for all those who say "follow the science" you should realize the science is sometimes what others say.
Do you think the old native people who died got a proper review? No.
Doesn't change though that some people showed how ill viewed they are on others in this thread. Name calling, complete ignorance on who and why some people would shy away from a vaccine. Just throw out more name calling at the rest is moot?
I once was given the task to fly helicopters thru different countries and over hundreds of miles for new paint jobs or we could have had them painted 25 miles away. As it was better for them to be painted 300+ miles away but would be far more expensive I showed it to be as cheap to get them done there.... Simply cause soldiers should get what they deserve (proper equipment), regardless of cost. I know all to well how "data" can be manipulated, as, I was great at it.
Knowing a persons "political" agenda is important in life.
Sadly politicians used Covid as a political grinding stone, and it cost us dearly....thats reality.
I do know several of the elders where I lived died right after their Covid shots. Which regardless of if it killed them or not it doesn't change how the Native Population viewed the "vaccine". I'd hardly call them Trump supporters btw.
My real problem is the ones who died were right on deaths door regardless. Who in their right minds would have given them a shot like that?
I got pretty sick right after my shot, which was done thru what AOC calls elite health care. (was months later) I had a appointment with them over other issues but it was just days after being very sick and tried to get them to do a Covid test. No matter who much I asked, they simply would not. Said my vaccine made it moot (me getting Covid).
So, this is all Government ran health care/doctors. Why not test? Why? If I had been positive it would have added to the science. If I had not, would have also.
So, for all those who say "follow the science" you should realize the science is sometimes what others say.
Do you think the old native people who died got a proper review? No.
Doesn't change though that some people showed how ill viewed they are on others in this thread. Name calling, complete ignorance on who and why some people would shy away from a vaccine. Just throw out more name calling at the rest is moot?
I once was given the task to fly helicopters thru different countries and over hundreds of miles for new paint jobs or we could have had them painted 25 miles away. As it was better for them to be painted 300+ miles away but would be far more expensive I showed it to be as cheap to get them done there.... Simply cause soldiers should get what they deserve (proper equipment), regardless of cost. I know all to well how "data" can be manipulated, as, I was great at it.
Knowing a persons "political" agenda is important in life.
Sadly politicians used Covid as a political grinding stone, and it cost us dearly....thats reality.
I love how he says he did not disrespect us and the opening line of his first post says if we support the vaccine " maybe a quick visit to a psychiatrist is in order" So respectful!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The idea of "you are going to die soon anyway so we are not going to give you the vaccine" is unnecessary cruel considering that those people who chose to try to extend their lives. The vaccines are relatively cheap, something in the order of 3 dollars (US) per dose.
There are some communities in the US that have very good reason to doubt the intent of government, very much so on health issues, and the Native American population is on the top of that list. This torrent of conspiracy and misinformation unfortunately just exacerbates that situation. The vaccines were tested in the elderly and vulnerable and shown to be tolerated. They were the first vaccinated because they were the most vulnerable with many of them residing in community housing. There are no easy answers in that situation but the virus clearly presented an extreme risk to that population.
This whole thing has really revealed a deep callousness of the elderly, disabled, and immune-compromised. As though we can value their lives as worth less since to acknowledge them would inconvenience us.
Shale MacGregor
Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2021
- Messages
- 641
Wow... You are straight up insane. With crispr you don't think they could have done a better job than COVID?
We don't have complete automation yet, wait for your plandemic when the rich can replace all of the poor people with robots, not while they still depend on them to earn them money. As part of the 1% we are waiting on this major breakthrough before we kill you all off you daft fanny.
I don't think they are that evil, gullible or deluded to think they know better than the experts, sure.
BuffaloTrace
Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2020
- Messages
- 449
Looks like Anaphylaxis was covered in some if the foia released documents by the FDA on page 10:Back on topic
Serious adverse events associated with receipt of new vaccines targeting COVID‑19 are of high interest to the public. All vaccines that are administered via intramuscular injection, including COVID‑19 vaccines, have side effects related to the mild trauma associated with the procedure and introduction of a foreign substance into the body. These include soreness, redness, rash, and inflammation at the injection site. Other common side effects include fatigue, headache, myalgia (muscle pain), and arthralgia (joint pain) which generally re
solve within a few days.
One less-frequent side effect (that generally occurs in less than 1 in 1,000 people) is hypersensitivity (allergy) to one or more of the vaccine's ingredients, which in some rare cases may cause anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis has occurred in approximately 2 to 5 people per mil
lion vaccinated in the United States. An increased risk of rare and potentially fatal thrombosis events have been associated in mainly younger female patients, following the administration of the Janssen (Johnson and Johnson) and Oxford-AstraZenica COVID‑19 vaccines. The rate of thrombosis events following vaccination with the Johnson and Johnson and AstraZeneca vaccines has been estimated at 1 case per 100,000 vaccinations compared to between 0.22 to 1.57 cases per 100,000 per year in the general population. There is no increased risk for thrombotic events after vaccination with mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines like Pfizer and Moderna.
COVID-19 vaccine - Wikipedia
The document below gives the definition of Brighton collaboration values mean:
According to the released document there were 4 deaths out of almost 43k post Vaccination, but health factors could have played a role of course. The other 1000+ anaphylaxis cases are outlined under the Brighton Collaboration values.
The Pfizer vaccine does seem to have historically high cases of anaphylaxis compared to the 2-5 per million vaccine wide.
Shale MacGregor
Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2021
- Messages
- 641
I think new zealand claims one death due to heart attack from mRNA but still needs investigation.
Shale MacGregor
Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2021
- Messages
- 641
You mean when nursing home workers had a 40% vaccination rate while the virus and vaccine had low risk to them but super high risk to those whose welfare they were entrusted with?