Yes. Last weekend I filled up here:Eh, compared to what? Have you looked at fuel prices lately?
![NMCcAOEl.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/NMCcAOEl.jpg)
Should the US stop imports and exports of oil and refined products? Let the price rise so the frackers can get busy again?
Yes. Last weekend I filled up here:Eh, compared to what? Have you looked at fuel prices lately?
No. I am talking about physical products like the OP example. If the product contains technology, I don't know.Are you talking technology, and where it is made, which is arguably related to DIY solar power, or are you hijacking this thread as a platform for attacking "the enemy" of some hidden political agenda?
Well, that company puts out two models, one made overseas and one here. Handy, if we may safely assume that they are approximately competent, and honest, in their pricing. Another issue is how good the design really is at making the product fit for purpose. I don't know, which is why I've been thinking about this phone for a while, but not buying, yet.And that phone is exactly the problem. I can buy a very high quality Samsung for less than 1/4 of the price, and the Samsung's specs are significantly better. I'm sure it's a great quality phone, but is it really 4x better than a Galaxy S10?
As much as I WANT to buy U.S made stuff, I simply can't justify the price.
Straw man fallacy. No one has proposed banning imported oil as a solution. In fact, the cause of the price rise is obviously the banning of domestic production projects. Your comment is ridiculously false.Yes. Last weekend I filled up here:
![]()
Should the US stop imports and exports of oil and refined products? Let the price rise so the frackers can get busy again?
That assertion is false. My question refers directly to your comment which uses the (commonly derogative, in many circles) term "MAGA agenda". Is that a physical product?No. I am talking about physical products like the OP example. If the product contains technology, I don't know.
How can my statement be false? All I said was I was aware of fuel prices and gave an example. Are you saying I need to post a receipt?Straw man fallacy. No one has proposed banning imported oil as a solution. In fact, the cause of the price rise is obviously the banning of domestic production projects. Your comment is ridiculously false.
I'm saying that if you purport to rebut the substance of my argument, you should do so with fact and evidence, not with straw man fallacy and obvious false suggestions that more foreign trade is the answer to price rises caused by government policy shutting down domestic production.How can my statement be false? All I said was I was aware of fuel prices and gave an example. Are you saying I need to post a receipt?
For example, what about lithium mining? Isn't mining, substantially, suppressed in the US not by "corporate greed" but by careless, uninformed, regulation? Mining can be a tough business. Does that mean we should all, while sipping our soy, demand that no mining in which it is possible that things which are not nice can happen be allowed in the country? Where will that end?I'm saying that if you purport to rebut the substance of my argument, you should do so with fact and evidence, not with straw man fallacy and obvious false suggestions that more foreign trade is the answer to price rises caused by government policy shutting down domestic production.
BTW, the petroleum industry is an obvious counter-example to assumptions (if any) that corporate greed and consumer blindness will make the return of industry to the US impossible. in fact, there is every reason to assume that the petroleum industry will produce, if allowed. Let's not assume that there are no other domestic industries ready to do that, given conditions which make it possible.
Mining is not suppressed in the US. But competing interests play a role, economically, environmentally, politically. Keep in mind, 'economically' does not mean 'short sighted destructive exploitation'. Regulation is not careless or uninformed, but has to combine and integrate and find a way that fits many and looks into the future, a middle ground, a compromise. That's where it can end.For example, what about lithium mining? Isn't mining, substantially, suppressed in the US not by "corporate greed" but by careless, uninformed, regulation? Mining can be a tough business. Does that mean we should all, while sipping our soy, demand that no mining in which it is possible that things which are not nice can happen be allowed in the country? Where will that end?
Jeez, do we even live in the same country?! That's wild, it was less than $3 a gallon last week here in TN, now it's still under $4. The most I ever paid was around $5 a gallon while Obama was doing his thing.Yes. Last weekend I filled up here:
![]()
Should the US stop imports and exports of oil and refined products? Let the price rise so the frackers can get busy again?
You haven't seen anything yet........Jeez, do we even live in the same country?! That's wild, it was less than $3 a gallon last week here in TN, now it's still under $4. The most I ever paid was around $5 a gallon while Obama was doing his thing.
I'll rebut that in the same way the "Baron" rebutted my assertion. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Either restrain the regulatory impulse to something approaching sanity, based on fact and evidence, or suffer poverty, decline, and the loss of more or less everything you take for granted. Choose wisely.Mining is not suppressed in the US. But competing interests play a role, economically, environmentally, politically. Keep in mind, 'economically' does not mean 'short sighted destructive exploitation'. Regulation is not careless or uninformed, but has to combine and integrate and find a way that fits many and looks into the future...
Wisodm does not limit itself to minimizing raw material exploitation cost. That is only one substep in a huge chain of value creation, which also includes but is not limited to infratsructure, logistics, environmental impact, decomissioning, recycling, societal considerations and so on. Someone must pay these costs at some point, and uncontrolled predatory exploitation (I believe that what's being advertized, but ofc I may be wrong) may raise them to exorbitant levels, including loss of property and lives. For instance still to freqeunt mining acidents that regularly happen because of mssing control, maintenance and inspection. Sometimes with grave and lasting impact for decades and centuries. That's why a regulation that tries to integrate some of these aspects and work against bribery, despotism and political arbitrarinessis is certainly needed.I'll rebut that in the same way the "Baron" rebutted my assertion. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Either restrain the regulatory impulse to something approaching sanity, based on fact and evidence, or suffer poverty, decline, and the loss of more or less everything you take for granted. Choose wisely.
Straw man fallacy: I didn't claim that minimizing raw material exploitation cost was the only wisdom. No one claimed that, because that would be silly.Wisodm does not limit itself to minimizing raw material exploitation cost. That is only one substep in a huge chain of value creation, which also includes but is not limited to infratsructure, logistics, environmental impact, decomissioning, recycling, societal considerations and so on. Someone must pay these costs at some point, and uncontrolled predatory exploitation (I believe that what's being advertized, but ofc I may be wrong) may raise them to exorbitant levels, including loss of property and lives. For instance still to freqeunt mining acidents that regularly happen because of mssing control, maintenance and inspection. Sometimes with grave and lasting impact for decades and centuries. That's why a regulation that tries to integrate some of these aspects and work against bribery, despotism and political arbitrarinessis is certainly needed.
And then, what happens when resources run out or become too uneconomical to extract at all, which certainly happens earlier in an uncontrolled environment ? Uncontrolled action is prone to greater losses and less efficiency, iow, it doesn't make stuff cheaper, in contrary. It leads to more inequality, as well. I mean, we're all here on the forum because we actually can afford making our own anergy, at reasonable cost.
Economy is a rather complicated conglomerate of interactions, and sometimes opinionated, for sure. Just want to say that there's more to it than might appear at first sight.
The last US made smartphone was for Nextel, manufactured in Plantation Florida. It's been gone for a long time.Where can I buy a US made iPhone?
BTW China does not have a monopoly on poorly manufactured products.
Personally, any technology made in China can easily be manufactured in the USA. I know this because I worked in the USA factories that used to do exactly that for computers and cell phones. We should adopt the same policies as other nations, no selling technology that doesn't have a domestic production partner. If that shoe fits a specific country, so be it.Are you talking technology, and where it is made, which is arguably related to DIY solar power, or are you hijacking this thread as a platform for attacking "the enemy" of some hidden political agenda?
I think it all comes down to whether or not Americans are willing to pay for domestic products, and I think the answer, generally speaking, is no.Personally, any technology made in China can easily be manufactured in the USA. I know this because I worked in the USA factories that used to do exactly that for computers and cell phones. We should adopt the same policies as other nations, no selling technology that doesn't have a domestic production partner. If that shoe fits a specific country, so be it.
So all the people just got to learn to code is that it?Yes for all to be made at quality at home most people would have to give up their standard of living in dealing with increased prices and shortages. Careful wanting to bring all this home. The MAGA agenda would have incredible consequences and hardship.
Exactly why tariffs were invented. To make domestic products comparable to Slave labor grey market products.I think it all comes down to whether or not Americans are willing to pay for domestic products, and I think the answer, generally speaking, is no.
In my personal and professional experience, people always talk about being willing to support an american-made product, but when it comes down to it, and they see a price tag of twice the amount, their wallet starts talking for them. I'm definitely guilty of that too, but my solar system would have been three or four times as much if I stuck with domestic products, and honestly, I probably wouldn't have even started the project for that amount of money.
I just did some looking around to see if I could "rebuild" my system with ONLY U.S made components, and how much it would cost. I'm having trouble finding any components that are manufactured from start to finish here in the states. Even the major brands here are using Asian labor. I'm sure there's exceptions, but I couldn't find any.
I personally believe that any sort of "ban" on products manufactured elsewhere would only open up a black market. People need to be incentivized to buy products made here, not forced. The last thing we need is another 3 letter agency kicking in doors looking for unlicensed Chinese electronics.
I bought a 75amp power supply from a brand named "fat boy" products, with the understanding it was made in usa. About $400+. Opened it up, its 3 25amp chinese power supplies ganged together. Dude just makes the aluminum enclosure, ties em together with a fan, fat pot and voltage display. And isnt even competent at it. Its advertised as a battery charger too but if you leave it connected to the battery and shut it off the fan keeps running.I think it all comes down to whether or not Americans are willing to pay for domestic products, and I think the answer, generally speaking, is no.
In my personal and professional experience, people always talk about being willing to support an american-made product, but when it comes down to it, and they see a price tag of twice the amount, their wallet starts talking for them. I'm definitely guilty of that too, but my solar system would have been three or four times as much if I stuck with domestic products, and honestly, I probably wouldn't have even started the project for that amount of money.
I just did some looking around to see if I could "rebuild" my system with ONLY U.S made components, and how much it would cost. I'm having trouble finding any components that are manufactured from start to finish here in the states. Even the major brands here are using Asian labor. I'm sure there's exceptions, but I couldn't find any.
I personally believe that any sort of "ban" on products manufactured elsewhere would only open up a black market. People need to be incentivized to buy products made here, not forced. The last thing we need is another 3 letter agency kicking in doors looking for unlicensed Chinese electronics.