WOLF-GANG
New Member
Am I right that in this case the SPH uses AC for charging when the 14 panels do provide less than its max. 60A ?
GROWATT SPH 4000: 7 kWp panels (2 strings 7 panels x 500W)
GROWATT MIC 3000: 3,5 kWp panels (7 panels x 500W)
TPM Smartmeter (3 phase smartmeter talking modbus to the inverter)
The SPH might get 100 A from its panels and therefore charges the battery with 60A (which is maximum it can) if 40A are needed for grid.
Now at 5 pm the panels provide just 55 A which then will force the SPH to draw 5A from the grid cause the TPM will tell him about the current fed into the grid every second from a 2nd inverter, maybe a Growatt MIC 3000 with another 7 panels each 500W
If the SPH gets only 40 A from the panels it will draw up to 20A from the grid if available to charge the battery ?
Is that right ?
Then the system would become more efficient as a whole cause for surplus feed into the grid I get only 8 Cent and for that I draw from the grid later I have to pay 38 cent, so it would make sense to use AC charging with even losses of 50% cause I would invest 1,5 kWh or 12 cent just to save 1 kWh later or 38 Cent.
26 Cent saved or won just by such a feature if I got it right.
Would it make sense to increase the battery from 6 kWh if 6 kWh is what is needed during long Winter evenings from 5 pm to 8 am ?
The AC charging will only kick in once the battery is not full so usually in late autumn, winter or early spring, right ?
GROWATT SPH 4000: 7 kWp panels (2 strings 7 panels x 500W)
GROWATT MIC 3000: 3,5 kWp panels (7 panels x 500W)
TPM Smartmeter (3 phase smartmeter talking modbus to the inverter)
The SPH might get 100 A from its panels and therefore charges the battery with 60A (which is maximum it can) if 40A are needed for grid.
Now at 5 pm the panels provide just 55 A which then will force the SPH to draw 5A from the grid cause the TPM will tell him about the current fed into the grid every second from a 2nd inverter, maybe a Growatt MIC 3000 with another 7 panels each 500W
If the SPH gets only 40 A from the panels it will draw up to 20A from the grid if available to charge the battery ?
Is that right ?
Then the system would become more efficient as a whole cause for surplus feed into the grid I get only 8 Cent and for that I draw from the grid later I have to pay 38 cent, so it would make sense to use AC charging with even losses of 50% cause I would invest 1,5 kWh or 12 cent just to save 1 kWh later or 38 Cent.
26 Cent saved or won just by such a feature if I got it right.
Would it make sense to increase the battery from 6 kWh if 6 kWh is what is needed during long Winter evenings from 5 pm to 8 am ?
The AC charging will only kick in once the battery is not full so usually in late autumn, winter or early spring, right ?