Really now. What was Trumps role in the Central Park 5? Tell us exactly what Trump had printed in that newspaper ad.
BYE BYE Tucker...
- Thread starter MurphyGuy
- Start date
Ozark Tinkering
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2021
- Messages
- 1,105
Here you go batshit, follow the link for a copy of the original ad he spent $85,000 on to have in several major newspapers. Fucking clown was 32 years old when this was going on... https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6131533-trumpdeathpenaltyad05011989 and you can do the reading here too; https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-trump-has-said-central-park-five/1501321001/
Im 100% aware of that ad.
Copy and paste the part where any of the names of the suspects or their race were mentioned...
He merely called for strong punishnent of whoever did it. Is that a problem?
Notice how that article doesnt refute Trumps claims.
They were NOT "found innocent" or "exonerated". They were in fact committing violent crimes in the park that night.
And some of the police investigators maintain that these boys were guilty, and made statements of facts only the perpetrators would know.
MurphyGuy
It just needs a bigger hammer
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Messages
- 4,129
Dude.. he thinks we could be "spreading life thru the galaxy with our space probes"..
Now considering that, on what intelligence level do you think he's operating on?
In the unlikely event you prove anything I post wrong, maybe I will let you know.
Give it a rest.
Youre like a five year old who just heard their first dirty word, and now repeat it hundreds of times a day for weeks.
"of less concern, is that such a bacteria could possibly multiply on the planet. Theoretically it might be possible."
----Smurphy
MurphyGuy
It just needs a bigger hammer
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Messages
- 4,129
You're kind of a short bus special aren't you? You don't even have a 5th grade concept of the cosmos...
you would say 2+2=5 and I could give a proof of it equaling 4 and you would still bury your head in the sand, so there is no point
MurphyGuy
It just needs a bigger hammer
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Messages
- 4,129
There is no proving anything to you.. But fortunately for us, we don't actually need to prove anything to you..
I'll just stick this up here and let readers decide for themselves what an idiot you are...
Checkthisout
Solar Wizard
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2021
- Messages
- 5,063
Like 5 people read these threads. You're delusional if you think you have an audience.
MurphyGuy
It just needs a bigger hammer
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Messages
- 4,129
42OhmsPA
What's in a title?
It's the definition of insanity doing the same thing over and over again and expecting the same results?
I hope I'm wrong because that would make Leo and Murph psychotic, the way they hold on to screenshots and repost them....
Nom nom nom enjoy the troll food.
I hope I'm wrong because that would make Leo and Murph psychotic, the way they hold on to screenshots and repost them....
Nom nom nom enjoy the troll food.
MurphyGuy
It just needs a bigger hammer
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Messages
- 4,129
Oh, here we go again.. Spectacular stupidity on display....
You can't even get the basics correct.. but you have opinions on science subjects? WTF?
Wow... I'm kind of speechless at the stupidity level..
No you moron.. the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting DIFFERENT results...
You can't even get the basics correct.. but you have opinions on science subjects? WTF?
Wow... I'm kind of speechless at the stupidity level..
LeoThomson
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2022
- Messages
- 3,469
Ozark Tinkering
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2021
- Messages
- 1,105
Fucking amazing, ain't it?
MurphyGuy
It just needs a bigger hammer
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Messages
- 4,129
It has to be drugs... even religion can't make someone THAT stupid....
Your idiotic and racist by implication post about the central park 5 is essentially that
Last edited:
42OhmsPA
What's in a title?
Good way to start the majority of your posts.
Thanks for answering my question. That '?' symbol at the end is a question mark, people use them when they are unsure of something and would like clarity.
So are you expecting the same or different results posting the same screenshots over and over?
Wow there's that '?' symbol I talked about.. Yes I have opinions on may subjects beyond science.
Wonderful Tucker Facts?
Sure didn't seem to be the case with your long winded reply.
MurphyGuy
It just needs a bigger hammer
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Messages
- 4,129
We both know it was a statement in the form of a rhetorical question.. You'd get more respect if you just owned the mistake instead of trying for a save. That's what Bob does.. don't be a Bob.
Copy and paste the specific points you believe I am wrong about and we will go from there. Support your claims with references because I will when required.
Racist by implication, huh? I never mentioned their race and neither did Trump, anywhere in that ad. Thats a leftist tactic. Any time a crime is committed and a suspect is black, any discussion of the crime by white people will be alleged to be racially motivated.
I dont GAF.
The race of these men was never mentioned by Trump, not in the ad and not ever in any subsequent statements by him.
Yet when asked to provide proof Trump is racist, you people just blurt out "central park 5!!! those poor boys!!!" As if people are too stupid to critically look at Trumps role in this.
It wouldnt have mattered if those thugs were black, latino, asian, or white. His statements would have been the same.
Last edited:
replace anti smite with "X" and this defines you perfectly. No point in engaging beyond this:
“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
― Jean-Paul Sartre
