liliantong
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2021
- Messages
- 3
Hi Everyone,
I am new here, please be kind . I just got around to testing my AC200 (not AC200P) and for the most part it's going well except one smallish thing I noticed. I have an ICECO JP50 and when plugged in but powered off using AC, there is a power draw of 36 watts (same when ICECO is idle). When I unplug from the ICECO itself leaving the cord plugged into the AC200 the power draw is 0 (obviously). I also have the EB150 and it operates as expected: 0 power draw when the ICECO is powered off and plugged in and also when idle. Plugging in the ICECO using DC on the AC200, it behaves as expected and same results as testing with the EB150.
I will definitely be using DC anyway, but I am interested in feedback on why the AC200 draws power from the ICECO when the ICECO is off but plugged in via AC.
BTW, the AC cord for the ICECO doesn't have a brick charger. It just looks like a regular cord normally used for desktop/tower computers back in the day.
Thanks in advance,
Lilian
I am new here, please be kind . I just got around to testing my AC200 (not AC200P) and for the most part it's going well except one smallish thing I noticed. I have an ICECO JP50 and when plugged in but powered off using AC, there is a power draw of 36 watts (same when ICECO is idle). When I unplug from the ICECO itself leaving the cord plugged into the AC200 the power draw is 0 (obviously). I also have the EB150 and it operates as expected: 0 power draw when the ICECO is powered off and plugged in and also when idle. Plugging in the ICECO using DC on the AC200, it behaves as expected and same results as testing with the EB150.
I will definitely be using DC anyway, but I am interested in feedback on why the AC200 draws power from the ICECO when the ICECO is off but plugged in via AC.
BTW, the AC cord for the ICECO doesn't have a brick charger. It just looks like a regular cord normally used for desktop/tower computers back in the day.
Thanks in advance,
Lilian
Last edited: