After the Liitokala disaster I saved some money and ordered 16 Eve 105 (grade A) from nkon.nl hoping that I will avoid any other headache related to quality of the cells.
The cells arrived in two boxes, let's call them Box A and Box B, all around 3.29x V. All QR codes turned out valid on Gobel site and using the Android LifePo4QR reader. I've put Box A through the top balance process using a benchtop power supply, following the top balance tutorial on this forum. It took a week to balance to 3.650 V due to 10 A limitation of the power supply. I've assembled Box A into a battery and things seem good.
I then put Box B through the top balance process and now things started to look weird: as opposed to Box A, the initial charging current started at around 9 A. When Box A was top balacing it started at 9.8-ish A and it took two days to drop to 8 A, which seemed consistent with 105 Ah rating. Now it took just under one hour to get from around 9 A to 7.97 A and under 24 h to drop somewhere in the low 6 A. This does not seem consistent with declared capacity of 105 Ah.
And then I noticed something else: from 8 cells in Box B there is only one with laser etched QR code, all others are stickered. As far as I know Eve uses lasered etched codes only. The cells in Box A all had laser etched QR codes.
So what I suspect is that whoever Nkon bought from sold a batch of doctored cells that pretend to be real Eve 105s while they really could be 90Ks or something else, even 75s, since the physical dimensions are identical between them. The cells looked all new and I didn't notice the QR difference at first due to lighting, late hours and tiredness. I've emailed nkon on the subject and asked to solve this.
I've attached some pictures. In the first picture you can see the Box A while top balancing. When enlarging one can see the QR area is not shiney as there are no stickers there. Better view of this is in the last picture, top is Box A, bottom is Box B, you can see the differences and even spot the single etched QR. Second and third picture show Box B, you can see detail between laser etching and sticker.
LE: there was no test report in the boxes and nothing to identify the cells for warranty purposes.
The cells arrived in two boxes, let's call them Box A and Box B, all around 3.29x V. All QR codes turned out valid on Gobel site and using the Android LifePo4QR reader. I've put Box A through the top balance process using a benchtop power supply, following the top balance tutorial on this forum. It took a week to balance to 3.650 V due to 10 A limitation of the power supply. I've assembled Box A into a battery and things seem good.
I then put Box B through the top balance process and now things started to look weird: as opposed to Box A, the initial charging current started at around 9 A. When Box A was top balacing it started at 9.8-ish A and it took two days to drop to 8 A, which seemed consistent with 105 Ah rating. Now it took just under one hour to get from around 9 A to 7.97 A and under 24 h to drop somewhere in the low 6 A. This does not seem consistent with declared capacity of 105 Ah.
And then I noticed something else: from 8 cells in Box B there is only one with laser etched QR code, all others are stickered. As far as I know Eve uses lasered etched codes only. The cells in Box A all had laser etched QR codes.
So what I suspect is that whoever Nkon bought from sold a batch of doctored cells that pretend to be real Eve 105s while they really could be 90Ks or something else, even 75s, since the physical dimensions are identical between them. The cells looked all new and I didn't notice the QR difference at first due to lighting, late hours and tiredness. I've emailed nkon on the subject and asked to solve this.
I've attached some pictures. In the first picture you can see the Box A while top balancing. When enlarging one can see the QR area is not shiney as there are no stickers there. Better view of this is in the last picture, top is Box A, bottom is Box B, you can see the differences and even spot the single etched QR. Second and third picture show Box B, you can see detail between laser etching and sticker.
LE: there was no test report in the boxes and nothing to identify the cells for warranty purposes.
Attachments
Last edited: