I'm trying to help a neighbor with a small 12v solar system for his cabin. He ended up running his batteries down after blowing a fuse on the cable between the SCC and the batteries. We think he may have blown the fuse by using a battery charger ran off a generator while the batteries were also being charged by the SCC, but really not sure why it blew.... might have been a third panel he added... more about that below.
He bought his panels, SCC, batteries and inverter through a local Amish business. The SCC came with 10' of PV cable/MC4 connectors attached and about 5' battery out cable with alligator clips attached, all wire 10awg (2/0 from batteries to inverter). The Amish supplier drew him a picture of how to wire everything.... and he chose to have him parallel the 2 panels. The neighbor went back a week later and the guy sold him one more panel, it too to be wired in parallel, said he though that would be ok.
Specifics:
Panels: 240watt VOC 37.0, VMP 29.9, ISC 8.59, IMP 8.03
SCC: Temank 40a, 100v, 550w max @12v MPPT
Inverter: Aims 2000/4000 12vdc
Batteries: 2 x 420ah Trojan 6v wired series for 12v
So with only a 10' wire run from the panels to the SCC line loss would be minimal. But, I guess my inclination would to be to series the two panels and let the MPPT SCC convert the extra voltage to amps to charge the batteries. QUESTION: Does it make that much difference in this case? With these panels in series he is looking at around 16amps input/output for charging... correct?
Now for that 3rd panel...he had added it in parallel but took it off when problems began. After looking at his energy usage I calculated that he would use roughly 12% each day (if he shuts the satellite internet off at night, 20%+ if he runs that 24/7.... I think he will be shutting it off now.) Where we are in the mountains he get ~5 - 6 hours a day of charging sunlight. (For the following I based my figures on seriesed panels so I'm guessing paralleled might be different? Showing my solar math ignorance! See below. ) Figuring an average of about 19 amps charging current (conservative I hope) I'm coming up with about ~5.7hrs for charge/absorption. If he added that 3rd panel in series - it would definitely require a new 60/150 SCC - he could charge back up in about ~4.7hrs. PLEASE CHECK MY MATH. In a parallel configuration 2 panels should provide ~16amps for charging so, ~6.15hrs. With 3 in parallel, ~21amps or, ~5.4hrs. Really uncertain on these numbers.
With the 3 in parallel he would be coming really close or at 100% charge each day the sun shines, if my math is correct. The SCC is 40a so good there at ~21amps, in parallel the voltage would stay ~30.0 (his SCC today was reading 34.2v coming in) so not exceeding the 100v in the specs, BUT.... with 3 240w panels in parallel this comes to 720w, far exceeding the specified 550w max. Does this matter if the amps and voltage are well within specs?
I really don't want to mess up his equipment, if it were mine I'd go for it! Is there a better way this system could be set up.
Thanks for the help!
He bought his panels, SCC, batteries and inverter through a local Amish business. The SCC came with 10' of PV cable/MC4 connectors attached and about 5' battery out cable with alligator clips attached, all wire 10awg (2/0 from batteries to inverter). The Amish supplier drew him a picture of how to wire everything.... and he chose to have him parallel the 2 panels. The neighbor went back a week later and the guy sold him one more panel, it too to be wired in parallel, said he though that would be ok.
Specifics:
Panels: 240watt VOC 37.0, VMP 29.9, ISC 8.59, IMP 8.03
SCC: Temank 40a, 100v, 550w max @12v MPPT
Inverter: Aims 2000/4000 12vdc
Batteries: 2 x 420ah Trojan 6v wired series for 12v
So with only a 10' wire run from the panels to the SCC line loss would be minimal. But, I guess my inclination would to be to series the two panels and let the MPPT SCC convert the extra voltage to amps to charge the batteries. QUESTION: Does it make that much difference in this case? With these panels in series he is looking at around 16amps input/output for charging... correct?
Now for that 3rd panel...he had added it in parallel but took it off when problems began. After looking at his energy usage I calculated that he would use roughly 12% each day (if he shuts the satellite internet off at night, 20%+ if he runs that 24/7.... I think he will be shutting it off now.) Where we are in the mountains he get ~5 - 6 hours a day of charging sunlight. (For the following I based my figures on seriesed panels so I'm guessing paralleled might be different? Showing my solar math ignorance! See below. ) Figuring an average of about 19 amps charging current (conservative I hope) I'm coming up with about ~5.7hrs for charge/absorption. If he added that 3rd panel in series - it would definitely require a new 60/150 SCC - he could charge back up in about ~4.7hrs. PLEASE CHECK MY MATH. In a parallel configuration 2 panels should provide ~16amps for charging so, ~6.15hrs. With 3 in parallel, ~21amps or, ~5.4hrs. Really uncertain on these numbers.
With the 3 in parallel he would be coming really close or at 100% charge each day the sun shines, if my math is correct. The SCC is 40a so good there at ~21amps, in parallel the voltage would stay ~30.0 (his SCC today was reading 34.2v coming in) so not exceeding the 100v in the specs, BUT.... with 3 240w panels in parallel this comes to 720w, far exceeding the specified 550w max. Does this matter if the amps and voltage are well within specs?
I really don't want to mess up his equipment, if it were mine I'd go for it! Is there a better way this system could be set up.
Thanks for the help!