littleharbor2
Solar Addict
Imagine combining two different songs on one set of speaker wire then thinking you can split it apart and get the tunes to come out sounding right. Something like that....
I'm just the messenger at this point. kromc5 did this with the input from Signature Solar. Go ask them about it. It was their idea and it does work.I would never recommend doing that. If, something happens to one mppt, the other will be way overloaded. Which could leave you with nothing.
Just because it seems like it will work, doesn't make it right or safe. But as I said, it's a free world.
Actually, you have no idea how the audio travels down a single pair of speaker wires, yet can produce sound. Proves the point actually.Imagine combining two different songs on one set of speaker wire then thinking you can split it apart and get the tunes to come out sounding right. Something like that....
I agree, that's why you should try it first.It saves me money, when I learn from other people's mistakes. So, I have no problem with others trying things out.
AgreedI agree, that's why you should try it first.
I've been waiting for kromc5 to say he has had a SCC failure but it hasn't happened yet. If one fails 5 years from now, will it be due to the parallel connection from PV or attributed to something else? What about 10 years, 20 years?
People say things can't be done, yet we find where someone has done it. Just throwing it out there, your results may vary. Considering some here believe Sig Solar walks on water, drink the Kool Aid they mix and recommend buying the ES5000 inverter with an auto transformer, yet question the fact James told kromc5 to wire Y's to run parallel SCC's seems a little strange.
I take everything they recommend with a grain of salt, actually throw large handfuls over my shoulder, but they may or may not be correct on this one. Time has a way of correcting mistakes or proving myths unsubstantiated.
well I don't see why (and I've tested them) ... as it happens I have a background in electronics which goes back some decades (doesn't exclude me from making mistakes) and I can't see what it is that might be considered a problem with carrying up to their rated current and then (appropriately) disconnecting when exceeding it.@pellicle , those circuit breakers look very similar to one that a forum member posted about last year. It was causing havoc in his system. Those breakers may be good for car audio but I would never use them in a PV/LiFePO4 system.
this is often said, but without context its hard to accept. Now if we are talking about planning based "that won't work for me" caused by specification issues then sure, but if one argues that it doesn't work one should be able to provide some rationale for why.What works for one person, doesn't always work for another.
There was context, in the conversation.this is often said, but without context its hard to accept. Now if we are talking about planning based "that won't work for me" caused by specification issues then sure, but if one argues that it doesn't work one should be able to provide some rationale for why.
Maybe they did ... ?
PS: to give an example I have a 250W panel and 90Ah of 24V FLA powering my shed, if someone says "that won't work for me" and they have an industrial premise doing welding and whatnot then "of course it won't" ... but then that's context.
I see that some seem to be rated for up to 42 vdc. But also look to be intended for car audio.
It is interesting that many claim this or that won't work but won't push the envelope to see for themselves if the "myth" is true or not.this is often said, but without context its hard to accept. Now if we are talking about planning based "that won't work for me" caused by specification issues then sure, but if one argues that it doesn't work one should be able to provide some rationale for why.
Maybe they did ... ?
PS: to give an example I have a 250W panel and 90Ah of 24V FLA powering my shed, if someone says "that won't work for me" and they have an industrial premise doing welding and whatnot then "of course it won't" ... but then that's context.
agreed ... and if the magic smoke doesn't come out then "it worked" ;-)It is interesting that many claim this or that won't work but won't push the envelope to see for themselves if the "myth" is true or not.
They are. The experienced guys will tell you those type of cheapo breakers can create a lot of heat and resistance, and are prone to fail.
If you want a cheapo switchable breaker the Eaton Busman ones are recommended. Sure they cost twice as much, but they also work better. But yeah, for main feed to lifepo4, using a classT has been implored for safety.
View attachment 86825
Bottom line with these breakers is they are RARELY rated over 32V… so, useless for any but the smallest 12V PV wiring…Personally, I have never used the cheapo car audio breakers in any PV/battery system. I was going through some stuff yesterday and came across 4 of them that somehow I ended up with. I was trying out the action of them and found not one acted the same as another one. Hitting the test button only released one lever, the others wouldn't snap open. Another wouldn't lock closed. They have an overall cheap feel to them.
MorningPersonally, I have never used the cheapo car audio breakers in any PV/battery system. I was going through some stuff yesterday and came across 4 of them that somehow I ended up with. I was trying out the action of them and found not one acted the same as another one. Hitting the test button only released one lever, the others wouldn't snap open. Another wouldn't lock closed. They have an overall cheap feel to them.
perhaps people are unable to read "find something similar" and instead read it as "you should totally buy these"I agree with all the answers, but my question is "why wouldn't you"
I put in a 20A DC circuit breaker which can also be manually tripped (this one) on each of my DC circuits (panel to SCC, SCC to battery). I'm in Australia so I bought that one, but you must be able to find something similar.