It the SCC showing it's in bulk charge mode?Wired in Parallel running on a victron MPPT 30amp. Using a branch connector, perhaps that may be the issue, I do have an extra set so will give those a shot.
??What are the Vmp and Imp ratings of each panel?
both are 17.7 VMP and 5.7 IMP, though, per renogy's specs, but I can not look at the back of the panels as they are mounted. I will add they were purchased within 4 months of one another.
OK, those would be 100W (17.7 * 5.7) panels, not 160W. That makes more sense if each is giving you 90-100W.17.7 VMP and 5.7 IMP
at the time I started writing it was 10:30 so not best condition, also flat mounted so best I can get is 130 or so in the middle of summer. Was just going to ask about wiring in series.OK, those would be 100W (17.7 * 5.7) panels, not 160W. That makes more sense if each is giving you 90-100W.
Try the panels in series and see what you get. It could be something with your Y-connectors.
Wired in series and jumped to 230. At the same time noticed that my charger had switched to Absorption charging from bulk. could that cause the cap at 130W?OK, those would be 100W (17.7 * 5.7) panels, not 160W. That makes more sense if each is giving you 90-100W.
Try the panels in series and see what you get. It could be something with your Y-connectors.
Went back and checked and got some better numbers on parallel wiring, but still a significant difference to me. 230 W in Series and 200 in Parallel. Is that considered normal?The max power the SCC puts out is in bulk mode. Absorption tapers the current down as the battery becomes fully charged so it's not a good way to measure your panel capacity. The SCC will only put out what the battery will take.
Not 100% sure they are identical, just per the specs from Renogy. both are 160W , just producing lower due to being flat mounted. Was thinking that both parallel and series are limited by either Volts or Amps respectively and assuming any difference should more or less be the same. They are mounted sloping in opposing directions since the roof has a slight arch and they are side by side, that could probably cause a difference as well.Are you 100% positive both of the panels have the same Vmp and Imp? The numbers you previously gave are for a 100W panel.
100W + 100W only means 200W if the panels are 100% the same ratings. If they are different, you may be seeing that in your results.
both are 160W
Those numbers don't add up. 17.7 Volts times 5.7 Amps = 100 Watts, not 160 Watts.17.7 VMP and 5.7 IMP
Yes, indeed.parallel and series are limited by either Volts or Amps respectively
Got it. Yes I pulled the wrong information 20.2 and 7.92 should be it.Those numbers don't add up. 17.7 Volts times 5.7 Amps = 100 Watts, not 160 Watts.
Yes, indeed.