zanydroid
Solar Wizard
America be weird like that.Ah, SolarEdge. Good point. It's OK kit but unnecessary complication IMO.
America be weird like that.Ah, SolarEdge. Good point. It's OK kit but unnecessary complication IMO.
He has a solar edge system with optimizers . Low limit on a string is 8 panels, high side is 20-22 forget the exact number. Those inverters have 2 string inputs that would not be obvious without opening the inverter.I find it hard to believe only one string was installed. If that were the case your inverter would have let out the magic smoke by now.
It has a 480 V DC PV input limit. Not sure the exact model of panel you have but their Voc is likely to be ~ 37 V. 32 x 37 V = 1,184 V.
But frankly, 2 strings doesn't make sense either as that would still exceed the DC input limit.
There are a lot of reasons for DC to AC ratios above 1 to 1 but that is not the issue in this case where the OP was given a specifric set of equipment. Unless the original solar contractor gave him a performance guarantee and said that the equipment was representative of what would generate those numbers. Then a case could be made using PVWatts that the system he got might be close. However with 12.8 kW in panels and 15.2 kW in inverter that is a DC to AC ratio of less than 1 to 1 I think the performance will be somewhat less and the OP loses the andvantage of two inverters on two separate strings which gives him some redundancy. While I generally favor ratios in the area of 1.3 to 1, in this case the OP has a good case to argue for the specific inverter and string combination for which he contracted.Please explain why it is a good practice other than saving a few $$ on a smaller inverter.
That is the big unknown in this case and that needs to be understood if that was the reason for the change. However the original contract was for two 7.6 kW inverters totaling 15.2 kW so if the original contractor made that mistake can he reasonably argue that it was beyond his control. That is a factual issue that needs to be understood before pressing for specific performance by forcing the contractor to replace the 10 kW inverter with two 7.6 kW inverters.Because in many locations there are limits on the grid-tied inverter capacity one is permitted to install. So you make the best use of it by over panelling.
He contracted for 32 panels so two strings 16 each sounds like an optimum configuration. That is another good point if he truly has 32 panels on a single string. That is a fact the OP needs to confirm.Low limit on a string is 8 panels, high side is 20-22
Yes, thanks, that was pointed out to me a little earlier and makes sense now. I should have tweaked earlier when I saw the inverter model.He has a solar edge system with optimizers
Either way, such a change should have involved customer consultation as it may result in a different option being considered/chosen.That is the big unknown in this case and that needs to be understood if that was the reason for the change. However the original contract was for two 7.6 kW inverters totaling 15.2 kW so if the original contractor made that mistake can he reasonably argue that it was beyond his control. That is a factual issue that needs to be understood before pressing for specific performance by forcing the contractor to replace the 10 kW inverter with two 7.6 kW inverters.
No question about that. I presume we are both commenting from the same perspective of English Common Law when it comes to contracts.Either way, such a change should have involved customer consultation as it may result in a different option being considered/chosen.
Contract or not, it's just the right thing to do.No question about that. I presume we are both commenting from the same perspective of English Common Law when it comes to contracts.
I wanted to get your opinion on the 1 string. In the solar edge app this what I see. A single string of panels connected to the inverter. That is the basis of my one string comments. I guess this could be something in the app? Not brave enough to actually crack it open and start counting wires.I find it hard to believe only one string was installed. If that were the case your inverter would have let out the magic smoke by now.
It has a 480 V DC PV input limit. Not sure the exact model of panel you have but their Voc is likely to be ~ 37 V. 32 x 37 V = 1,184 V.
But frankly, 2 strings doesn't make sense either as that would still exceed the DC input limit.
For sure that set up looks weird. Since it's Solaredge I'm going to refrain from comment as I am less familiar with their general string structure.I wanted to get your opinion on the 1 string.
Agree that you need to supervise if not doing it DIY. But are there any solar installers around that have been doing it for 30 years?Yeah, I definitely agree with this. Unless you pay cadillac prices for an installer that's been around for 30 years (which some people I know go for) you have to really supervise the installation.
I hope this all works out OK as it sounds that you have clear documentation as to what you were promised. But am a little puzzled why you paid in full when they turned the system on... wasn't it clear at that point there was only one inverter, rather than two?I paid in full at the time they turned on the system.
There is at least one around me that has been around since the mid 1990s and made it to milestone of installing two systems on the same house after the first one hit 25 years/obsolescence….Agree that you need to supervise if not doing it DIY. But are there any solar installers around that have been doing it for 30 years?