I see the 3048 says it is parallel able and split phase able. I'm still learning, but it appears split phase is kind of like putting things in series. But unlike DC series connections that simply double the voltage, the split phase arrangement also puts the two 120v legs out of phase with each other just like grid power. If anything I think the 3048 would be the way to go. If project goes no further than the basics, I'm covered without adding extra cost. If something is in the cards further down the line, then the system can be expanded for 240v.
One more question...it seems that these particular MPP units' "zero transfer time" work because the inverter is always running to power the load. It's not really a "smart switch" from grid to battery with regards to handling the load. I think the only "switch" it makes is charging the bank from grid to charging the bank from solar. I'm not sure if I like that for a few reasons.
-First, if grid is up then it charges the battery bank and solar sits unused. The only time solar comes into play is when grid is down, so for this application it's so rare that it seems kind of pointless to add those panels. Just get more battery to fill in for the solar and cut down on the complexity of adding panels that basically won't be used. Is this correct? Is this how this thing works?
-Second, wouldn't that constant use wear out an inverter a lot faster than necessary? I'm no electrical wizard, but in my general experience when an electrical component runs 24/7 for 365 days a year vs maybe 2-5 times per year for 6-24 hours per occurrence, it wears out faster. Does that also mean this is constantly cycling the batteries and running the charger? That might diminish the life of the batteries as well. And reduce overall efficiency by converting AC to DC for charging and then back to AC through inverter...there's got to be some loss there.
Can anybody confirm my two dislikes above?
Also, if that is the case then I'm wondering if it really is cause for concern or I'm just being too picky. Do all these AIO units basically work this way, or are there some that have a "smart switch" that somehow runs the basics off grid when it's up but switches to battery/solar/inverter only when the grid is down?
One more question...it seems that these particular MPP units' "zero transfer time" work because the inverter is always running to power the load. It's not really a "smart switch" from grid to battery with regards to handling the load. I think the only "switch" it makes is charging the bank from grid to charging the bank from solar. I'm not sure if I like that for a few reasons.
-First, if grid is up then it charges the battery bank and solar sits unused. The only time solar comes into play is when grid is down, so for this application it's so rare that it seems kind of pointless to add those panels. Just get more battery to fill in for the solar and cut down on the complexity of adding panels that basically won't be used. Is this correct? Is this how this thing works?
-Second, wouldn't that constant use wear out an inverter a lot faster than necessary? I'm no electrical wizard, but in my general experience when an electrical component runs 24/7 for 365 days a year vs maybe 2-5 times per year for 6-24 hours per occurrence, it wears out faster. Does that also mean this is constantly cycling the batteries and running the charger? That might diminish the life of the batteries as well. And reduce overall efficiency by converting AC to DC for charging and then back to AC through inverter...there's got to be some loss there.
Can anybody confirm my two dislikes above?
Also, if that is the case then I'm wondering if it really is cause for concern or I'm just being too picky. Do all these AIO units basically work this way, or are there some that have a "smart switch" that somehow runs the basics off grid when it's up but switches to battery/solar/inverter only when the grid is down?