diy solar

diy solar

Careful if you ordered Apexium DIY Box (melted fuse cover)

The good news is IF the BMS still works, after reconnecting things directly, without washers in between, you have a spare set of terminals, so, with new cables you should be able to get these up and running.
I wanted to add some room for margin. I spoke with Daisy about using a crimped 2/0 wire instead of the pop on connectors that came with the kit. I also don’t have enough female connectors now. She spoke with Docan’s engineer and said it would be okay to remove one of the male connectors then bring the 2/0 wire through the hole to connect to the bus. Would it be better to connect this in between DK-1 or go directly to the bus with the fuse? Thoughts on this approach?IMG_7797.jpeg
IMG_7798.jpeg
image.jpg
IMG_7806.jpeg
IMG_7807.jpeg
IMG_7808.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7805.jpeg
    IMG_7805.jpeg
    109.5 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
Slight difference opinion here, I would move washer C to the bottom below the busbar. Just a little extra space between the fuse and holder. The fuse itself of that type can get pretty warm at high current. Still gets it out of the current path.
Actually, I would place the washer c, under the bussbar directly on the stud above the plastic.
 
After days of rewiring, today is the day I’m going to connect and power on. If you see anything please critique!

IMG_7848.jpegIMG_7825.jpegIMG_7829.jpegIMG_7828.jpegIMG_7812.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7814.jpeg
    IMG_7814.jpeg
    88.8 KB · Views: 5
  • IMG_7813.jpeg
    IMG_7813.jpeg
    70.2 KB · Views: 5
Only thing I see I don't like is still no grommets or glands where the cables pass through the front panel- DC cables can move when heavy loads are applied suddenly, and long term you could end up shorting the cables on the panel as the insulation abrades...
 
View attachment 193489
The real question is how do I salvage this to get working tomorrow? Should I just skirt the 400A fuse and hook it straight to the BMS? Seems kind of pointless to have a 400 amp fuse on a 280Ah battery.


Not sure if mentioned previously, but, this is a copy of an Amphenol Tuchel Radlok connector. I would consider buying the original thing as achieving their rated ampacity relies largely on the quality of their "radsok" crimp sockets which I've personally seen to have mixed quality in knockoff products. Some great, some not so much.
 
Only thing I see I don't like is still no grommets or glands where the cables pass through the front panel- DC cables can move when heavy loads are applied suddenly, and long term you could end up shorting the cables on the panel as the insulation abrades...
I would not use this battery in parallel with the others, as you now have a MUCH higher resistance long positive cable then the rest will.
This battery will see less demand and provide less current than the others leading to frequent out of balance use.
 
One thought - I know most wire has a minimum turn radius when passing signals through it, do DC wires have a similar requirement?
 
One thought - I know most wire has a minimum turn radius when passing signals through it, do DC wires have a similar requirement?
Was thinking along the same lines. I think the busbar is fatigued at the bend. The pictures show it getting hot there.
 
Last edited:
I would replace that fuse surely having all the goop leaking out of it earlier from the very high temps has degraded it?
Pretty sure the goop was the melted cover over the fuse. The residue won't hurt anything since the fuse looks to be ceramic but I'd scrape it off for neatness sake
 
Was thinking along the same lines. I think the busbar is fatigued at the bend. The pictures show it getting hot there.
Might be better to bring the positive wire through the other post hole, or just use the post and connect on the outside then a short cable from the inside post to the fuse.

And the re-assembled picture - the negative cable is red outside the case - no confusion becase of the black heat shrink. But what I see is when the faceplate is laid out the cable comes in at an angle through the hole but once the face is up it has a super tight turn radius as well.


And just as a point of curiosity what is the width and thickness of the busbar?
 
Last edited:
Not sure if mentioned previously, but, this is a copy of an Amphenol Tuchel Radlok connector. I would consider buying the original thing as achieving their rated ampacity relies largely on the quality of their "radsok" crimp sockets which I've personally seen to have mixed quality in knockoff products. Some great, some not so much.
This is a futronics, no copy, but similar idea, and of very good quality
Mainly used in byd busses.

Would agree on completely replacing them, either amphenol (better availability in us/eu) or a new set of futronics
 
I would not use this battery in parallel with the others, as you now have a MUCH higher resistance long positive cable then the rest will.
This battery will see less demand and provide less current than the others leading to frequent out of balance use.
I ended up doing this for all three of the batteries so they are identical. Not sure if that helps the situation?
 
Might be better to bring the positive wire through the other post hole, or just use the post and connect on the outside then a short cable from the inside post to the fuse.

And the re-assembled picture - the negative cable is red outside the case - no confusion becase of the black heat shrink. But what I see is when the faceplate is laid out the cable comes in at an angle through the hole but once the face is up it has a super tight turn radius as well.
Im off grid so I had to make use of the 2/0 cable I had on hand
And just as a point of curiosity what is the width and thickness of the busbar?
I have the 1000A bluesea busbar
IMG_7854.jpeg
 
Back
Top