diy solar

diy solar

Dr Strangetroll : or how I learned to stop arguing and be amused by the intransigence

A total of 105 drugs are known to interact with Tylenol (acetaminophen), categorized as 6 major, 64 moderate, and 35 minor interactions.

A total of 81 drugs are known to interact with ivermectin, categorized as 0 major, 79 moderate, and 2 minor interactions.

Ivermectin is SAFER than Tylenol.
You understand ( of course you don't) that you just totally undermined Bob's argument.

He was saying Paxlovid was bad because it had 27 drug interactions.

But under your standard. Paxlovid would be the safest. Then Ivermectin. Then Tylenol.

In your defense, Bob made the first logical blunder by equating safety and interactions. For example, cyanide could have zero interactions and kill 100% of the people that take it.
 
It looks like government here (Netherlands) is going to end restrictions, those who are not vaccinated are not going to get vaccinated and they are not going to try to persuade them.

Hospitalization is down even as number of infected are up. It is all guesswork on their part, but I can see why they have lost patience with the unvaccinated.

Omnicom seems to be the predominant strain and it looks to be milder. Hard to tell though as there is no accurate data. People are just self isolating and not getting tested. Good news is that they get paid during sickness, always has been the policy here. They even recognize sick of work days...
 
Well here is quite good, and at least for me surprising news, the booster shots are holding on antibody response out to four months now. Also, this is against Omicron so quite impressive.
 

Attachments

  • Omicron 4 month.jpg
    Omicron 4 month.jpg
    92.3 KB · Views: 2
First of all, interactions are not dangerous unless they occur. I just went along with it for Bob's sake.

Second, the number in and of itself is irrelevant.

For instance, if one drug had 200 interactions and they were minor or moderate, that is a vastly different situation than having a drug with only one interaction but was 100% lethal.

Have you looked through the 81 ivermectin interactions to see if there is an interaction with anything you are taking? Of course, you didn't. You don't even know if what you got is actually ivermectin. You want people to take you seriously but you are reckless and irresponsible.
Interesting how someone who claims to have a medical background didn't notice
that ivermectin has ZERO major interactions with any other drugs.
It's one of the safest on the planet !
You must be a paid shill for Pfizer or Moderna, which would explain your "retired lawyer" schtick.
If they pay you more than minimum wage , they are getting ripped off.
 
Interesting how someone who claims to have a medical background didn't notice
that ivermectin has ZERO major interactions with any other drugs.
It's one of the safest on the planet !
You must be a paid shill for Pfizer or Moderna, which would explain your "retired lawyer" schtick.
If they pay you more than minimum wage , they are getting ripped off.
That is the point I was making BMcl. YOU are the one that posted the number of interactions of over,extinct and Tylenol in bold caps like it was really meaningful. You are the one that said ivermectin was safer based on the number of interactions. You said nothing about the potential severity of the interactions. You simply gave the numbers in big bold letters. You are lying and changing your argument within the space of 10 posts. Ivermectin is of course not the safest drug on the planet.That is a ludicrous statement.

Again, you are making the same moronic mistake of equating the potential for interactions with safety of the drug. They are two different things.

And yes Pfizer and Moderna are extremely concerned with the opinion of you and Bob on a solar forum so they are paying me millions to stop you from revealing their conspiracy to the world. They just upped my pay because they think you two are so bright.
 
Last edited:
Interesting how someone who claims to have a medical background didn't notice
that ivermectin has ZERO major interactions with any other drugs.
It's one of the safest on the planet !
You must be a paid shill for Pfizer or Moderna, which would explain your "retired lawyer" schtick.
If they pay you more than minimum wage , they are getting ripped off.
By the way did you look at the definition of moderate interaction. It is not sunshine and roses.
 
Just link to the opinion article of that British medical journal. There is no reason for any normal person to go to a ultra right wing conspiracy site. (Unless you are a conspiracy theorist)
BMJ, a weekly peer-reviewed medical trade journal published by the trade union the British Medical Association, called for the release of the data in an editorial published on Wednesday.

Johnson just makes things up, like calling the British Medical Journal a ultra right-wing conspiracy site, simply because he wants to ignore that Pfizer has not revealed the data that was used to approve the vaccine.

What is Big Pharma hiding ? Lots of side effects ?

Johnson, cdkipp and the rest berate people for questioning the obvious.
Because they are now embarrassed how snookered they were, trusting in Big Pharma.
 
This is a risk analysis chart for someone already infected.

Going into the red zone on any of the four items makes you very high risk and would prioritize you for monoclonal antibodies, remdesivir, and paxlovid.

Many things to take from this chart. One is the critical importance of vaccination as it relates to risk. Second, is that only one of these is controllable (vaccination).

One consequence of this type of risk analysis is that unvaccinated people get priority to these treatments even though they have assumed the risk. This is why you hear people say if they did not get vaccinated (those that can) then they should just die at home. The priority of the unvccinated is especially hard to swallow when you know, as Batvette above and the other kooks in other places, many have diminished the lives of the disabled, chronically ill, and elderly by saying their deaths don't count.
Youre lying as usual. C/P where i said that.
 
BMJ, a weekly peer-reviewed medical trade journal published by the trade union the British Medical Association, called for the release of the data in an editorial published on Wednesday.

Johnson just makes things up, like calling the British Medical Journal a ultra right-wing conspiracy site, simply because he wants to ignore that Pfizer has not revealed the data that was used to approve the vaccine.

What is Big Pharma hiding ? Lots of side effects ?

Johnson, cdkipp and the rest berate people for questioning the obvious.
Because they are now embarrassed how snookered they were, trusting in Big Pharma.
1. There was nothing peer-reviewed about what you cited, and we told you this, this was an opinion piece by one of many editors. I know of the guy but thought you would just stop lying. He is a known associate of RFK jr and has been doing increasingly weird stuff.

2. This is a lie and you know it is a lie. Johnson, who I have never found to be dishonest in any way, correctly noted that what you posted a known disinformation source LifeSiteNews. If you wanted us to read the BMJ you would have linked to the BMJ. You wanted us to read Lifesitesnews take on the opinion. You don't read medical journals. You cant understand them. You posted lifesitenews.

3. Big Pharma has released the necessary information to the FDA, CDC, NIH and every corresponding agency in other western democracies that utilize the drug. They have the expertise to review the data. NONE of them said the data was insufficient. Do you think safety data showed up in the few thousand people in the trial that did not show up in the hundreds of millions of shots given in the real world since? Does that make any sense? There is post-approval data kept all over. vaccinations are still going on. Have Doshi run his own trial. He doesn't want the information he is purposefully throwing shit at Pfizer requesting information they are not going to give. It is an anti-vax scam. Doshi also attacked other vaccinations in the past. THINK

'I asked BCml and BOB B for their taxes and personal correspondence for the last five years. They said NO. THEY REFUSE!!!! What are they hiding?????? OMG such criminals. If they were honest they would just send it to me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
 
Youre lying as usual. C/P where i said that.
You above were demanding to know the number of children that died. Correct?

So if it were 1,000 you would say that is nothing. Correct? I already posted the hospitalizations numbers. Apparently, those are no big deal to you or those alone would have sufficed to convey to you how serious the situation is. Correct? You also constantly refer to underlying conditions and comorbidities as though that makes the death and hospitalizations okay--somehow those deaths and that suffering matter less.

Maybe you can drive their corpses around in your Batman car to show everyone how special you are!
 
BMJ, a weekly peer-reviewed medical trade journal published by the trade union the British Medical Association, called for the release of the data in an editorial published on Wednesday.

Johnson just makes things up, like calling the British Medical Journal a ultra right-wing conspiracy site, simply because he wants to ignore that Pfizer has not revealed the data that was used to approve the vaccine.

What is Big Pharma hiding ? Lots of side effects ?

Johnson, cdkipp and the rest berate people for questioning the obvious.
Because they are now embarrassed how snookered they were, trusting in Big Pharma.
This is what Johnson said " Just link to the opinion article of that British medical journal. There is no reason for any normal person to go to a ultra right wing conspiracy site. (Unless you are a conspiracy theorist)"

He literally said the exact opposite of what you claim. You posted the above quote and then called him a liar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Another big problem with Covid in kids is Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C).

A new study out of France shows that the vaccine is extremely effective in reducing the number of MIS-C.
 

Attachments

  • france misc.jpg
    france misc.jpg
    224.6 KB · Views: 0
You above were demanding to know the number of children that died. Correct?

So if it were 1,000 you would say that is nothing. Correct? I already posted the hospitalizations numbers. Apparently, those are no big deal to you or those alone would have sufficed to convey to you how serious the situation is. Correct? You also constantly refer to underlying conditions and comorbidities as though that makes the death and hospitalizations okay--somehow those deaths and that suffering matter less.

Maybe you can drive their corpses around in your Batman car to show everyone how special you are!
If I had really said what you claimed you wouldnt need that long convoluted post dodging the issue. You lied.
 
More Biden crime family hijinx!

the Biden family, while he was vice president of the United States and continuing when he became president, received some $31 million from Chinese individuals who are linked to the highest levels of Chinese intelligence,"


ADAC
Why don't you start your own thread about your other conspiracy theories?
 
Interesting how someone who claims to have a medical background didn't notice
that ivermectin has ZERO major interactions with any other drugs.
It's one of the safest on the planet !
You must be a paid shill for Pfizer or Moderna, which would explain your "retired lawyer" schtick.
If they pay you more than minimum wage , they are getting ripped off.
Not to mention that Paxlovid can cause liver damage ... all on it's own. If he had actually looked at the data I snipped and the document I had posted he would know that .... Oh, I forgot .... what he knows to be true has nothing to do what he posts.

He intentions are nothing more than disruption and childish insults .... muddy things up as much as possible.
 
Last edited:
BMJ, a weekly peer-reviewed medical trade journal published by the trade union the British Medical Association, called for the release of the data in an editorial published on Wednesday.

Johnson just makes things up, like calling the British Medical Journal a ultra right-wing conspiracy site, simply because he wants to ignore that Pfizer has not revealed the data that was used to approve the vaccine.

What is Big Pharma hiding ? Lots of side effects ?

Johnson, cdkipp and the rest berate people for questioning the obvious.
Because they are now embarrassed how snookered they were, trusting in Big Pharma.
Have you noticed he doesn't want to talk about Honduras .... I have posted data and links to lot of data about how Honduras turned the pandemic around there ... He has ZERO interest in seeing the truth or actually knowing what works and doesn't works ... he is just wants to obscure the truth.
 
Have you noticed he doesn't want to talk about Honduras .... I have posted data and links to lot of data about how Honduras turned the pandemic around there ... He has ZERO interest in seeing the truth or actually knowing what works and doesn't works ... he is just wants to obscure the truth.
I will talk about Honduras if you will read it. You said you weren't reading my posts anymore so I didn't see the point. I told you I had reviewed Honduras data. It won't be a short post though as it requires thought.
 
I will talk about Honduras if you will read it. You said you weren't reading my posts anymore so I didn't see the point. I told you I had reviewed Honduras data. It won't be a short post though as it requires thought.
I can interpret the Honduras data on my own just fine ..... I'm really not interested to see how you are going to try to twist into into something it's not.
Just an admission that they developed VERY effective treatment protocols would be fine ... but unlikely to happen.
 
BMJ, a weekly peer-reviewed medical trade journal published by the trade union the British Medical Association, called for the release of the data in an editorial published on Wednesday.

Johnson just makes things up, like calling the British Medical Journal a ultra right-wing conspiracy site, simply because he wants to ignore that Pfizer has not revealed the data that was used to approve the vaccine.

What is Big Pharma hiding ? Lots of side effects ?

Johnson, cdkipp and the rest berate people for questioning the obvious.
Because they are now embarrassed how snookered they were, trusting in Big Pharma.
And there is another lie, you are making it too easy. I asked you to link to the article itself, not the ultra right wing site that promotes conspiracy theories.
 

diy solar

diy solar
Back
Top