I've read this new specification sheet for the EVE LF280K battery cell several times, at varying levels of sleep deprivation and alcohol consumption, and I'm just not convinced we are understanding it entirely. (please note that there is a difference in important details on the spec sheets for different battery cells. Don't apply the wrong sheet to the wrong cell.)
First, I don't want to confuse the test conditions for determining cell failure under abuse with instructions on how to use the battery. For instance, section 3 of the document is dedicated to test conditions. There are parts of this section that tell you to discharge the battery to 0v (section 3.8.4.2) or heat it to 300°C (3.8.4.8 step 4). These are not operating instructions, these are testing conditions for various failure modes. Yet, in this same section, people are seeing the Fixture design in section 3.3 and assuming it is the recommended fixture for normal use. However, if you read the text, it is called a "Test Fixture" designed for use with a "single cell" not a battery pack.
It is section 4 of the document that outline the limits for normal use of the cell in a battery, and in section 5 we can find the absolute limits where the BMS must shut down the use of the battery completely.
So, it is not until section 6 that they begin talking about the recommendations for battery module design. (note that the first section 6.1, about "Battery Directions" is blank. The term "battery directions" is referring to the definition of the x, y, and z axis, and the diagram that goes in this section is at the top of the same page. It appears to have gotten mis-located when they laid out the document.)
So then I asked myself what I can understand with certainty from Section 6 of the EVE LF280K-
- From the table at the top of page 27. If at any point in the charge cycle, your battery cell holder applies more than 50kN or 11240 lbs of force (or 240 psi) to the broad face of the cell, you will cause internal damage.
- Confusingly, in section 6.3 there is another test, but I think this is a test of your battery module holder. The holder is supposed to be setup to apply the same 300kgf at 30-40% state of charge as the test holder does. At the beginning of life (BOL), after cycling the cell fully and then returning it to a 60% state of charge, your module holder should not be applying more than 3kN or 674 lbs of force to the battery pack.
- Section 6.4 just tells us that the battery conducts heat 10 times better to the ends of the cell as it does to the broad face of the cell. This makes sense because the metal foils will carry heat to the ends of the cell whereas the heat going to the broad face of the cell has to cross layers inside the battery.
- Section 6.5 tells us to monitor the center of the broad face of the cells within the module and to monitor the cell terminal temperature.
Those are the only things I can say for certain.
Also, just to say it again, the specs for the 304ah battery are much different. This is especially true for the pressure applied to the cell. Those cells will get damaged at only 9kN, which is 2032 lbs of force on the broad face, or 36.7psi. I'm sticking with my compressive foam design on module holders for these cells.