I think no you need a lot of windThe biggest fallacy I see with hobby wind turbines is that the generator is one-to-one with the blades. It would work better to overdrive the generator but then, that takes more HP I.E. bigger blades. ( I might just play with that...)
I've long pondered that the ideal wind turbine for ~98% of residential sites would make its peak power at ~16 mph or less. The reasoning is that most sites spend ~98% of their time at wind speeds less than 16mph so why design a turbine for less than 2% of the year?The biggest fallacy I see with hobby wind turbines is that the generator is one-to-one with the blades. It would work better to overdrive the generator but then, that takes more HP I.E. bigger blades. ( I might just play with that...)
Are there any small turbine manufacturers that offer a "constant speed" blade assembly? I would think if one were pitched for low wind and speed governed to stay below a selected voltage it would be ideal. Not ultra simple, but not complex either.I have a theory that states for wind to be of any value it must be so cheap your rig can sit idle a lot more than solar systems
Ultra cheap so if they break your ongoing to be upset
Ultra simple to build some you can run several turbines at once ( if you have space )
Ultra safe they must have brakes as well as furling incase something goes wrong
The first attempts at constant-speed propellers were called counterweight propellers, which were driven by mechanisms that operated on centrifugal force. Their operation is identical to the centrifugal governor used by James Watt to control the speed of steam engines. Eccentric weights were set up near or in the spinner, held in by a spring. When the propeller reached a certain RPM, centrifugal force would cause the weights to swing outwards, which would drive a mechanism that twisted the propeller into a steeper pitch. When the propeller slowed, the RPM would decrease enough for the spring to push the weights back in, realigning the propeller to the shallower pitch.
You might get a kick out of studying the wind chargers from the early rural electrification days in the 30's. They had a variety of mechanical overspeed protection systems.Are there any small turbine manufacturers that offer a "constant speed" blade assembly? I would think if one were pitched for low wind and speed governed to stay below a selected voltage it would be ideal. Not ultra simple, but not complex either.
That's pretty much it. One more thing I would try to add to your list:I have a theory that states for wind to be of any value it must be so cheap your rig can sit idle a lot more than solar systems
Ultra cheap so if they break your ongoing to be upset
Ultra simple to build some you can run several turbines at once ( if you have space )
Ultra safe they must have brakes as well as furling incase something goes wrong
Wow that would be neat to see. Those are massive machines. How is he charging the batteries?My brother bought one these used, 17.5Kw. https://www.jacobswind.net/
60 foot tower, he has it on a hinges on 2 legs and lowers it using a winch, takes about 2 hours to lower the tower down. He has it grid tie and locks it down once his bank is built up. He originally was paid $0.10Kwh. Pretty good unit, still requires maintenance.
They forced him onto net metering when there was merger between the local REC and another utility. He just runs his net meter bank up to the limit, then locks the rotor so it isn't wearing the power head out. He doesn't require a dump load as he net meters. He told me it will output up to 22Kw.Wow that would be neat to see. Those are massive machines. How is he charging the batteries?
About 10 years ago I helped a guy rebuild and reinstall a few of the grid tie models on an existing site so they were grandfathered in. I think the problem with trying to do anything with them today would be getting the utility to approve them for installation at a new site since thier 40+ year old inverters would not meet today's UL1741 or IEE1541.