Im not a brand fan but I would think for the average user the emporia would be the better choice at $165 vs $314 for the iotawatt.Iotawatt with one 50 amp sensor per heat pump will tell you all you need. It'll save the data to the internal sd card and store up to 15 years worth of data.
One word of caution about Vue or any product with cloud service for that matter, it is only a matter of time before the company (emporia) decides to move more and more features behind a firewall (other chinese manufacturers would just disconnect their cloud service making your investment a paperweight) - Remember philips vue and many other productsSimple inexpensive energy monitor Emporia Vue 2 has seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks and month data logging of Watts and Amps. You will need this data to determine the battery capacity needed to run overnight.
Start up surge on the compressor can be cut by up to 70% with a soft starter. Mico-Air or HyperEngineering are two brands I know of.
Iotawatt can do 12 circuits besides mains or 14 total , but he doesn't need to buy 14 sensors. He only needs one for each heat pump so he would save money.Im using 6 255 watt panels and a
Im not a brand fan but I would think for the average user the emporia would be the better choice at $165 vs $314 for the iotawatt.
Both basically serve the same purpose from what I can tell. The iotawatt is better if offline is a must and or having the data local only.
But just from a measuring standpoint the emporia is about 1/2 the price and can measure 16 circuits besides the mains where the iotawatt just does 10 circuits besides the mains though the unit shows 14 plugs on the box but claims 10 sensors come with it looking at the website.
Installation is actually the same hardware wise. The two units look identical to me (I actually figured they were clones of each other at first glance) and the software is simpler on the emporia. As for seeing total use minus the monitored ones thats what the balance field shows if Im understanding what you mean.Iotawatt can do 12 circuits besides mains or 14 total , but he doesn't need to buy 14 sensors. He only needs one for each heat pump so he would save money.
I monitor a system where there isn't internet yet so the iotawatt made more sense and is also simpler to install. I believe the built in graphing also shows more data than the emporia.
For example, does emporia have a way to add math channels? Eg if you want to show total use minus monitored circuits?
Are you trying to charge a Tesla with a 15kWh battery pack or are you trying to put 15kWhs into your Tesla? The cost difference would be significant.I want to build something similar to Level 2 charge a Tesla. I really doubt that what I’m asking for is cheap. For me the requirement would be a 6 kw load for two hours a day. The battery pack would be 15 kWh.
The 15 kWh battery pack would be needed since most of my charging will be done after panels would stop producing. Work requires me to be away from the house during the day.Are you trying to charge a Tesla with a 15kWh battery pack or are you trying to put 15kWhs into your Tesla? The cost difference would be significant.
How are the analytics? Can you see min max average for a time frame? For example the last 30 mins?Installation is actually the same hardware wise. The two units look identical to me (I actually figured they were clones of each other at first glance) and the software is simpler on the emporia. As for seeing total use minus the monitored ones thats what the balance field shows if Im understanding what you mean.
Iota Watt does, but you already know that.How are the analytics? Can you see min max average for a time frame? For example the last 30 mins?
I know the iotawatt does. I have one. I'm asking if you can do that with emporia vue- I don't think soIota Watt does, but you already know that.
I have an Emporia and the analystics are good. I can see data in graph form that allows me to see min and max. I don't recall if average is actually calculated over a thirty minute period but it can be inferred from the graph. Raw data can be exported and you can run any averages if you put it in a spreadsheet.I'm asking if you can do that with emporia vue- I don't think so
Iotawatt shows it with actual numbers for any time period you want, which I like. It can also export to csv.I have an Emporia and the analystics are good. I can see data in graph form that allows me to see min and max. I don't recall if average is actually calculated over a thirty minute period but it can be inferred from the graph. Raw data can be exported and you can run any averages if you put it in a spreadsheet.
I don't think the Emporia stores any data for any length of time. It is all based on the cloud.How much data does Vue store? Does it store data even if not connected to internet?
I thought so but wasn't sure. That was a another factor for me. The iotawatt will store up to 15 years worth of data that I can recall at any time, without the InternetI don't think the Emporia stores any data for any length of time. It is all based on the cloud.
Its cloud based which is why in the earlier post I did on this I saidI thought so but wasn't sure. That was a another factor for me. The iotawatt will store up to 15 years worth of data that I can recall at any time, without the Internet
One thing the iotawatt shows which I appreciate is the power factor of a load. Does the Vue perchance show this?Its cloud based which is why in the earlier post I did on this I said
"Im not a brand fan but I would think for the average user the emporia would be the better choice at $165 vs $314 for the iotawatt.
Both basically serve the same purpose from what I can tell. The iotawatt is better if offline is a must and or having the data local only."
The emporia will show you how much a circuit is using, has used, etc over a given period of time you select.
So again if you have internet and just want to know how much something is using power wise including load spikes (which the op asked for) and have internet for it to work with $165 beats $314.
If you want to go all offline and not have it sending data then the iotawatt is a good buy.
I have multiple homes and shops and being able to find what my stuff is doing with my phone or a pc from anywhere in the world is pretty handy to me which is why I like the cloud based method.
I originally wanted nothing to do with the cloud method but after having it vs the local method which is what the first unit I had did I prefer the cloud method now and Im pretty anti-cloud/net server for most stuff.
But as I said either will do what the op wants I just think the iotawatts price is overkill for what he said he wanted to do.
From the data tables? No.One thing the iotawatt shows which I appreciate is the power factor of a load. Does the Vue perchance show this?
Panels and inverters are relatively inexpensive. Batteries per kWh are not. You'll spend a a large sum of money attempting to store enough power to operate an HVAC unit all night.Yes, but if you add the cost of an emergency generator to the equation it might make sense. I could DIY a whole house generator for aout $2K plus some propane work and It would sit there and rust between hurricanes. So if i spend $10K to make the HVAC stand alone it solves the blackout problem and pays for itself eventually.
Lot's of good stuff in the other comments.
Yes, the Heat pump is not the biggest draw over time but it is the biggest single load. Looking at my power bills the difference between August and October is about 25% - October in NC is usually a free month. Heat and AC don't come on at all. But then we travel a lot in the summer so the AC is often left at a temperature that will not kill the cat. And then we have the pool pump running almost constantly (i apparently suck at pool maintenance)