Not to be snarky (ok, mildly snarky but maybe thought provoking):Put another way, if i wanted to use no more than 50% of my battery, which of the three above value sets would provide the greatest cycle life? Which would be worst?
lowerIn conservatively cycling lifepo4 batteries, would cycle life be higher, same or lower if you cycled between 100% and 50% SOC, as opposed to 75% and 25% SOC?
90-30% would give you 60% use. & be gentle on cycle life, worst 60-10ok, so you're saying 100-50 would have a lower cycle life than 75-25 because charging to 100 accelerates degradation.
Say i can detect SOC exactly despite the flat curve. In that case, 90-40 versus 75-25 versus 60-10. Would there be any cycle life improvement by using the center most median value, rather than the higher or lower median?
Put another way, if i wanted to use no more than 50% of my battery, which of the three above value sets would provide the greatest cycle life? Which would be worst?
I see where you're going BUT some of that is leftover "Lead-ism" With Lithium Based batteries 50%-75%-85% makes little to no difference. It's the top & bottom 10% that crosses the threshold. With Lead if you go below 50% DOD you are causing harm and that is part of "battery vernacular" because we have known this for 100+ years since FLA came to being.So then...
for greatest lifespan (number of cycles) 95-5% SOC. Running at 50% use isn't any better. If I ran it at 50% SOC as the median, I get the better lifespan versus running it at 90-40% SOC. Leaving an unused lithium bank at full charge is bad so no having two strings with one in service and the second in full standby.