ericfx1984
Solar Enthusiast
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2021
- Messages
- 741
So have purchased the MPP LVX6048 and a stack of 16 grade A Eve Cells, 304ah with 200a BMS... This will be an off grid system
In addition I have also purchased an EPEver 6415a 60a SCC
Now the manual on the lvx6048 seems to suggest that it can handle 6,000 watts of solar panels... Add up to 450 volts
But when I do the math with only a hundred amp SCC charge controller it ends up closer to about 5,000 Watts (48v x 100a = 4800w). So how do they get off calling it a 6000 SCC?
The EPEver should do right about 2,900 Watts. Maryland I'm adding this so I can have some sense of redundancy and the ability to have just a little more charging capability
So here is where my dilemma comes in.. ideally, shipped to my door I'd like to have at least 6,000 Watts worth of panels closer to 8,000 if possible
I live in rural Kansas right on the Kansas Missouri border about a third of the way down from the top of the state.. maybe an hour south of Kansas City
Now I have considered going with split cell bi-facials. Certainly during the winter, with snow on the ground, especially on a raised groundmount system, these would outperform anything that I could get affordably.. of course Santan solar has some brand new ones 390w from Canadian Solar for only $180 a panel, they do not come with manufacturer's warranty (just over $0.46 per watt)
They also have some used Canadian solar 405 w split cell bi-facials for $158 per panel (Right at $0.39 per watt)
While these are expensive for my budget.. they still bring a lot of benefit in the winter... But all that being said I'm not going to install a white banner underneath them to bounce son back at them.. meaning the only time that I'll really see the benefit of the bipacials is probably 5 to 30 days a year and there's snow on the ground
So I'm not sure if there is actual benefit to buy facials for me I know that the split cell part of it would make everything more resistant to shading even on cloudy days which I suppose the bifacial part would help as well
But truth be told the only time that I'm going to even come close to using the maximum amount of solar power that I can produce is going to be during the summer when I'm running air conditioning so I'm not so sure that it even really matters as my usage is relatively low in the winter
Which brings me to the used 250w and the used 310w... Both of these come in right at $0.25 a watt or so... That's a whole lot more peak power but I don't know that it necessarily translates into more power produced... I know that those are poly crystalline panels and I know that some folks have suggested that the polycrystalline panels tend to tolerate heat a little better than their monocrystalline brethren... Let me certainly do see some heat during the Summers
I think since neither one of these panels has more than a one year warranty that at least takes warranty out of the equation
I suppose one argument for the 250 watt panels that it would be simple to get replacements for them... Santan solar is likely to have these for some time
In addition I have also purchased an EPEver 6415a 60a SCC
Now the manual on the lvx6048 seems to suggest that it can handle 6,000 watts of solar panels... Add up to 450 volts
But when I do the math with only a hundred amp SCC charge controller it ends up closer to about 5,000 Watts (48v x 100a = 4800w). So how do they get off calling it a 6000 SCC?
The EPEver should do right about 2,900 Watts. Maryland I'm adding this so I can have some sense of redundancy and the ability to have just a little more charging capability
So here is where my dilemma comes in.. ideally, shipped to my door I'd like to have at least 6,000 Watts worth of panels closer to 8,000 if possible
I live in rural Kansas right on the Kansas Missouri border about a third of the way down from the top of the state.. maybe an hour south of Kansas City
Now I have considered going with split cell bi-facials. Certainly during the winter, with snow on the ground, especially on a raised groundmount system, these would outperform anything that I could get affordably.. of course Santan solar has some brand new ones 390w from Canadian Solar for only $180 a panel, they do not come with manufacturer's warranty (just over $0.46 per watt)
They also have some used Canadian solar 405 w split cell bi-facials for $158 per panel (Right at $0.39 per watt)
While these are expensive for my budget.. they still bring a lot of benefit in the winter... But all that being said I'm not going to install a white banner underneath them to bounce son back at them.. meaning the only time that I'll really see the benefit of the bipacials is probably 5 to 30 days a year and there's snow on the ground
So I'm not sure if there is actual benefit to buy facials for me I know that the split cell part of it would make everything more resistant to shading even on cloudy days which I suppose the bifacial part would help as well
But truth be told the only time that I'm going to even come close to using the maximum amount of solar power that I can produce is going to be during the summer when I'm running air conditioning so I'm not so sure that it even really matters as my usage is relatively low in the winter
Which brings me to the used 250w and the used 310w... Both of these come in right at $0.25 a watt or so... That's a whole lot more peak power but I don't know that it necessarily translates into more power produced... I know that those are poly crystalline panels and I know that some folks have suggested that the polycrystalline panels tend to tolerate heat a little better than their monocrystalline brethren... Let me certainly do see some heat during the Summers
I think since neither one of these panels has more than a one year warranty that at least takes warranty out of the equation
I suppose one argument for the 250 watt panels that it would be simple to get replacements for them... Santan solar is likely to have these for some time