No idea, was wondering the same.Just checked them out thanks to you
Looks nice but I am confused by the Charge/ Discharge numbers. Instead of 1C/1C its a says .5P/.5P What is a "P"???
YES, I saw that last week. Seems to me just a doubled up/ side to side 280k. Interesting, but what about 16 of those? How can you move that? Is any company like Seplos/ EEl going to make a box for a 500Lb battery?? Ha, it seems kinda excessive.They also have a massive 560Ahr one, lf560f
Yes, there really is, lithium battery manufacturers, have been continually improving the production techniques and tweaking the structure of the chemistry to increase the quality and charge and discharge, along with lifespan.I want to buy the EVE 306 Ah MB30 cells, is there a real advantage to compare the LF280k cell
Ooh I saw this when Andy got these in his off-grid garage. P is power. So the 314Ah cell at 3.2V is 1005 Watts at 1C. .5P is 500W. Not sure why they changed this or how helpful it is.Just checked them out thanks to you
Looks nice but I am confused by the Charge/ Discharge numbers. Instead of 1C/1C its a says .5P/.5P What is a "P"???
18650 has them for preorder for $110 plus shipping, 304s are $105.MB31 314Ah cells showed up on Nkon.nl today on preorder for delivery end of June. €92 each plus shipping which is €8 more than I recently paid the same vendor for LF304K cells.
![]()
Eve MB31 Prismatic 314Ah - LiFePO4 - 3.2V grade A
Capacity: 314 Ah Maximum Discharge Value: 0.5P (+-157A) Size: L 173.7 x W 71.7 x H 207.2mm This is a 3.2V Lifepo4 cell. The cells have a lifespan (up to 70% capacity) of 8000 cycles.Advised compression force: 3000-7000N With flexible bus bars Capacity report availableeu.nkon.nl
That listing seems dubious:Andy only tested one cell from each batch of MB30/31s and the 30 had the higher capacity.
https://www.alibaba.com/product-det...j8oj9l&bm=cps&src=saf&productId=1601075636787
$100.50 per cell with shipping.
As someone mentioned they are now listing cycles to 70% degradation versus previous 80% levelI’m thinking that these miraculous cell cycle numbers are about as optimistic as lumen ratings for flashlights on Amazon.
And reducing the C rate.As someone mentioned they are now listing cycles to 70% degradation versus previous 80% level
18650 has them for preorder for $110 plus shipping, 304s are $105.
![]()
EVE MB31 Grade A Cells - 3.2V LiFePO4 314Ah Battery
Brand new Grade A EVE MB31 LiFePO4 cells with 314Ah capacity. 10+ years design life, 8,000 cycles. Get unmatched power and performance for your energy storage needs.www.18650batterystore.com
It’s not often we in Europe get better pricing than the US. Those guys at 18650 seem to be making the most of end users not having fully caught up with how much the producer prices have dropped, and must have jacked up their margins compared to last year.
Oh how I love being utterly irresponsible and getting my order from 18650 in just 3 days.. it scratches my itch.I think most will pay the extra price to have someone state side that they can deal with for warranty issues.
The change is to highlight the fact that the voltage changes over the course of discharge so constant amps doesn't equal the same amount of watts over the course of a full discharge. They're saying you can continually pull 507W from a MB31 cell for the full 3.65V to 2.5V and expect to get the charge cycles advertised (along with compression and temp of course), even though the amps would be lower (138.9A) than .5C at the beginning (3.65V) and end higher (202.8A) than .5C at the end (2.5V). This makes sense as most loads, like an inverter, isn't consuming constant amps as voltage changes over discharge. The spec sheet for for MB3(0,1) is way more specific on performance characteristics relating to maximizing lifecycle performance. I love that it has clear expectation on full voltage charge/discharge to get rid of the diy folkwisdom of not charging to the full 3.65 or discharging to 2.5 to extend cell life. It's obvious that with the added unadvertised capacity, when new, that EVE expects full charge discharge to still result in the full advertised cycle count.Ooh I saw this when Andy got these in his off-grid garage. P is power. So the 314Ah cell at 3.2V is 1005 Watts at 1C. .5P is 500W. Not sure why they changed this or how helpful it is.![]()
So would you say the mb30 is better for solar?The change is to highlight the fact that the voltage changes over the course of discharge so constant amps doesn't equal the same amount of watts over the course of a full discharge. They're saying you can continually pull 507W from a MB31 cell for the full 3.65V to 2.5V and expect to get the charge cycles advertised (along with compression and temp of course), even though the amps would be lower (138.9A) than .5C at the beginning (3.65V) and end higher (202.8A) than .5C at the end (2.5V). This makes sense as most loads, like an inverter, isn't consuming constant amps as voltage changes over discharge. The spec sheet for for MB3(0,1) is way more specific on performance characteristics relating to maximizing lifecycle performance. I love that it has clear expectation on full voltage charge/discharge to get rid of the diy folkwisdom of not charging to the full 3.65 or discharging to 2.5 to extend cell life. It's obvious that with the added unadvertised capacity, when new, that EVE expects full charge discharge to still result in the full advertised cycle count.