What about a supercap connected to a bank of AGM's? Does the number of AGM's connected in parallel to form the bank make any type of difference? For example, Im thinking that replenishing a suddenly depleted supercap is going to be more taxing for a single 100ah AGM battery than for four 100ah AGM batteries connected in parallel because the total current required to charge the supercap will come from four batteries instead of just one. This sounds logical to me but Im not an electrician so I fear that I may have missed some important concept.In practice with a supercap in parallel with LiFePO4 there is no need for a current limiter. You can set up the system so that the charge controller charges the supercap before the battery contactor is closed.
During rapid load application the majority of the current comes from the supercap as the voltage drops. Because the voltage of the LiFePO4 and supercap are still the same they both recharge at the current limit of the charger - there is no current from supercap to battery after initial connection
Thanks. I wondered about the "backwards into the battery" thing. It never made much sense to me since internal resistances of battery vs capacitor pretty much dictate a one way possible flow. And a capacitor cant have more voltage than the battery its connected to. But like you said, a lot of folk seem to insinuate that such "backflow" is a risk.There is no capacitor recharge from the battery bank. Under load surge condition the voltage of the battery and capacitor drop together, but much more current comes from the capacitor. When the load is removed the two are still at the same voltage - no current flow. The recharge comes from the charger.
For some reason most people think the supercap discharges into the battery but that is not the case.
So .... if there is no charger in the circuit ... or there is a solar charger and it's dark ... and load is reduced or completely removed .... the battery and capacitor voltage levels come back up .... what recharged the capacitor?There is no capacitor recharge from the battery bank. Under load surge condition the voltage of the battery and capacitor drop together, but much more current comes from the capacitor. When the load is removed the two are still at the same voltage - no current flow. The recharge comes from the charger.
For some reason most people think the supercap discharges into the battery but that is not the case.
My understanding is, in the scenario that you suggested, that even as current is being pulled from the capacitor, the capacitor is pulling from the battery bank as the capacitor attempts to maintain equilibrium with the battery bank. I think the only time there might be an issue is if you connect an "empty" capacitor to a battery bank. The capacitor will attempt to equalize with the battery bank VERY quickly. Maybe too quickly depending upon the battery bank youre connecting the capacitor to. Thats why I was asking if connecting a Supercap to a single 100ah battery or four 100ah batteries connected in parallel makes a difference. I suppose the best option is to always pre-charge a supercap before connecting it to a battery bank.So .... if there is no charger in the circuit ... or there is a solar charger and it's dark ... and load is reduced or completely removed .... the battery and capacitor voltage levels come back up .... what recharged the capacitor?
In my opinion .... You got all that right.My understanding is, in the scenario that you suggested, that even as current is being pulled from the capacitor, the capacitor is pulling from the battery bank as the capacitor attempts to maintain equilibrium with the battery bank. I think the only time there might be an issue is if you connect an "empty" capacitor to a battery bank. The capacitor will attempt to equalize with the battery bank VERY quickly. Maybe too quickly depending upon the battery bank youre connecting the capacitor to. Thats why I was asking if connecting a Supercap to a single 100ah battery or four 100ah batteries connected in parallel makes a difference. I suppose the best option is to always pre-charge a supercap before connecting it to a battery bank.
The first time I connected my Supercap to my AGM battery bank, I had pre-charged it a couple of days before and it was down to 8v. My 900ah AGM battery bank, made up of seven AGM batteries in parallel was at 13v. I had also installed a high amp, DC on/off switch(canablized from an old jumper pack) on the negative cable of my capacitor bank. Keeping this switch off during connection prevented sparking issues. Once I connected the Supercap to my AGM battery bank, I monitored the voltage of my battery bank and turned the capacitor switch on. I saw a VERY slight drop in voltage from my AGM battery bank despite the Supercap being nearly depleted upon connection. I suspect this is because the supercap was equalizing from a 900ah AGM battery bank and not a single 100ah AGM battery. Had I connected a near empty super capacitor to a single 100ah AGM battery, I suspect that I would have seen the voltage of that battery drop quickly and significantly the instant that I connected the capacitor to it.
Im no expert. Not even close! Im just now learning enough about this stuff to be dangerous so take that into consideration as you read on. I believe a lot of how capacitors and batteries interact with each other is based much on the comparative internal resistances of each. Like water, current will flow most readily into areas where there is little resistance to its flow. Capacitors have less internal resistance than batteries so hooking up an "empty" capacitor to a battery will cause current to want to flow from the battery, into the capacitor as quickly as it can get there until the volume of the battery and capacitor equalize. The voltage of a capacitor is entirely dependent upon the voltage of the battery that its connected to. In a set up where a capacitor is constantly connected to a battery bank in parallel, there should never be a time when the capacitor gets "emptied out" since the instant a load is applied to the system, current from the batteries will begin "pouring" into the capacitor trying to keep the capacitor and batteries equalized. I wrote all that to reason it out for myself as much as to try and explain it to others so hopefully it makes at least some sense. And if Ive got anything wrong PLEASE correct me! Its one of the ways I learn.
Anyway, I think thats what toms meant when he said that "there is no capacitor recharge from the battery bank". That once connected and equalized with the battery bank, a super capacitor simply maintains at whatever the battery bank is at. Once connected, a capacitor is never actually depleted, even when the system is under load, so wouldnt need to be "charged". Does that make sense?So .... if there is no charger in the circuit ... or there is a solar charger and it's dark ... and load is reduced or completely removed .... the battery and capacitor voltage levels come back up .... what recharged the capacitor?
Thank you so much for reading that long mess and giving me feedback. I appreciate it very much!In my opinion .... You got all that right
It is not completely depleted ... but charge will be removed from it if a sudden load pulls down the battery voltage. When the load is removed and the battery voltage goes back up, the battery will replace the charge to the capacitor in the scenario I posted.Anyway, I think thats what toms meant when he said that "there is no capacitor recharge from the battery bank". That once connected and equalized with the battery bank, a super capacitor simply maintains at whatever the battery bank is at. Once connected, a capacitor is never actually depleted, even when the system is under load, so wouldnt need to be "charged". Does that make sense?
So technically speaking, the batteries actually do "recharge" a capacitor that they are connected to. Considering that they are separate types of storage devices and one must stay "topped off" using current from the other-AKA re-charging.It is not completely depleted ... but charge will be removed from it if a sudden load pulls down the battery voltage. When the load is removed and the battery voltage goes back up, the battery will replace the charge to the capacitor in the scenario I posted.
I find all of this kind of stuff incredibly interesting. Im having a great time learning about it but feel like Im way behind at my age. I wish Id gotten more into the field of electricity a long time ago.It is not completely depleted ... but charge will be removed from it if a sudden load pulls down the battery voltage. When the load is removed and the battery voltage goes back up, the battery will replace the charge to the capacitor in the scenario I posted.
That would be my opinion.So technically speaking, the batteries actually do "recharge" a capacitor that they are connected to. Considering that they are separate types of storage devices and one must stay "topped off" using current from the other-AKA re-charging.
That’s the thing, there is negligible voltage drop with a supercap in parallel - it doesn’t sag and return like a LiFePO4 by itself.So .... if there is no charger in the circuit ... or there is a solar charger and it's dark ... and load is reduced or completely removed .... the battery and capacitor voltage levels come back up .... what recharged the capacitor?
The main reason i use a supercap in parallel with my LiFePO4 is to allow a relatively small battery to power a large inductive load while still always remaining below 0.5C discharge.One thing about supercaps to realize is that the stored charge is proportional to voltage squared.
In order to remove charge from the supercap to do some useful work, the voltage MUST fall.
Basically there is some finite charge on the supercap at full battery voltage.
Connect a huge sudden load to both, and the voltage across both supercap and battery will fall.
What is sourced by the battery, and what is sourced by the supercap, depends mostly on the internal resistance of the battery, and the value of stored charge on the supercap. The internal resistance of the supercap will be incredibly low and can probably be discounted.
While its true that an infinitely lage supercap will have negligible voltage dip, that would also cost an infinite amount of money.
With practical sized supercaps, the dip will be smaller, maybe much smaller, but it will not go completely away.
What all this means is that if you have a relatively weak (small) battery, there may be very large dips in voltage during high surge loads, and a supercap can help a great deal with for example, the infamous light flicker problem.
If you have a huge lithiuum battery that is large enough to easily supply peak surge loads, with only a very small voltage dip, adding a supercap is going to do very little to improve things. The voltage HAS to dip before the supercap will supply any current at all. The worse the dip, the more a supercap will earn its keep.
Now the situation arises, if you have a significant voltage dip problem, should the money be spent on adding supercaps, or on upgrading the battery by adding extra cells?
Its not always a clear cut decision.
Both batteries and supercaps are expensive, so its well worth thinking the whole thing right through.
But a supercap will only help paper over the voltage dip problem and give no worthwhile increase in total stored battery amp hours.
A significantly larger battery is going store many extra amp hours, and at mid winter for example, that might be money much better spent than on supercaps, especially if the bigger battery also cures the voltage dip problem.
Personally I would rather spend the money on a larger and better battery, than on supercaps.
But I am sure others will disagree strongly with that.
Thank you for taking the time to write all of that out. Parts of it helped me make a "little" more sense out of what Ive seen others say in another thread related to supercaps. It also gives me at least one other direction to take in my Supercap research.One thing about supercaps to realize is that the stored charge is proportional to voltage squared.
In order to remove charge from the supercap to do some useful work, the voltage MUST fall.
Basically there is some finite charge on the supercap at full battery voltage.
Connect a huge sudden load to both, and the voltage across both supercap and battery will fall.
What is sourced by the battery, and what is sourced by the supercap, depends mostly on the internal resistance of the battery, and the value of stored charge on the supercap. The internal resistance of the supercap will be incredibly low and can probably be discounted.
While its true that an infinitely lage supercap will have negligible voltage dip, that would also cost an infinite amount of money.
With practical sized supercaps, the dip will be smaller, maybe much smaller, but it will not go completely away.
What all this means is that if you have a relatively weak (small) battery, there may be very large dips in voltage during high surge loads, and a supercap can help a great deal with for example, the infamous light flicker problem.
If you have a huge lithiuum battery that is large enough to easily supply peak surge loads, with only a very small voltage dip, adding a supercap is going to do very little to improve things. The voltage HAS to dip before the supercap will supply any current at all. The worse the dip, the more a supercap will earn its keep.
Now the situation arises, if you have a significant voltage dip problem, should the money be spent on adding supercaps, or on upgrading the battery by adding extra cells?
Its not always a clear cut decision.
Both batteries and supercaps are expensive, so its well worth thinking the whole thing right through.
But a supercap will only help paper over the voltage dip problem and give no worthwhile increase in total stored battery amp hours.
A significantly larger battery is going store many extra amp hours, and at mid winter for example, that might be money much better spent than on supercaps, especially if the bigger battery also cures the voltage dip problem.
Personally I would rather spend the money on a larger and better battery, than on supercaps.
But I am sure others will disagree strongly with that.
That's only true for a very short load spike .... It will if the load is extended.That’s the thing, there is negligible voltage drop with a supercap in parallel - it doesn’t sag and return like a LiFePO4 by itself.
There is no capacitor recharge from the battery bank. Under load surge condition the voltage of the battery and capacitor drop together, but much more current comes from the capacitor. When the load is removed the two are still at the same voltage - no current flow. The recharge comes from the charger.
For some reason most people think the supercap discharges into the battery but that is not the case.