timselectric
If I can do it, you can do it.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2022
- Messages
- 18,620
If not, youtube does.
Hard wired.
So this sounds like you could make this work in a few different configurations:I take it to mean you can't use center-tap of neutral to supply neutral of loads, such that the only path to grid neutral/ground is through windings of auto-transformer.
You can tie the center tap to grid neutral (will now try to rebalance grid)
You can tie load's neutral to grid neutral and not use auto-transformer center-tap while fed from grid. If you disconnect from grid, then connect load neutral to center-tap.
Yes, at the current setup.Would your system support 120V loads with wattage totaling inverter (240V) wattage?
You can't float the grid neutral. It's already bonded.Connected to grid/main panel through a mechanical interlock, optional generator with a floating neutral connected to the inverter input.
This is only if you have the N/G bond somewhere else because you need 1 (and only 1) N/G bond somewhere correct? Can't this be either the generator, or the main (once it is installed). Correct.If your generator has a N/G bond. It needs to be removed.
Sorry, generator neutral would be floating.You can't float the grid neutral. It's already bonded
Hmm, this sounds like it would be better having rhe N/G bonding in the load panel only until the main panel is connected would be better than having the N/G bond at the generator.And for safety sake, that should remain a permanent connection.
This would be my recommendation.Hmm, this sounds like it would be better having rhe N/G bonding in the load panel only until the main panel is connected would be better than having the N/G bond at the generator.
Then removing the load N/G bond once connected to the main neutral.
(Trying to develop raw land, with hope of getting grid power within a few months)
Maybe, if the generator is hardwired.This is only if you have the N/G bond somewhere else because you need 1 (and only 1) N/G bond somewhere correct? Can't this be either the generator, or the main (once it is installed). Correct.
Thought about switching to an isolation transformer.
But more losses and space required.
(Trying to develop raw land, with hope of getting grid power within a few months)
Would one of these configurations be able to meet NEC code requirements, or will this Growatt system always need to be under the table and a potential insurance liability if there is ever a fire?
My wife is concerned about my purchase/competence (even more than when I first bought solar and she didn't know the code existed :D)
Not UL listed. So, almost impossible to pass an inspection.Would one of these configurations be able to meet NEC code requirements, or will this Growatt system always need to be under the table and a potential insurance liability if there is ever a fire?
My wife is concerned about my purchase/competence (even more than when I first bought solar and she didn't know the code existed :D)
Not too much of a concern for my 40kw system.Think twice, and find a transformer that is nice to your inverter.
Most are optimized for cost, draw a high but acceptable current from the grid as they go partially into saturation.
You can tie the center tap to grid neutral (will now try to rebalance grid)
You shouldn't do it. It creates a parallel path with the grounding conductor. The only thing that the two sides of an isolation transformer should have in common is the grounding system.I think it is fine to connect transformer secondary neutral to primary source neutral.
The secondary neutral is isolated from the primary conductors. Maybe you are thinking of an autotransformer. Which is required to be connected to the primary source neutral. (If one exists)If you want to backfeed the main breaker panel from inverter (e.g. through transfer switch or interlocked breaker), you probably have to do that anyway. If separately bonded to ground, additional switching will be necessary.