diy solar

diy solar

Sodium ion batteries vs LiFePO4

I typically use Aliexpress for low cost (low risk) items.
Alibaba is better for larger cost items, more protection if anything goes sideways.
All that said, these are not high cost items, maybe it would be cheaper via Aliexpress, now I feel like I have to go look!
oh for USA at least it's quite a bit cheaper for cells there than alibaba + shipping
and yea there are even "18650" type sodium cells available. Pretty cool to see my old li-ion packs are still going though so never even changed to lifepo4 lol.. I'll just wait..

I've got a few coming to my lab soon-ish. I'll test them when I find time.
nice good luck. Finland definitely a place that could use better cold-resistant batteries
 
I am getting the one 12v and one 24v 100Ah battery.
I have some testing I am going to do on the bench, then out in the greenhouse (unheated for this winter) to see what they can, and what they can't do in winter. Excited to see what I find out.
I am expecting they will work at the low temps, but reduced capacity, and since my inverters will not like 1.5v per cell, I expect I will de-rate the battery total energy capacity to match the energy stored between 2.5 and 3.8 volt range.
 
Although the we don't know the X-scale in used the image charge/discharge image, I'm assuming that it is linear. The corresponding voltage curves of a capacitor are logarithmic, and there would be "a lot of weirdness" in in pulling power from parallel devices of the two types.

<snip>

If I may view the graph with a linear X-axis corresponding SOC percentage, a 4S battery pack of the soldium ion cells, however, would only offer 'nearly 220AH' of power storage if allowed discharge from more than 15.6 volts (at high SOC) all the way down to around 8.0 volts. The discharge curve would fall below my minimum of 2.8 volts when about 40% of the battery remains unused.
I would have thought almost certainly the X axis on the graph is linear and represents time during a constant current test. You’re right it’s unclear because it’s not stated, but this is standard for cell testing reports.
 
I wonder if the low temperature capabilities of these new sodium cells and their potentially much lower costs compared to lithium might make them suited to replacing lead acid as car starter batteries? LiFePO4 never quite made it into that application, but are sodium cells going to be better suited or are the CCA cold cranking amps requirements just too high and lead acid will remain the best choice?
 
I wonder if the low temperature capabilities of these new sodium cells and their potentially much lower costs compared to lithium might make them suited to replacing lead acid as car starter batteries? LiFePO4 never quite made it into that application, but are sodium cells going to be better suited or are the CCA cold cranking amps requirements just too high and lead acid will remain the best choice?
Yea basically nothing on their CCA rating yet. There are batteries that also have capacitors in them so that takes the initial high amp hit...
I think the main contender is if the battery is cheaper though, I don't think people care about much else other than if it costs them less lol
 
I would like to see what these can do in my region, it would be awesome to have a battery "like" the LiFePO4 but operable down to -20C without needing heat! (and above 30C without needing A/C!) yeah, I am SO ready for this temperature range. Time to test it out and see what the limitations are for these Sodium batteries.
Imagine a remote cabin with batteries that don't need any special protection any time of the year.
If they work well, my next step will be some DIY Sodium batteries from purchased cells and BMS, and see how that works out.
 
the sodium ion 18650s are a few dollars, around 1300mAh so you can just multiply it by ~100 to get an idea what a 100ah would give
worth getting it to test that
 
There seems to be some relatively serious investment going into sodium batteries.
At this point, it looks more feasible for large energy storage projects, though the 5000 cycle is considerably less than Lithium provides so it seems like there would have to be a very substantial cost offset.
Time will tell.

 
Plenty of development here in Europe as well, for example:



And more...
 
There seems to be some relatively serious investment going into sodium batteries.
At this point, it looks more feasible for large energy storage projects, though the 5000 cycle is considerably less than Lithium provides so it seems like there would have to be a very substantial cost offset.
Time will tell.

The net energy will be the scale to evaluate: if an energy storage system needs to use a portion of that stored energy for temperature regulation with Lithium, but does not need temperature regulation with Sodium - this will be a huge impact.

Imagine the energy use for A/C just to keep batteries cool in hot locations (like TX, AZ, NM, So-Cal), or likewise the energy to maintain at least 32F temps in colder climates (AK, Canada, Finland, etc) - a cell that needs no heating or cooling is a big win.

All that said, the Sodium cells have a much wider voltage curve and to use them with existing inverters, I expect we will not use the full voltage range. This will be a pos and neg thing" pos - the cells will last a long time being cycled through a smaller voltage range than their capacity; neg - the availabel usable capacity will be lower. I am excited to get some to try out.
 
I really don't care what people have to say about the need for new charging methods. I intend to build a daily commuter car for my 10-mile round-trip for work. It'll have dual 48-volt banks that get connected in series when the car is powered up. I'll charge it from my home battery bank and each will have a 16-S (32s) BMS. Given the voltage range of the cells, I don't see why I'd need to be concerned. My home solar can't exceed the safe voltage and the cells are good down to 1.5 volts. I believe that people are over-thinking. I'll be staying well within the voltage range and be able to charge my car without pre-heating the battery packs. If there is a legitimate concern that I'm overlooking, I'm very receptive to constructive criticism. If it's that I'm wasting the potential of the cells, this is not my concern.
 
Last edited:
I really don't care what people have to say about the need for new charging methods. I intend to build a daily commuter car for my 10-mile round-trip for work. It'll have dual 48-volt banks that get connected in series when the car is powered up. I'll charge it from my home battery bank and each will have a 16-S BMS. Given the voltage range of the cells, I don't see why I'd need to be concerned. My home solar can't exceed the safe voltage and the cells are good down to 1.5 volts. I believe that people are over-thinking. I'll be staying well within the voltage range and be able to charge my car without pre-heating the battery packs. If there is a legitimate concern that I'm overlooking, I'm very receptive to constructive criticism. If it's that I'm wasting the potential of the cells, this is not my concern.
Do you have an inverter in mind that will work with the wide voltage range of the sodium cells? Curious.
ie 16s @ 1.5 volt = 24v, if you series two packs = 48v at the low end, but at the top end 4v x 16 = 64v and series connected x 2 =128 volt,
How will you utilize 48 to 128 volt range?
 
Do you have an inverter in mind that will work with the wide voltage range of the sodium cells? Curious.
ie 16s @ 1.5 volt = 24v, if you series two packs = 48v at the low end, but at the top end 4v x 16 = 64v and series connected x 2 =128 volt,
How will you utilize 48 to 128 volt range?
Each BMS will be 32s. I intend to use two of the same BMS that I would use for a 48-volt LiFePo4 battery. My home battery system is Lead-Acid and, when either or both of the 48-volt banks is switched to the charging position, it will disable the ignition switch and each car battery bank will charge directly from my home batteries and from the off-grid inverter. I see no reason for the need of any inversion. I have enough DC electrical knowledge to wire this up. My only concern is finding the appropriate contactor. There is little need for more than 96 volts in my city car but I'm aware that the upper end of the battery voltage will hit 117.2 volts when all of the batteries are connected because my home system is charged at 58.6 volts. This 3.6625 volts per cell is well within the safe range of the Sodium Ion cells. Still, I know that I'm only human so it is possible that I haven't considered all factors. As for DC to DC for 12vdc accessories, that should be simple enough. If anyone thinks to warn that the charging characteristics of Lead-Acid could cause damage to my new cells, I've thought about this and have purchased a device explained in this video.
 
Last edited:
Interesting,
what motor do you have in mind for this project?
I explained to the salesperson that I want to be able to reach and maintain 55 mph for as much as 7/10 of a mile 10 times per week without harming the drivetrain. This is the kit she suggested.
 
Last edited:
I explained to the salesperson that I want to be able to reach and maintain 55 mph for as much as 7/10 of a mile 10 times per week without harming the drivetrain. This is the kit she suggested.
I hope you post your build and how it performs, interested to see the result.
 
The automotive industry should be interested too. They make city cars too complicated and expensive for their purpose and if anything can reduce a carbon footprint, this can. The cost for the drivetrain is $2800 not counting shipping.
 
Long before Solar, I was/am a car buff.
Seeing these kits coming on line is very exciting. Part of the reason for my own interest in Sodium batteries - Canadian Winters. LOL.
I leaned from this forum and YouTube to build my own battery packs, and now have six 280/304's plus smaller 12 and 24 volt packs and more E-bike battery packs than I can count.
Building batteries was a stepping stone to learn what it might take to build a car battery from cells.
 

diy solar

diy solar
Back
Top