Lt.Dan
Solar Wizard
I've actually had a couple SSD's fail in the last few years. But not doing the very simple thing that Solar Assistant does. They aren't as reliable as some people think they are. But they definitely have a longer lifespan than an SD card.
I'm on Pierre's side from SolarAssistant. Most of the time when an SD card fails, its a cheap $5 unit they pulled out of their junk drawer and are now upset. Solar Assistant is very very low disk usage. Yes, it is reading/writing, but its a HELL of a lot less than other devices, like security cameras etc. I don't see how Solar Assistant can be responsible for corrupting an SD Card unless it was on its last leg to begin with. And just like Pierre said, "It's rare that you need to reflash the SD card, unfortunately it's hard to tell why it was necessary." You can't prove that Solar Assistant was the one to kill it, because there's no way of knowing.
At the end, I do agree that an SSD is a better fit. That being said, I still have a Sandisk SD card in mine.
I'm on Pierre's side from SolarAssistant. Most of the time when an SD card fails, its a cheap $5 unit they pulled out of their junk drawer and are now upset. Solar Assistant is very very low disk usage. Yes, it is reading/writing, but its a HELL of a lot less than other devices, like security cameras etc. I don't see how Solar Assistant can be responsible for corrupting an SD Card unless it was on its last leg to begin with. And just like Pierre said, "It's rare that you need to reflash the SD card, unfortunately it's hard to tell why it was necessary." You can't prove that Solar Assistant was the one to kill it, because there's no way of knowing.
At the end, I do agree that an SSD is a better fit. That being said, I still have a Sandisk SD card in mine.