diy solar

diy solar

Can Solar & Wind Fix Everything (e.g., Climate Change) with a battery break-through?

You attack the person instead of talking about the information and data.

100% toxic female behavior. It would be better to admit that you don't understand basic climate science.

Toxic female behavior?

You realize you just outed yourself a one of those religious misogynist right?
 
I stopped wasting my time trying to explain science to stupid people a long time ago.

Also, I don't talk about fraudulent information and data.. that kind of stuff is for the ignorant and gullible pawns.


Here, let me point you in the right direction genius...

The "critique" was "peer reviewed" at clintel dot org.. My bull$hit detector went off... hmm.. lets see.. who owns clintel.. its owned by a guy named Augustinus Johannes "Guus" Berkhout.. Who worked for the oil companies.

When I asked "how stupid can you be".. it wasn't a challenge.

Its like one of these idiots who walks into a church and asks the pastor if god is real... then you get upset with me that I attacked the source instead of the data? Damn are people utterly stupid.

That's two more posts spent trying to be mean to people in hopes that you'll make.them feels bad instead of addressing the information and data.
 
That's two more posts spent trying to be mean to people in hopes that you'll make.them feels bad instead of addressing the information and data.
Intelligent people learn from their mistakes but you seem to be addressing your feelings. I do not have a snowflake mode.
 

Thread Recap​

This thread has been a journey. I started off as a skeptic/denier, but bad science is usually debunked after a decade and the whole topic of climate change had been around far too long not to give it a second look with an open mind. So I open Bill Gate’s book How to Avoid a Climate Disaster and saw problems. Bill's book was not the type of book I was looking for, but it did raise questions.

The biggest issue I had with Bill's book is it seemed reasonable to me that an energy storage solution (e.g., a battery) could be tied with wind and solar to resolve the crisis and the rest of it was noise, so I started this thread to see what others thought. From the OP it seemed ESS could get us all but about 28%.

Mainly I've been a proponent of a low-cost ESS solution (which seems very feasible) because it would make wind and solar the lowest LCOE providers, and our natural capitalism steak could have the pro-climate people less concerned and reduce costs for everyone. That is a win-win.
But that lingering 28% was still a lot if climate change was something to worry about.

Planting more trees didn't seem like the answer (#8). So I went looking for other books and not finding anything started doing some research and posting the findings for discussion as I had a lot of questions in terms of the validity of the science. That starts at post #9, based on the half-life of GreenHouse Gases (GHGs), and recognizing the buildup I started changing my tune and seeing the value of net-zero. But I still had a lot of questions and the thread hit many subtopics:

The most promising energy storage solution I see so far are flywheels.

Amber Kinetics for example. There M32 stores 32kWh of energy, unlimited cycles, 85% efficient.
 
Oh Oh


 
People are most definitely becoming aware of the climate scam.


"
Some media companies are also aware that scepticism about Net Zero and the climate catastrophisation that promotes it is gaining ground in the wider population. Last month, the Daily Sceptic reported that climate scepticism was on the rise throughout the world, as populations start to grasp the effects of the looming Net Zero disaster. A recent poll conducted by a group within the University of Chicago found that belief in humans causing all or most climate change had slumped in America to 49% from the 60% level recorded just five years ago. Last year, a major Ipsos survey covering two thirds of the world’s population revealed that nearly four in every 10 people believe climate change is mainly due to natural causes.

Perhaps worryingly for the BBC and the Guardian with their steadily shrinking audiences, the Chicago survey found climate scepticism increasing more rapidly in left-wing Democrat circles than among Republican. In addition, support for human-caused climate change fell by 17% among young people aged 18-29."
 
What this is really all about is control over you.


1. The World Health Organisation is not independent, and is significantly privately directed.
2. People in democracies cannot be subject to dictatorships.
3. The WHO is not accountable to those it seeks to control.
4. Centralisation through the WHO is poor policy by incompetent people.
5. Real pandemics are not common, and are not becoming more common.

It makes no sense to grant a foreign-based, unaccountable institution powers that contradict democratic norms and good public health policy. More so when this institution has limited expertise and a poor track record, is directed by private interests and influenced by authoritarian governments. This is obviously counter to what a government in a democracy is supposed to do.

This is not a matter of domestic political rivalries. However, the public relations departments of the prospective beneficiaries of this perpetual health emergency project would like us to believe it is. We are currently funding the dismantling of our own independence and ceding our human rights to a small group that stands to benefit from our impoverishment, financed from a war chest accrued through the pandemic just ended. We don’t have to. It is as straightforward to see through this as it should be to stop it. All that is needed is clarity, honesty and a little courage.
 

‘No one gives a s--- about’ climate change — this is what it should be called instead

“So my thing is, let’s go and rephrase this and communicate differently about it and really tell people — we’re talking about pollution. Pollution creates climate change, and pollution kills,” Schwarzenegger said.

Scientists warned about climate change in 1965

A report to the US president sounded an alarm — humankind was ‘conducting a vast geophysical experiment’ by burning fossil fuels and filling the atmosphere with an ‘invisible pollutant.’ But a slick campaign by Big Oil led to confusion, politicization and dire consequences for the planet.

Is Kelp the Next Ocean Hero?

New research shows we’ve long underestimated the environmental benefits from kelp forests. Now these important ecosystems are threatened.
 

It’s typical. All three Climate Alarmists were spouting the usual talking points, and when Milloy scoffed at them, they couldn’t stand it, and Mr. Pereira got so exercised that he threatend to leave the show, and then he couldn’t stand to let Milloy speak anymore constantly talking over him.

This is typical fanatic behavior. They have their mind made up on a subject and you aren’t going to change it, and if you try, they will do everything they can to shut you up. Your words are extremely upsetting to their worldview and they lash out viciously, calling the truth-teller all sorts of names.

Yes, the Climate Alarmists had all the talking points down, but none of those talking points stand up to scrutiny, as most of us already know.

I think we had three True Believer Climate Alarmists on this show. I think they are sincere in their CO2 delusions. This allows them to speak forcefully in support of their religion, but they still don’t have any evidence to back up any of their dire claims. Any of their dire claims. All they have are assumptions and assertions, which is not evidence of anything.

Mr. Pereira’s behavior is typical of a radical Leftist: Very Nasty when you disagree with him..
 
Last edited:

It’s typical. All three Climate Alarmists were spouting the usual talking points, and when Milloy scoffed at them, they couldn’t stand it, and Mr. Pereira got so exercised that he threatend to leave the show, and then he couldn’t stand to let Milloy speak anymore constantly talking over him.

This is typical fanatic behavior. They have their mind made up on a subject and you aren’t going to change it, and if you try, they will do everything they can to shut you up. Your words are extremely upsetting to their worldview and they lash out viciously, calling the truth-teller all sorts of names.

Yes, the Climate Alarmists had all the talking points down, but none of those talking points stand up to scrutiny, as most of us already know.

I think we had three True Believer Climate Alarmists on this show. I think they are sincere in their CO2 delusions. This allows them to speak forcefully in support of their religion, but they still don’t have any evidence to back up any of their dire claims. Any of their dire claims. All they have are assumptions and assertions, which is not evidence of anything.

Mr. Pereira’s behavior is typical of a radical Leftist: Very Nasty when you disagree with him..
1685565167179.png


 

Highest US gas price was in 2005 under George W. Bush

 
Last edited:

Explaining climate change science & rebutting global warming misinformation

Global warming is real and human-caused. It is leading to large-scale climate change. Under the guise of climate "skepticism", the public is bombarded with misinformation that casts doubt on the reality of human-caused global warming. This website gets skeptical about global warming "skepticism".

Our mission is simple: debunk climate misinformation by presenting peer-reviewed science and explaining the techniques of science denial, discourses of climate delay, and climate solutions denial.
 
Svetz am sorry if you feel your post is being messed up. All can offer is when a problem exist we have to look at the whole problem to find a confirmed real solution.

We have repaired our environment to the current level vs the past. Reminder to everyone we have done so several times throughout our past. We had smog but we cleaned it up for vehicles and such. We stopped burning high sulfur coals and put scrubbers on exhaust stacks. We stopped coast guard from openly dumping batteries into rivers. We stopped major corporations from polluting which in some cases they left the mess and our country headed to china. We probably still get acid rain although it is not reported as much anymore.

we are still allowing the Amazon Rain forest to be destroyed. Which is insane. We have sanctioned our own companies in usa time and time again. Gibson Guitars is one example of a law breaker. Other countries jumped in to suck up where we left off.

it should be obvious both sides of the political aisle in washington dc are playing games and steering monies. Crooks. They can’t be trusted with a sack of shit even if they are muzzled.

Again sorry if you feel your post is polluted. You have spent a lot of your spare time on it.
 
Back
Top