Threatening to hang the Vice President if he doesn't do your bidding is democracy? Jeez you are a nutcase!
Can the electrical grid handle a boom in electric vehicles?
- Thread starter svetz
- Start date
So the rest of the world was in on this "scheme too"....all to get Trump? Go back into your closet.
Last edited:
LeoThomson
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2022
- Messages
- 3,469
He is trolling, no one is that stupid.
teal95
Solar Addict
There is no formal nor even defined action for a President to declassify documents. It can be easily construed that by a President removing a classified document from government property he is declassifying it. Otherwise why hasn't Obama been prosecuted for the classified documents that were found in his collection that is stored in an unguarded warehouse outside Chicago? Hillary OTOH was never President, and the documents that were found on her server were from after Bill was President so she has no defense.
As for Trump having evidence on Hunter, what good would that do? There is plenty of evidence on the laptop that the FBI, DoJ and media keep trying to bury, but nothing has been done.
As for Trump having evidence on Hunter, what good would that do? There is plenty of evidence on the laptop that the FBI, DoJ and media keep trying to bury, but nothing has been done.
National Archives had sole custody of Obama's documents in Chicago and they came out with a statement in mid August that none were even classified.
Gotta love the right wing conspiracy theories.
So then explain exactly what the contents of the documents were, why Trump would have taken them, and why the DOJ wanted them so badly. You cant so my speculation is as good as anyone elses.
I mean its not like the Presidents son is not up to his eyeballs in scandal, and the deep state hasnt been trying to get Trump since day 1.
Who said anything about "the rest of the world"? Typical liberal, pervert facts or you dont have an argument. The virus came from CHINA. NOT the rest of the world. Hell you could unleash this thing with the participation and knowledge of less than 100 people.
A focus of Trumps policies had long been restraining Chinas trade offenses. Youre pretending it wouldnt be in their best interests if Biden were elected not Trump?
Hell theyd already paid Hunter millions of dollars. We know China loves the Bidens.
The election was rigged. Period.
“Zuckerbucks” and the 2020 Election
Zuckerberg’s help to Democrats is well known when it comes to censoring their political opponents in the name of preventing “misinformation.” Less well known is the fact that he directly funded liberal groups running partisan get-out-the-vote operations. In fact, he helped those groups...
imprimis.hillsdale.edu
Theres evidence out there indicating corruption by Joe Biden for his son.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden’s Ukraine story
Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents – many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles – conflict with Joe Biden’s nar…
thehill.com
Maybe Trump wanted to clear his name over the first fake impeachment.
LeoThomson
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2022
- Messages
- 3,469
Both impeachments were real lol.
As were both acquittals. The first impeachment was purely political theatre. Note the articles of impeachment did not contain any actual offenses against US code.
LeoThomson
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2022
- Messages
- 3,469
Those were real as well.
The taliban initially offered bin laden be tried in afghanistan if we offered evidence.
As it appeared we were about to attack them, on Oct 4, 2001, they offered he be extradited to Pakistan to be tried under Sharia law by an Islamic court.
We began to bomb afghanistan on Oct 7.
It wasnt until Oct 15 that the taliban offered extradition to a "3rd country" and even then they put conditions on it that it wouldnt be a country under US influence.
The fact he WAS ultimately harbored in Pakistan proves the offers made before we attacked them were unacceptable.
Provide this evidence. And if it even existed how would this override an NIE?
But lets see what you got. I think youre making this up.
Dumb. Fallacious logic. You dont have a crystal ball to find out what happened when we pulled out, Saddam rearmed and attacked his neighbors.
Yeah right, everyones a civilian if they are cowards fighting out of uniform.
Well that is an argument you would lose BECAUSE THE INDISPUTABLE FACT IS THAT SADDAM HUSSEIN WAS THE NUMBER 1 STATE SPONSOR OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM IN THE YEARS BEFORE WE INVADED IRAQ.
As I briefly outlined above that is a false representation of the Talibans offers.
And there was no "Afghan government" in 2001. The taliban was not officially recognized as their government by anyone but a couple of fringe Islamic states. They could not even have guaranteed security if an extradition had been agreed upon which was why Pakistans prime minister refused to be involved with and transfer into his country before we attacked the taliban.
Your entire position on this matter is based on a false pretense.
Wrong. Thats the third and least significant of three points that Al Qaeda stated in their 1998 fatwa. The first two were directly related to our policies containing Saddam. Ill provide that document shortly to prove this to you.
Here you are.
This demonstrates why 9/11 brought Iraq policy to the forefront.
And note that with Saddam providing bounties for Palestinian suicide bombings, resulting in harsh reprisals against the Palestinians, even that third point is actually directly related to Iraq.
This demonstrates why 9/11 brought Iraq policy to the forefront.
And note that with Saddam providing bounties for Palestinian suicide bombings, resulting in harsh reprisals against the Palestinians, even that third point is actually directly related to Iraq.
Its safe to assume that if legal CCW and open carry become more common, more guns will actually be stolen from people and end up on the black market and in the hands of criminals. Lets face it people are going to treat their guns like another cumbersome accesory to tote around, and will leave it in their car when going to a restaurant or movie where it will be stolen by thieves.
LeoThomson
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2022
- Messages
- 3,469
Oct. 14, 2001 -- The United States today rejected yet another offer by Afghanistan's ruling Taliban to turn over Osama bin Laden for trial in a third country if the U.S. presents evidence against bin Laden and stops air attacks.
U.S. Rejects New Taliban Offer
abcnews.go.com
LeoThomson
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2022
- Messages
- 3,469
In comparison about 3,000 civilians died on 9/11.
LeoThomson
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2022
- Messages
- 3,469
From the Downing street memo's
"The Defence Secretary said that the US had already begun "spikes of activity" to put pressure on the regime. No decisions had been taken, but he thought the most likely timing in US minds for military action to begin was January, with the timeline beginning 30 days before the US Congressional elections.
The Foreign Secretary said he would discuss this with Colin Powell this week. It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force.
The Attorney-General said that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action. There were three possible legal bases: self-defence, humanitarian intervention, or UNSC authorisation. The first and second could not be the base in this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three years ago would be difficult. The situation might of course change."
Text of Downing Street Memo
The Times of London reported on May 1, 2005 about a 2002 confidential British memo describing how President Bush built his case for the Iraq war. The following is the text of the document, dubbed the "Downing Street memo."
www.pbs.org
Even republicans were upset, like the former United States Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under President Ronald Reagan.
And have a look at the false "yellowcake uranium" claim
Joseph C. Wilson - Wikipedia
Last edited:
LeoThomson
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2022
- Messages
- 3,469
Sadam was a dick, but surely you don't want to invade countries because their leaders are dicks in your view, right?
LeoThomson
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2022
- Messages
- 3,469
Provide evidence for that allegation.
BTW are you are aware that there was a time that the US even sponsored the taliban?
LeoThomson
Solar Addict
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2022
- Messages
- 3,469
That is what Osama Bin Laden claimed as his motivation.
Did you know Israel was founded in part by illegal imigrants to Palestine? And that to this day Jews can easily migrate to Israel, but Palestinian refugees are not allowed to return to their home?
Batshit...you couldn't even make it through high school. Take your lithium and get some sleep.The election was rigged. Period.
“Zuckerbucks” and the 2020 Election
Zuckerberg’s help to Democrats is well known when it comes to censoring their political opponents in the name of preventing “misinformation.” Less well known is the fact that he directly funded liberal groups running partisan get-out-the-vote operations. In fact, he helped those groups...
We had already been bombing the country for a week when they made that offer. But then I already told you this.Oct. 14, 2001 -- The United States today rejected yet another offer by Afghanistan's ruling Taliban to turn over Osama bin Laden for trial in a third country if the U.S. presents evidence against bin Laden and stops air attacks.
U.S. Rejects New Taliban Offer
Ha. You have NOTHING. What report did legislaters have in their hands which would have greater significance than a NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE?From the Downing street memo's
"The Defence Secretary said that the US had already begun "spikes of activity" to put pressure on the regime. No decisions had been taken, but he thought the most likely timing in US minds for military action to begin was January, with the timeline beginning 30 days before the US Congressional elections.
The Foreign Secretary said he would discuss this with Colin Powell this week. It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force.
The Attorney-General said that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action. There were three possible legal bases: self-defence, humanitarian intervention, or UNSC authorisation. The first and second could not be the base in this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three years ago would be difficult. The situation might of course change."
Text of Downing Street Memo
The Times of London reported on May 1, 2005 about a 2002 confidential British memo describing how President Bush built his case for the Iraq war. The following is the text of the document, dubbed the "Downing Street memo."
Even republicans were upset, like the former United States Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under President Ronald Reagan.
And have a look at the false "yellowcake uranium" claim
Joseph C. Wilson - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Youve provided zero evidence.
Joe Wilson never even filed a report. He made false claims to the media MONTHS after the war began.
Downing st memo claims Bush made up his mind to go to war already. OF COURSE HE DID, HOW DOES THAT PROVE THAT ANYONE KNEW SADDAM HAD DISARMED OR THAT HE HAD DISARMED?
Why do I care to argue with the unreasonable? Get back to me when you can prove your claims as anything but revisionist history. Youre just throwing silly innuendo up like Im dumb enough to buy it.
For the last time. Congress and the white house both requested an NIE be produced on Iraq WMD. Their votes on the joint resolution was based on that. NOT ONE SINGLE DOCUMENT was issued by any US intelligence agency before the war that contradicted its judgements. AND failure to find WMD is not evidence that none existed before the invasion.
In 1996. In his own fatwa, which was superceded by the 1998 fatwa in which all al qaeda leaders were signatory to.
Did you know that youre just trying to be obtuse rather than admit you were wrong?.
Al qaeda was pissed that our iraq policy was harming arab muslims. If they were only pissed at israel about palestinians why did they attack the US? Oh darn those facts again.
I dont give a **** about jews or palestinians, if you want to make a big deal about it go back to the UN and 1948. The holocaust was kind of on peoples minds then. That has nothing to do with this argument which is that our Iraq policy had to drastically change because of 9/11. Bin Laden signed the 1998 fatwa.
Similar threads
