Threatening to hang the Vice President if he doesn't do your bidding is democracy? Jeez you are a nutcase!Nope. That IS democracy.
Threatening to hang the Vice President if he doesn't do your bidding is democracy? Jeez you are a nutcase!Nope. That IS democracy.
So the rest of the world was in on this "scheme too"....all to get Trump? Go back into your closet.BTW time is also revealing Trumps covid response was perfect and Fauci was a literal psychopath, and knew all along it came from a Wuhan lab. Since Trump was criticized for closing travel from China its not a stretch to think the Chinese, allied with Democrats, plotted the whole thing to remove Trump.
He is trolling, no one is that stupid.Threatening to hang the Vice President if he doesn't do your bidding is democracy? Jeez you are a nutcase!
National Archives had sole custody of Obama's documents in Chicago and they came out with a statement in mid August that none were even classified.There is no formal nor even defined action for a President to declassify documents. It can be easily construed that by a President removing a classified document from government property he is declassifying it. Otherwise why hasn't Obama been prosecuted for the classified documents that were found in his collection that is stored in an unguarded warehouse outside Chicago? Hillary OTOH was never President, and the documents that were found on her server were from after Bill was President so she has no defense.
As for Trump having evidence on Hunter, what good would that do? There is plenty of evidence on the laptop that the FBI, DoJ and media keep trying to bury, but nothing has been done.
So then explain exactly what the contents of the documents were, why Trump would have taken them, and why the DOJ wanted them so badly. You cant so my speculation is as good as anyone elses.Surely you are not serious. (I can't stop laughing)
So the rest of the world was in on this "scheme too"....all to get Trump? Go back into your closet.
The election was rigged. Period.I knew once the meds were off you would come back.
The latest conspiracy you have is that documents implicate Hunter Biden? Are you really that completely nuts...oh wait...you thought people were chasing you with direct energy weapons.
The rest of your rant is just ridiculous. Trump was not robbed. Most normal, non election denier Republicans, also don't claim he was robbed....or were is it your conspiracy theory that they were also in on the fix.
Theres evidence out there indicating corruption by Joe Biden for his son.Surely you are not serious. (I can't stop laughing)
Both impeachments were real lol.Maybe Trump wanted to clear his name over the first fake impeachment.
As were both acquittals. The first impeachment was purely political theatre. Note the articles of impeachment did not contain any actual offenses against US code.Both impeachments were real lol.
Those were real as well.As were both acquittals.
I would have accepted for Bin Laden to be tried in another country.
Yes, but it show yet again that making decisions in anger, like invading other nations, is dumb. Bin Laden was ultimate found and killed not in Afghanistan, but in Pakistan.
even though there were indications at the time that they were being manufactured.
History shows that I was right, The war cost Trillions and nothing good came from it.
There were 2,456 United States military deaths in the War in Afghanistan. And more than 70,000 Afghan and Pakistani civilians are estimated to have died as a direct result of the war.
I am not going to argue who the biggest state sponsor of terrorism is
After refusing the offer of the Afghan government (which I loath btw) to send Osama Bin Laden for trial abroad, I think it was the only acceptable outcome for Americans. I would have preferred to see him tried for his vile crimes, rather than seeing him turned into a martyr.
Actually, 9/11 stems from Jewish occupation of Palestine and the treatment of Palestinians. This was and is supported by many countries in the West, including the US.
That is the statistic I read too. Maybe if it was broken down further, a pattern would emerge.
I think most of the harm to family is from unsecured guns. A San Jose cop's son found his personal handgun in night stand and shot himself with it. I read the DA's tortured 4-page argument why there was no criminal negligence, e.g. "his service weapon was left on the bed with blanket covering it, and holster was so tight child would not have been able to draw" "He often kept loaded gun on a high shelf, child would not have been able to reach."
Other times, a gun is taken away from the person. Happened to a lady from my school and work. She was apparently in the habit of carrying a gun when walking her dog, lived at her parents' house in Hayward. Someone took it and used it on her.
Also domestic violence.
I think if one always has gun secured (e.g. in fingerprint safe) or else in concealed holster, much of the risk is avoided.
With CCW process involving $hundreds and training and paperwork, I don't think that will in particular lead to poorly vetted people carrying legally. I think the people who are a problem will largely continue to carry not in compliance, and will continue to have access to guns at home or in vehicle. Legalizing law abiding citizens carrying after jumping through hoops not likely increase illegal violence.
In Oakland (?) someone said they were going to have to spend a huge amount of money performing background checks on CCW applicants to make sure they weren't going to do the next mass shooting ?!
Oct. 14, 2001 -- The United States today rejected yet another offer by Afghanistan's ruling Taliban to turn over Osama bin Laden for trial in a third country if the U.S. presents evidence against bin Laden and stops air attacks.The taliban initially offered bin laden be tried in afghanistan if we offered evidence.
In comparison about 3,000 civilians died on 9/11.Yeah right, everyones a civilian if they are cowards fighting out of uniform.
From the Downing street memo'sProvide this evidence
Sadam was a dick, but surely you don't want to invade countries because their leaders are dicks in your view, right?Dumb. Fallacious logic. You dont have a crystal ball to find out what happened when we pulled out, Saddam rearmed and attacked his neighbors.
Provide evidence for that allegation.SADDAM HUSSEIN WAS THE NUMBER 1 STATE SPONSOR OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM
Wrong. Thats the third and least significant of three points that Al Qaeda stated in their 1998 fatwa. The first two were directly related to our policies containing Saddam. Ill provide that document shortly to prove this to you.
Batshit...you couldn't even make it through high school. Take your lithium and get some sleep.The election was rigged. Period.
“Zuckerbucks” and the 2020 Election
Zuckerberg’s help to Democrats is well known when it comes to censoring their political opponents in the name of preventing “misinformation.” Less well known is the fact that he directly funded liberal groups running partisan get-out-the-vote operations. In fact, he helped those groups...imprimis.hillsdale.edu
We had already been bombing the country for a week when they made that offer. But then I already told you this.Oct. 14, 2001 -- The United States today rejected yet another offer by Afghanistan's ruling Taliban to turn over Osama bin Laden for trial in a third country if the U.S. presents evidence against bin Laden and stops air attacks.
U.S. Rejects New Taliban Offer
abcnews.go.com
Ha. You have NOTHING. What report did legislaters have in their hands which would have greater significance than a NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE?From the Downing street memo's
"The Defence Secretary said that the US had already begun "spikes of activity" to put pressure on the regime. No decisions had been taken, but he thought the most likely timing in US minds for military action to begin was January, with the timeline beginning 30 days before the US Congressional elections.
The Foreign Secretary said he would discuss this with Colin Powell this week. It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force.
The Attorney-General said that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action. There were three possible legal bases: self-defence, humanitarian intervention, or UNSC authorisation. The first and second could not be the base in this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three years ago would be difficult. The situation might of course change."
Text of Downing Street Memo
The Times of London reported on May 1, 2005 about a 2002 confidential British memo describing how President Bush built his case for the Iraq war. The following is the text of the document, dubbed the "Downing Street memo."www.pbs.org
Even republicans were upset, like the former United States Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under President Ronald Reagan.
And have a look at the false "yellowcake uranium" claim
Joseph C. Wilson - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
In 1996. In his own fatwa, which was superceded by the 1998 fatwa in which all al qaeda leaders were signatory to.That is what Osama Bin Laden claimed as his motivation.
Did you know Israel was founded in part by illegal imigrants to Palestine? And that to this day Jews can easily migrate to Israel, but Palestinian refugees are not allowed to return to their home?