diy solar

diy solar

Small wind turbines no longer worth it?

HighDesertOffgrid said:
The clamp meter and weather station have some inefficiencies, I'm sure. That is the data I gathered, along with my original post.
Click to expand...

Weather stations tend to sample several seconds apart (mine is like 18 seconds). I'm just saying that there's no way your turbine is collecting 28W in 3mph wind. That's below the start-up speed. I'm saying in order for your turbine to collect 28W, wind has to be moving at 11.5mph.

If your wind turbine is significantly higher than your weather station, you're going to get faster wind speed. If your anemometer is influence by turbulence from structures, it will typically read lower.
 
sunshine_eggo said:
Weather stations tend to sample several seconds apart (mine is like 18 seconds). I'm just saying that there's no way your turbine is collecting 28W in 3mph wind. That's below the start-up speed. I'm saying in order for your turbine to collect 28W, wind has to be moving at 11.5mph.

If your wind turbine is significantly higher than your weather station, you're going to get faster wind speed. If your anemometer is influence by turbulence from structures, it will typically read lower.
Click to expand...
You are correct on all counts. I edited my last comment to reflect that. There is a very light breeze at the moment, enough to spin the prop, but not enough to get breaking voltage or an accurate reading on the ammeter. I could disconnect the leads and get a more accurate reading in millis but I'm not that motivated.
 
sunshine_eggo said:
assuming a typical 30% efficiency rating.
Click to expand...
Although... we should ascertain where this typical 30% rating comes from and if it applies to micro wind turbines designed for low winds. Most wind generation data is going to come from large commercial turbines with a much larger rotating mass than my toy.
 
I can personally testify as well as point to studies that painfully document that ALL small wind turbines will have a negative financial ROI when used in grid tied systems. That is, they will cost you more money to purchase, install and maintain than they will ever save you.

Oh sure someone one will point out a very unique situation with some pretty hefty incentives but those are the exceptions that hide the true economics. Please prove me wrong, all I ask is that you supply data. I want to be wrong because I really want small wind to work.

Off grid is a bit of a different beast though. No, I'm not saying small wind makes sense for off grid. It will be a complete loser compared to solar in regions that have sun 12 months per year. But it will likely be cheaper per KWH than a gas generator when you don't have any sun.
 
Last edited:
OzSolar said:
I can personally testify as well as point to studies that painfully document that ALL small wind turbines will have a negative financial ROI when used in grid tied systems. That is, they will cost you more money to purchase, install and maintain than they will ever save you.

Oh sure someone one will point out a very unique situation with some pretty hefty incentives but those are the exceptions that hide the true economics. Please prove me wrong, all I ask is that you supply data. I want to be wrong because I really want small wind to work.

Off grid is different beast though. No, I'm not saying small wind makes sense for off grid. It will be a complete loser compared to solar in regions that have sun 12 months per year. But it will likely be cheaper per KWH than a gas generator when you don't have any sun.
Click to expand...
I would go as far to say that any wind DOES NOT makes sense as an ALTERNATIVE to solar at the present (except in Fairbanks, AK maybe). It has no place in any grid tied system for financial ROI. As a supplement to solar in off grid applications it may have a place because it is hard to put a monetary value on the ability to make coffee with your batteries before sunrise. ;)
 
HighDesertOffgrid said:
Although... we should ascertain where this typical 30% rating comes from and if it applies to micro wind turbines designed for low winds. Most wind generation data is going to come from large commercial turbines with a much larger rotating mass than my toy.
Click to expand...

Micro wind turbines are by definition not designed for low winds UNLESS they have a high blade count. The high blade count usually means a lower cut-in speed, but the additional blades actually reduce overall efficiency.

I realize I'm coming across as mostly negative. That's not my intent. I'm very glad you have something that is giving benefit. Part of me still wants to go with a ~7' dia micro turbine, but even then, the ROI is very very poor, and we get some crazy winds up North. A full installation on a 24' tower is about $2400.

Problem is the average is pretty sad: 8-10mph. That means 80W when I'm lucky with many days pulling in nothing. There are a lot of MWandS installations in my area, and most of the time, they're not spinning. On average, it will produce the same as about 300W of solar.

Due to the gusting and turbulence, I'm also inclined to go VAWT, but that performance is even more atrocious.
 
sunshine_eggo said:
Micro wind turbines are by definition not designed for low winds UNLESS they have a high blade count.
Click to expand...
My time in the pilot's seat infers that blade pitch has a role to play in that equation. The big boys (turbines) have variable pitch built into the design (which I may play with in the future for fun). But blade count isn't the only factor.
sunshine_eggo said:
I realize I'm coming across as mostly negative. That's not my intent
Click to expand...
I have no internalized need to be right. I enjoy the discussion.
I may look into a Hurricane Wind 1000w. They don't have certs, but seem to have good reviews.
Carry on eggo!
 
HighDesertOffgrid said:
I don't understand your meaning. I don't know of any other statistical data from the NWS or NOAH pertaining to wind speed other than mph?
Click to expand...

Miles per hours is good, but my point is that linear "mean" average isn't weighted in a way that relates to power production.
The average would need to be of speed raised to the power of 3, because power production is proportional to that.


1 mile per hour average and constant 1 mph 24 hours day won't produce anything from a turbine, and energy theoretically available is proportional to 24 x 1^3 = 24 <something> units. and 1 mph average.

0 miles per hour 23 hours followed by 24 miles per hour would make power, energy proportional to 1 x 24^3 = 13,824 <something> units. but 1 mph average.

The latter is 576 times greater.
I think it is same has having a constant speed of (24^3/24)^(1/3) = 8.3 mph (not "average" of 1 mph)
 
HighDesertOffgrid said:
ROI $ is not as clear cut as a simple wattage calculation for me. As the majority of my winds are after sundown, lessening cycle depth plays some part on battery life. I don't have any with/without wind assistance longevity data, but I know it helps some.
As heat is the enemy of electronics, taking some load from my charge controllers during the day helps to a smaller degree as well.

Model:
View attachment 117689

For braking, I have an a/c electric water heater programed as a dump load for excess solar and wind. It gradually increases current to the water heater element starting @ 27.5V and ramping up to 100% of 2000 watts at 28V. This, along with standard ac loads, has been effective.
Right now it is producing 28 watts at at 27.5V at 3mph wind speed according to my clamp meter and home weather station.
Click to expand...

This is the exact unit I have. The most I've seen it produce is 221w. The included charge controller brakes it at 14.3v or 28.7v (it's always outgunned by the SCCs). It needs a much bigger tail to stay in the wind, otherwise the blades act as a vain as well in turbulant wind and casuing it to spend more time rotating back and forth instead of spinning.

I can't really comment on it's annual production because I can't say I had it mounted in an optimal position not to receive turbulent wind. I have recently moved house though and have a 4m high shed on the highest point of land for as far as I can see, when I was on the shed roof putting up the solar panels I noticed a strong constant wind current, I think the turbine will do well on the new shed, I just haven't put it up yet.

I would like to try a 5 blade model as well at some point
 
Last edited:
Hedges said:
Miles per hours is good, but my point is that linear "mean" average isn't weighted in a way that relates to power production.
The average would need to be of speed raised to the power of 3, because power production is proportional to that.


1 mile per hour average and constant 1 mph 24 hours day won't produce anything from a turbine, and energy theoretically available is proportional to 24 x 1^3 = 24 <something> units. and 1 mph average.

0 miles per hour 23 hours followed by 24 miles per hour would make power, energy proportional to 1 x 24^3 = 13,824 <something> units. but 1 mph average.

The latter is 576 times greater.
I think it is same has having a constant speed of (24^3/24)^(1/3) = 8.3 mph (not "average" of 1 mph)
Click to expand...
Okay, I'm tracking you now. One would think that kind of information would be compiled from the official wind stations and a true power generation average for a given site would be available. Does that kind of database exist?
 
pollenface said:
It needs a much bigger tail to stay in the wind
Click to expand...
This was my first one. It was a 5 blade turbine (supposedly) rated for 1200 watts. After weeks of wind tunnel testing, my engineering team devised this tail extension. It helped so much that the 16 ga. wiring in the slipring had a meltdown during a windstorm.:cool:

20221025_125815[1].jpg
 
HighDesertOffgrid said:
I would go as far to say that any wind DOES NOT makes sense as an ALTERNATIVE to solar at the present (except in Fairbanks, AK maybe). It has no place in any grid tied system for financial ROI. As a supplement to solar in off grid applications it may have a place because it is hard to put a monetary value on the ability to make coffee with your batteries before sunrise. ;)
Click to expand...
Yeah that's what I said. Lol

There really needs to be a flow chart for small wind.

Step 1 - Do you want to save money or want to watch something spinning?

I think it's pretty clear where the flow chart goes from there.
 
Last edited:
HighDesertOffgrid said:
I would go as far to say that any wind DOES NOT makes sense as an ALTERNATIVE to solar at the present (except in Fairbanks, AK maybe). It has no place in any grid tied system for financial ROI. As a supplement to solar in off grid applications it may have a place because it is hard to put a monetary value on the ability to make coffee with your batteries before sunrise. ;)
Click to expand...
In my scenario I have no more space for solar. My roof is already packed with them.
I am prepping for doomsday so I am not really concerned with ROI. I realize not everyone can do that at the moment so that is why I hope that once I have something spinning and producing then it could be copy paste for all of us here and for us to bypass all the trail and error costs. However little it produces.

Is that something you could get behind or even in such a scenario you are still leaning towards better not to go wind?
 
brandnewb said:
Is that something you could get behind or even in such a scenario you are still leaning towards better not to go wind?
Click to expand...
Sure. I would get behind that, once there was a working prototype that produced substantial power. Until then, I would probably build one of these.
 
HighDesertOffgrid said:
Sure. I would get behind that, once there was a working prototype that produced substantial power. Until then, I would probably build one of these.
Click to expand...
incredible!! this is the first time I see a vertical wind turbine spin slowly yet produce something worthwhile. did I miss the part in where the alternator is detailed?
 
brandnewb said:
incredible!! this is the first time I see a vertical wind turbine spin slowly yet produce something worthwhile. did I miss the part in where the alternator is detailed?
Click to expand...

That is a horizontal wind turbine, and it's massive. It's 2X the diameter of the typical micro HAWT.

113 sqft swept area.

There's a link in the description:

renewablesystemstechnology.com

How I Built A 3 kW Off Grid Wind Turbine

James Biggar Founder, builder
renewablesystemstechnology.com
 
Apparently this is a commercial project as I need to buy the project plans. Perhaps I did not look hard enough.

In any case 15$ is not too much though if indeed it does as advertised. Is there anyone that can confirm the real world readiness of it?

I mean 3KW in an alternator that size is, for me, ground breaking technology.

But here comes the sad part. Even if it would hold up to scrutiny then a 3.7m wing diameter is not something I can get away with due to my local code restrictions.

The skystream 3.7 is of similar nature though and has been thoroughly tested in the field under optimum conditions. The results in that test are less than that seems to be suggested by this seller.
I have here an overview
EDIT: I made a screenshot of the data in case the link goes offline
1666952418684.png

I could be wrong though that I just did not interpret everything correctly.

All in all I am not certain, due to the many scams out there, that this turbine is for real.
 
Last edited:
I use this calculator to try and come to anything meaningful
www.omnicalculator.com

Wind Turbine Calculator

The wind turbine calculator finds the power output, efficiency, RPM, torque, and revenue of a wind turbine (either HAVT or VAWT).
www.omnicalculator.com www.omnicalculator.com

if I did the input values correctly it shows 109 watts at 4 m/s
 
also, I am willing to pay that dude a huge amount of money if his plans and turbine hold up to scrutiny, become open source and are 'easily' build able for anyone.
 
brandnewb said:
btw, if the law allows it and you guys are interested I am willing to spend 15$ on yet another scam and share the plans of it here
Click to expand...
That’s thievery
brandnewb said:
also, I am willing to pay that dude a huge amount of money if his plans and turbine hold up to scrutiny, become open source and are 'easily' build able for anyone.
Click to expand...
That’s a better plan
 
brandnewb said:
also, I am willing to pay that dude a huge amount of money if his plans and turbine hold up to scrutiny, become open source and are 'easily' build able for anyone
Click to expand...
It's appears to be very similar to the home built turbine plans that High Piggott has given workshops on building a 20 years or more. Very solid turbines. Smaller rotors to alternators ratio is the key I believe. Speaking very roughly and not based on anything other than I interpreted from something Hugh wrote... put a 1000 watt rotor on a 2000 alternator vs. most commercial small wind turbines are putting 2000 watt rotors on 2000 watt alternators lead to turbine that will last a long time.

I suspect there are some things that most people could do in thier garage with basics tools and lots of time. Then are are other things, like the blades that will stop most people from building thier own wind turbine in thier garage.

There was a company in Colorado that was building the blades and supplying some of the others part to compliment Hugh's plans. They appear to be gone now as I full intended to buy a "kit" then collect the others locally.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
AWP wind turbine barn find, hydro prognosis, and what to do with my A.R.E. turbine
Replies
0
Views
352
Ptom
P
Alexander
Are small wind turbines really worth it?
Replies
3
Views
660
Alexander
Alexander
Alexander
Are small wind turbines worth it?
Replies
5
Views
689
RaySE
RaySE
T
Seplos Mason 48 volt 135 AH DIY kit - Build and operation report
Replies
12
Views
3K
lrogle
L

diy solar

diy solar
Back
Top