North CarolinaWhat state are you in? Those are rough regulations.
North CarolinaWhat state are you in? Those are rough regulations.
This is where the details get a little complicated. A GT inverter is an MPPT device that will produce as much AC power as it can at any given moment based on solar conditions and what the PV's can deliver. GT inverters are also UL1741 (SA) compliant which means they only operate between specified voltage and frequency ranges which are fairly narrow. (The SA designation includes some ride through provisions but that is off topic)I don't plan on selling anything back, I don't plan on the local or federal gov having anything to do with my solar install at all. The PV inverter was going to inject AC right on the output bus to the panel along with the xw or into it's own sub panel. Are you saying there's zero way to not back feed into the grid with the PV inverter? As long as my meter doesn't roll backwards and I'm not backfeeding to hurt a lineman I don't see them caring.
That's a surprise, NC doesn't often get accused of being left wing communist...
Almost like it's capitalism at work; if they can make money from your power, the company will. Even if that means passing regulations and making excuses to make it look legit.
Communism would be allowing you to make power but forcing you to share it (possibly equally) with the neighbors.
To the OP, are you looking to be grid tied with an AC coupled Schneider?
There's a weak link in that exact combo: the Schneider won't charge your battery from excess PV when the grid is present. If there's no grid input, then the Schneider will suck up 6 or 6.8kw from the AC coupled solar.
I've got my Schneider set to work AC coupled and grid tied, but it required an external controller. I use a raspberry pi, another member here uses a small industrial PLC.
Depending on your usage profile, DC coupled or a mix of AC and DC, might be a better fit.
Do you use significantly more energy while the sun is out? If so, AC coupling is more efficient as the daytime power it's converted down to lower DC voltage, then back up to higher AC voltage.
But, if you're looking to power the heaters and house overnight, DC coupled is likely better as it can charge the battery more efficiently.
This is one of my main concerns, the article said what you just stated. The PV AC has to go somewhere and it's to the loads or battery. I understand now how it makes it to the battery..you said it back feeds through the bettery inverters. So, the AC is back fed and converted to DC and pushed into the battery? What if the battery is full? What if the air conditioner is on and pulling a decent load and then goes off..all that incoming AC has to go somewhere. The article said that's where phase shifting was suppose to come in and shut the pv inverter off or throttle it down. The article said this could take some time and might be too long if the batteries are full and you risk blowing up batteries.This is where the details get a little complicated. A GT inverter is an MPPT device that will produce as much AC power as it can at any given moment based on solar conditions and what the PV's can deliver. GT inverters are also UL1741 (SA) compliant which means they only operate between specified voltage and frequency ranges which are fairly narrow. (The SA designation includes some ride through provisions but that is off topic)
When a GT inverter is AC coupled with a grid forming, battery inverter at the AC Output, the power from the GT inverter has to go somewhere. Somewhere being the loads on the subpanel with any excess power Backfeeding into the Battery Inverter. There are 2 possible states of operation.
1) Grid is functional and connected to the AC Input of the Battery Inverter and the Inverter has qualified the power and Closed the transfer relay.
2) Grid is down completely or out of tolerance in voltage or frequency and the Inverter has disqualified power and Opened the transfer relay.
In case 1, excess production from the GT inverters goes out to the grid (more likely your neighbors house) Your meter doesn't register the credit and the excess power is lost. Worst case scenario the meter detects backfeed and sends a message to the utility if its one of the newer electronic communicating meter. Operating without an approval could get their attention.
In case 2, excess production from the GT inverters goes through the grid forming Inverter built in AC charger to the batteries. When the batteries hit full voltage setting the Inverter ramps up frequency and the GT inverters will begin to curtail their output and eventually shut down at 60.5Hz.
Sol-Ark has a nice feature where AC Coupling can be done via the Generator Input on the Inverter thus it is better suited to regulating the AC Coupled inverters. I have no idea how sophisticated the Sol-Ark firmware is but its unlikely that you could achieve true 0 export because of the lag between sensing exported power and reaction as well as rather course increments of curtailment with GT inverters.
Are you planning to turn off/open the grid connection other than those times when production is low? If not, and you don't want/can't backfeed the grid, then either you'll need to program something to speak Modbus and command the AC charging or the XW isn't the correct choice.I have not decided on a inverter yet, I was looking at the xwpro or radian 8048. I plan on having a traditional system as in two inverters with two charge controllers and a rack of batteries with a ground mounted solar array. I will have grid connection to the inverters for grid assist and charging of batteries when there's no sun.
It's hot here too, those 100+ degree days all summer really suck down a lot of juice!But, in Texas we run the AC all day in the summer.
Yup, using more power when the sun is up makes AC coupled more efficient. It won't help on those days when the AC runs all night, but that's what the battery and DC panels are for.The article said PV AC is more efficient in this case.
That ratio is a hard number to nail down.So, I was trying to find out how to add a little PV AC into the mix for assisting with running the conditioner and a few other things and do it correctly. I would be AC/DC coupled I think.
I've got a net metering agreement, but I can run the AC and most everything in the house on the XW when the grid goes down.I do not want to send anything back to the grid. And, should the grid be down I'd still like to be able to use the PV AC and the incoming DC to the charge controllers.
CorrectAs stated it appears the way to achieve this is to couple it to the AC output side of the battery inverters and injecting AC right along that bus into the loads panel. I'm assuming the AC output from the xwpro keeps the PV inverter from shutting down...a false grid?
The XW (and Radian) has relays that will disconnect from the grid if the grid goes out of spec (high voltage, low voltage, high frequency, low frequency)It shouldn't back feed like this right?
Yes that's correct. You'd then add a charge controller and PV connected to the battery.
Yup, the inverter turns into a charger and the home loads stay on, powered by PV.This is one of my main concerns, the article said what you just stated. The PV AC has to go somewhere and it's to the loads or battery. I understand now how it makes it to the battery..you said it back feeds through the bettery inverters. So, the AC is back fed and converted to DC and pushed into the battery?
You don't run the battery up to 100%What if the battery is full? What if the air conditioner is on and pulling a decent load and then goes off..all that incoming AC has to go somewhere. The article said that's where phase shifting was suppose to come in and shut the pv inverter off or throttle it down. The article said this could take some time and might be too long if the batteries are full and you risk blowing up batteries.
EG4 things their batteries do, I haven't seen success stories here, just complaints. But that's all anyone comes here for when EG4 or Signature Solar is involved.In case 2, that means the batter inverters has to be able to read he state of charge for the batteries ..right? If this is true I'm assuming you can't use batteries that don't have the proper communication. I don't think EG4 or Trophy batteries communicate with xwpro or radian.
Thanks for this input. I don't have a loads audit yet, I've been looking at the following to achieve this on a overall big picture level and per circuit level. This should allow me to clamp onto the mains and a individual circuit. The AC is a typical Train 4ton unit. I have a killowatt but don't have a way of looking at the large appliances. What do you think of the item below? *Another question...when the battery inverter phase shifts to shutdown the PV inverter does the change in frequency and voltage have a effect on other things connected in the panel such as computers?Are you planning to turn off/open the grid connection other than those times when production is low? If not, and you don't want/can't backfeed the grid, then either you'll need to program something to speak Modbus and command the AC charging or the XW isn't the correct choice.
It's hot here too, those 100+ degree days all summer really suck down a lot of juice!
Yup, using more power when the sun is up makes AC coupled more efficient. It won't help on those days when the AC runs all night, but that's what the battery and DC panels are for.
That ratio is a hard number to nail down.
What does your AC consume?
What are your base loads?
Have you decided on a total PV or have a rough idea?
I've got a net metering agreement, but I can run the AC and most everything in the house on the XW when the grid goes down.
Correct
The XW (and Radian) has relays that will disconnect from the grid if the grid goes out of spec (high voltage, low voltage, high frequency, low frequency)
Yes that's correct. You'd then add a charge controller and PV connected to the battery.
I really like the next diagram down in that sheet, it gives an example of current flow when off grid.
View attachment 143074
Yup, the inverter turns into a charger and the home loads stay on, powered by PV.
You don't run the battery up to 100%
If you stop at 90 or 95% that should give you enough wiggle room to absorb the excess PV while the AC coupled inverter ramps down.
EG4 things their batteries do, I haven't seen success stories here, just complaints. But that's all anyone comes here for when EG4 or Signature Solar is involved.
You can also use battery voltage to regulate how the XW handles charging/discharging.
That's what I am doing, but my batteries are not Lifepo4, NMC has a much more linear voltage to SOC relationship.
You could set it to stop charging when AC coupled at 3.4 volts per cell.
I do know that with my Enphase micros there is a way to limit export to zero but CT placement is critical when also used with a hybrid inverter.Are you saying there's zero way to not back feed into the grid with the PV inverter?
Oh they care, but I agree with you that there is nothing that I know of that prevents us from generating our own electricity in most cases. It may require a building permit as would any new circuitAs long as my meter doesn't roll backwards and I'm not backfeeding to hurt a lineman I don't see them caring.
I've heard good things about the Iotawatt. It would do a great job of providing that load and usage info.Thanks for this input. I don't have a loads audit yet, I've been looking at the following to achieve this on a overall big picture level and per circuit level. This should allow me to clamp onto the mains and a individual circuit. The AC is a typical Train 4ton unit. I have a killowatt but don't have a way of looking at the large appliances. What do you think of the item below?
Most of them don't care. If you have clocks on AC power, they might loose time. But many electrical devices are designed with a wide frequency range in mind (50-60 hz)*Another question...when the battery inverter phase shifts to shutdown the PV inverter does the change in frequency and voltage have a effect on other things connected in the panel such as computers?
Until then, I will continue to use the grid as a resource. It is an efficient seasonal battery to complement my 42 kWh pack and hybrid grid interactive system. I do agree with your view of the future and feel fortunate to have locked in some benefits before they were eroded.I don't think it is wise to design a system today that uses the grid, there are some benefits but those are quickly going down or will soon be manipulated to no longer be a benefit.
Currently my area supports hourly rate power. It's never a benefit for me to push power to the grid in these situations. I almost always charge my house batteries at night some even if I don't need it because often the power is either very cheap so why not, or its even free or negative, meaning I get paid for taking power from the grid. I expect these benefits to go away at some point but yea the ~20% loss treating keeping things as AC coupled for solar to a house battery to me is very wasteful in that case.Until then, I will continue to use the grid as a resource. It is an efficient seasonal battery to complement my 42 kWh pack and hybrid grid interactive system. I do agree with your view of the future and feel fortunate to have locked in some benefits before they were eroded.
I think the term AC coupling has different meanings depending on your perspective. I think the intent of the OP in framing the question in the title was fairly specific to the question of AC coupled solar and a hybrid inverter. In my case I would not even know how to quantify the waste since I think in terms of AC .keeping things as AC coupled for solar to a house battery to me is very wasteful in that case.
That is one good aviator… and message .. go Bundy…!I don't plan on selling anything back, I don't plan on the local or federal gov having anything to do with my solar install at all. The PV inverter was going to inject AC right on the output bus to the panel along with the xw or into it's own sub panel. Are you saying there's zero way to not back feed into the grid with the PV inverter? As long as my meter doesn't roll backwards and I'm not backfeeding to hurt a lineman I don't see them caring.
You'll have a difficult time powering them all a differing voltages. Sure, if you are in an RV, with limited roof space, it makes sense to run as much as possible on 12 v. But if this is a house with all the normal junk around the house, it's impractical. I'm not running 12 v to my TV, 19 volts to the media stuff, 5 volts to the USB alarm clock...3.) If you want MOST things actually are DC not AC(not that most of us would be you could run most things without ever converting to AC)
Wut? Do you mean something other than electrical/efficiency loses? My AC PV inverter is listed at 99% efficient. Hard to beat that when going straight to the load.4.) There are massive losses in being AC Coupled(which I think is really the main reason)
That's a valid reason why they are so common, but not the only reason.The only reason we have these AC coupled systems mostly is because of the grid and selling power back to the grid.
My original thought was to supplement a traditional style solar system by injecting solar generate AC current into the loads panel along with the battery inverters AC being injected. This thought came about after reading how much more efficient AC derived from a solar inverter was compared to converting DC to AC. Since I run a air conditioner all day during the summer I thought supplementing the load with a solar inverter for daytime usage might be worth looking at. I've learned throughout this thread what I really meant was AC/DC coupled. I'm debating if it's worth the trouble for me!
I'm not sure how to frame this question so I'll do my best. Can you split the output from a single PV source to both charge controllers and a PV inverter? I plan on having, in the end, one large array south facing and one medium array west facing. I plan on combining these arrays in a combiner box and feeding it to the inverters. Can I split out the output from the combiner box to both the charge controllers and PV inverter? I was thinking once the batteries are full the charge controllers would shut down but the pv inverter would still be able to use the pv input and inject ac. What I'm trying to achieve is using the same arrays for both the charge controllers and pv inverter. It seems like the sunny boy or island might allow this. Do you have any input on sungrow pv inverters? A video I watched said that SMA was making there stuff in China now and sungrow was their competitor which seems to have high ratings.AC coupling is ideal for that. And you get the GT PV inverter's kW capacity in addition to your battery inverter; that is typically sitting at zero, so full surge capability available.
If grid is connected and you don't want to backfeed, the two choices are disconnecting from grid and ramping up frequency, or having communication with the inverter. SMA supports SpeedWire (Ethernet) and some 3rd-party meter with CT for their later models.
Alternative, put a slightly undersized GT PV system behind the air conditioner contactor. "Guerilla grid-tie", it would never export.
I tried that with 2 charge controllers fed in parallel from single PV array. One was Victron 150/60 charging 22V battery and another was Victron 75/15 charging 12V battery. During cloudy conditions the bigger 60 amp controller was being confused by competing MPPT algorithm from the smaller 15A controller. During full sun or when smaller 15A unit was maxed out the larger 60A unit did the tracking.Can you split the output from a single PV source to both charge controllers and a PV inverter?
If I'm understanding you correctly I'd just forgo SCC's and use the PV inverter in place? If that's the case I'd just split my arrays and have each one feeding a PV inverter installed at the array location, ground mounted, and then feed this back to the battery inverters. It seems I'd be able to supply direct AC for loads, charge batteries and use smaller wires ..saving money. Are these assumptions correct? What are the downsides not using a DC SCC?In general you can't connect more than one SCC or PV inverter to a single PV array, but there might be ways to get away with it.
Newer inverters are transformerless, and PV+/PV- are driven to voltages related to AC line voltage peaks. Can't load that toward any DC voltage. Also can't load with much capacitance (only some PV panel types are compatible.)
Transformer type inverters have PV array either positive ground or negative ground. Some sort of ground-fault mechanism, such as a fuse or breaker which bonds PV- (usually) to ground. If you load toward a DC voltage, that will trip.
Some isolated/floating devices might operate in parallel. For instance if you got an isolated DC/DC converter you could connect it to one more more PV panels of a string to get desired voltage, and it would deliver isolated DC power. I kind of doubt any SCC would work like that, but possibly.
If you do have two MPPT operating in parallel they will probably confuse each other.
You could mechanically switch the array. Such DC voltage relays are going to be difficult to find. Manually, you can swap MC connectors or any switch rated AC or DC for the voltage, so long as no current flow. My idea is MC3 connectors inside disconnect switch with locking lid.
What I would do is just have the array go to GT PV inverter, let island-forming inverter AC couple to it and charge battery.
You can also have more panels DC coupled. I've tried a couple, experimenting, but that's not part of my system for now.