Sorry to resurrect this thread as my first post but this is an extremely useful thread and I wanted to add something. My county (Nevada County, California) building department confirmed with me today after a very interesting phone call that I could become a "qualified person" by completing an online NFPA 70E exam. This was at the suggestion of the inspector I was speaking with which I thought was rather nice. I went online and found a course with a certificate of completion for $45 (USD) and he looked at the website and ran it by his supervisor who said it was okay. They still want me to have a "licensed contractor"
design the plans which I thought was strange. Our
county off-grid solar handout states:
"System shall be
designed by a licensed solar contractor for residential projects and a licensed
electrical engineer for commercial projects."
I'm still somewhat confused as to the "designed" requirement -- this sounds to me like there will be the "contractor of record" which I didn't think was a thing. PE stamps make sense to me; it's being on the record and liable for E&O.
Another thing I'll point out is something the building department guy mentioned: "I remember the meetings about this and there were no homeowners in the room, just county and contractors."
Not surprising. Nothing against contractors but 1) there aren't many of them left and 2) they have a direct conflict of interest when it comes to prohibition of allowed owner-builder projects.
A California electrical engineer stamp will cost me $600. What's more troubling about this is that the EG4 6000XP has even fewer connections; most of the engineering here has already been done by the manufacturer (and certified by UL). Conductor sizing and conduit fill is prescriptive. It seems like forcing me to hire a contractor would be in violation of some state or federal law.
Again, I thought only a water well required a licensed contractor (which makes sense to me).