You continue to ignore the math and references that prove otherwise, so there's not much new to say.
What math and science? The same one that gave us safe and effective vax? How can we believe "math and science" when it has been severely compromised by by special interest and anyone dissenting in the field has been ostracized? The entire "climate change" math relies on incorrect assumptions, and the entire data model has been proved to be false time and time again.
Just like with vaccines. Its the same exact thing.
Aha, and that renewables are not enough to sustain demand. (They have been shattering their traditional energy generation for years, hence they are in doodoo)What the EU found out is it is silly to be dependent on oil from an irresponsible country.
Why would you have to pay 5x as much for renewables? Do the math. It's cheaper. Or explain why the math from the last post you ignored is wrong:
It is most definitely not cheaper when everything is taken into account. This has been broken down time and again, but you ignore all of it. But no need to argue at all with all the "math and science"... reality is EU is paying significantly higher rates, and places like Cali are having brownouts and blackouts.
More often than not you'll find my arguments use today's numbers and tech with the caveat that scientific advances will only make it better.
For example, the math above has nothing pie-in-the-sky about it.
With today's tech, using renewables such as Solar and Wind and current battery tech is completely and totally unsustainable unless you send 90% of people to stone age living standards.