I am concerned the breakers state in the specs, max volts dc 125V and the sticker on the breaker says 150V...Some midnite circuit breaker porn while we wait for release.
View attachment 197056View attachment 197057View attachment 197058
I am concerned the breakers state in the specs, max volts dc 125V and the sticker on the breaker says 150V...Some midnite circuit breaker porn while we wait for release.
View attachment 197056View attachment 197057View attachment 197058
Yeah not sure what's going on there but it's apparently good to go for the full 150V when used in a midnite enclosure.I am concerned the breakers state in the specs, max volts dc 125V and the sticker on the breaker says 150V...
I'm not sure I'd give that even an R Rating.Some midnite circuit breaker porn while we wait for release.
View attachment 197056View attachment 197057View attachment 197058
One of the reasons I went with midnite breakers. They will work if and when needed.This one might have been X, if they'd had the foresight to video it:
Instead, as prose like "Lady Chatterly's Lover", it is pretty tame by modern standards.
Yes manufactured by Carling.Are those Carling Tech breakers?
Sounds like a Darwin award is in your future.Mnpv6 arrived.
Anyone know if I can cut the bus bar in half and run three breakers to two Victron SCCs (150/35)? Basically can the Victrons handle a common negative bus when running in parallel? I've seen where the Midnite classics can but nothing on the Victrons. Thanks.
If it's an issue I guess I can always combine the negatives of the second array separately from the first array.Well it could if both are on common negative but this would be risky and unsafe and not code compliant.Not
To mention voiding warranty.
Because my non standard way is specifically shown as a valid configuration by midnite when using their classic controllers? And they show where to cut the bus bar in the manual? So really the only question is if the Victron SCCs behave the same way as the Midnite classics.Look, not to put too fine a point on it. You seemed to be worried about "Cheap Chinese breakers", then proceed to suggest getting creative by modifying a combiner box, and wiring things in a non-standard way. I think you'd have been better off with a couple of home-made DIN rail combiner boxes with "Cheap Chinese breakers" one for each string feeding the MPPT's. As long as your the only one who will ever mess with it, and 5 years from now when some esoteric problem comes up and you remember what you did it shouldn't be a problem sharing the negative, and cutting bus bars in a cabinet. I just can't imagine why you would want to even consider it after worrying about buying a premium branded circuit breaker.
Well then. . . If it's supported by the manufacturer of the combiner panel in their documentation, then your covered on the warranty side. As far as sharing the negative bus that should not really be an issue, but it should still be isolated from ground. I wouldn't do that, but the SCC's shouldn't care no matter the brand, as you shouldn't have a complete circuit to the other feed there should be no path.Because my non standard way is specifically shown as a valid configuration by midnite when using their classic controllers? And they show where to cut the bus bar in the manual? So really the only question is if the Victron SCCs behave the same way as the Midnite classics.
Because my non standard way is specifically shown as a valid configuration by midnite when using their classic controllers? And they show where to cut the bus bar in the manual? So really the only question is if the Victron SCCs behave the same way as the Midnite classics.
Well then. . . If it's supported by the manufacturer of the combiner panel in their documentation, then your covered on the warranty side. As far as sharing the negative bus that should not really be an issue, but it should still be isolated from ground. I wouldn't do that, but the SCC's shouldn't care no matter the brand, as you shouldn't have a complete circuit to the other feed there should be no path.