12VoltInstalls
life passes by too quickly to not live in freedom
I think they should simultaneously open up what types of firearms you can own, but simply have more stringent requirements in proportion for the potential danger of the weapon to the public,
So after the Iraq war, the 2008 financial crises, Covid, and now Ukraine (never mind the scandal in the white house) you trust the government who is run by people who don’t have the first clue about firearms or crime statistics to administer laws effectively and fairly? When by its very description your ‘proportion for the potential danger’ implies the inanimate device not the human is responsible for its level of ‘danger’ and that’s the basis of the effective freedom you desire? The government is able to tell citizens how to effectively control ‘potential’ gun violence? Just like they control potential rapists or potential felony drunk driving?
This is totally off topic for sure and not something we should discuss here at all. But dang - I wish for the world’s sake that “more stringent requirements” would stop criminal actors from committing crimes. Obeying the law is voluntary. If one is disinclined to follow the law and societal moral codes a bad actor isn’t going to say to himself, “oh! A new law! I guess I won’t kill anyone today!”
I don’t want to get in any trouble here but this subject concerns me. More laws don’t stop criminals, nutcases, political bad actors (nor those that emotionally/cognitively should not have access to many, many things including firearms).
In every aspect of our lives abdication of reason can lead us into false security, and substituting informed safety with government oversight is mentally, willfully “checking out” and deluding ourselves that the government will act in our best interests. They won’t. They’ll merely act to keep their seat on their own personal gravy train.