not paranoid, just familiar with the bad reputation skf has among members hereIt for real, no on ai. Are you parnoid or is this the way you suggest the comment are not honest. This forum is proving to be odd
You've only got 5 posts, and all seem to be praising SFK. That would be fine, but you've only said you have ordered a battery from them and not received it yet. What all have you purchased, received, and tested from them previously that has you so convinced they are so much better than everyone else?I have been dealing with SFK for awhile and always got replies and solutions to all my questions. I can see other brand sponsers attacking SFK as SFK can be a serious competitor and set a new standard, that is lacking with others.
i suggest you take a look at youtube, channel "ray build cool stuff" ( a fellow member hete) and look at his video's , especially the one where skf threatens him, when they dont agree with his evaluation of their stuff.I also have a SFK v3 kit with the 280K cells from them. It was with there 150A bms. I DID NOT use the active balancer, but have since attached it and can not tell a difference in balancing so I don't think it is necessary or harmful. I have been very happy with the results. I can use both the xoaxing app or the SFK app to view the battery.
I did not get 280AH from there cells though, but 278, I would suppose the BMS used 2 AH possibly 3 AH. The sfk app has a testing feature which basically eliminates the need for capacity tester. These are my results: https://www.sunfunkits.com/app/ViewBenchmarkDetails?id=6bc89774f0f4 the cells are very closely matched so maybe this is why I don't think a active balancer is needed.
After seeing Brad Cagle's review I will be ordering some of the REPT 280 cells from and a v4 kit when it arrives.
On a side note I think SFK is bashing grade B too hard and making up claims that don't hold up to what they say, recently Andy from off grid garage did a review on the there cells and while it did pass capacity and it had in tact QR code, the Htihium grade B cell was just as good and cheaper in terms of capacity. So they could do themselves a favor and just stay out of the grade A vs grade B debate.
But I have read these forums for years and only registered this year, what these Chinese sellers send to these influencers and what everyone else gets that is not a YouTube is completely different. So for my piece of mind I will pay the premium for sales with the test report just to not have to deal with the stress.
Yes, I have watched Cagle and most of off grid garage. There are several things that even today, I don't agree with off grid garage (minor stuff).I also have a SFK v3 kit with the 280K cells from them. It was with there 150A bms. I DID NOT use the active balancer, but have since attached it and can not tell a difference in balancing so I don't think it is necessary or harmful. I have been very happy with the results. I can use both the xoaxing app or the SFK app to view the battery.
I did not get 280AH from there cells though, but 278, I would suppose the BMS used 2 AH possibly 3 AH. The sfk app has a testing feature which basically eliminates the need for capacity tester. These are my results: https://www.sunfunkits.com/app/ViewBenchmarkDetails?id=6bc89774f0f4 the cells are very closely matched so maybe this is why I don't think a active balancer is needed.
After seeing Brad Cagle's review I will be ordering some of the REPT 280 cells from and a v4 kit when it arrives.
On a side note I think SFK is bashing grade B too hard and making up claims that don't hold up to what they say, recently Andy from off grid garage did a review on the there cells and while it did pass capacity and it had in tact QR code, the Htihium grade B cell was just as good and cheaper in terms of capacity. So they could do themselves a favor and just stay out of the grade A vs grade B debate.
But I have read these forums for years and only registered this year, what these Chinese sellers send to these influencers and what everyone else gets that is not a YouTube is completely different. So for my piece of mind I will pay the premium for sales with the test report just to not have to deal with the stress.
I certainly hope it doesn't kick in at 3V. That is not a good balancer strategy. If it is really a smart BMS, I would hope you would be able to set the balance limit voltage, which should be at around 3.4V.SFK is a smart bms and acitve balancer kick in around 3vdc, if i remember right. more or less
Unless they've changed their product line, the only active balancers I remember seeing from SFK were the always-on dumb capacitor-based ones from Heltec. Probably not a good idea, as you probably already have seen if you've watched off-grid garage.I got one of SFK active balancer, with the plan to install in my sok206
I still don't get how you can say this if all you have done is order it. As of yet you don't have it, but you think you found the battery you've always wanted?Too early to say this is final, but I think I may found the batteries that meets everything that I wanted in a battery.
yes, true, but i have played with it with an friend who has them. Which is why I switch. I notice lot of video on this battery, they show the balance and dead on, even after discharge and charge. I made a point of looking at balancing, even if it wasn't their theme, but they display the screen.I certainly hope it doesn't kick in at 3V. That is not a good balancer strategy. If it is really a smart BMS, I would hope you would be able to set the balance limit voltage, which should be at around 3.4V.
Unless they've changed their product line, the only active balancers I remember seeing from SFK were the always-on dumb capacitor-based ones from Heltec. Probably not a good idea, as you probably already have seen if you've watched off-grid garage.
I still don't get how you can say this if all you have done is order it. As of yet you don't have it, but you think you found the battery you've always wanted?
Ok, I'll admit I have a bit of a bias. I have several of these, and had decided they were a good thing to add to my Overkill 8S BMS, and to have spares.. I was testing the system over a few weeks, including in cold temps. Then one day I opened the battery box to find that the cells were WAY out of balance. That is to say, one (or maybe two?) cells were dropping dangerously low, below 2.8V with the rest above 3.2V. Then I found that about half of the caps on the Hultec 8S capacitor balancer were rapidly approaching 100°C, too hot to touch. Yikes! I pulled the whole thing. That board had clearly failed and was taking my battery (and maybe my house) with it. Suffice it to say, I would *NEVER* trust these cheap little boards to be plugged into my battery without me checking multiple times per day.These little heltec style active balancers are not bad, I had 3 of them on my 3x 8s battery banks. I just left them connected. All cells would balance back up as long as you would do a full charge every now and then.
this is a nice video, they basically work based on how different the voltage is, if the voltage difference is low then they hard do anything at all. Its not like the JK where it makes you are getting 2amps.
I think the most I ever even measured was like 1.2 amps right as the cells began to top off.
I am curious as to what the DC Voltage rating of the caps are, for them to get hot it either due to over Voltage or reverse Voltage being applied to the caps, most of those caps are rated at 85c or 105c. I wish I can find the schematic of these Active Balancer board to see how they work.Ok, I'll admit I have a bit of a bias. I have several of these, and had decided they were a good thing to add to my Overkill 8S BMS, and to have spares.. I was testing the system over a few weeks, including in cold temps. Then one day I opened the battery box to find that the cells were WAY out of balance. That is to say, one (or maybe two?) cells were dropping dangerously low, below 2.8V with the rest above 3.2V. Then I found that about half of the caps on the Hultec 8S capacitor balancer were rapidly approaching 100°C, too hot to touch. Yikes! I pulled the whole thing. That board had clearly failed and was taking my battery (and maybe my house) with it. Suffice it to say, I would *NEVER* trust these cheap little boards to be plugged into my battery without me checking multiple times per day.
So I am NOT a fan of these $2.99 active balancers (cost of parts, not what we pay) because it almost wrecked my battery. Besides that, there were two other things I realized, back when I thought they might be good:
So, I'm not judging them harshly for no reason. To each his own.
- Balancing all the time is just a bad idea. If you have top-balanced cells, the balancer will work like hell to bottom balance them when the cells are low, and then work like hell to top-balance them the next time you charge. Meaning, it will be meaninglessly moving energy all day long as you cycle. Since those moves are clearly less than 100% efficient, you are losing energy from your battery. Moreover, it will defeat your careful top-balance the first time you get the cells towards the bottom end of the discharge curve. This was the crux of what Off-Grid Garage showed, if anyone wants to go watch his videos.
- They will virtually never balance at a meaningful current. The "2A" rating is assuming that there is a *HUGE* misbalance between cells. I measured less than1A when I intentionally created a 0.8V imbalance between two adjacent cells (2.5V and 3.3V). For smaller differences, the amount of current is proportionally smaller. This means that the passive balancing in something like the JBD/Overkill BMS is probably more effective.