Not sure if you had the job as lineman you would have that opinion....one of those should be to have tiny amounts of spurious backfeeding allowed.
Not sure if you had the job as lineman you would have that opinion....one of those should be to have tiny amounts of spurious backfeeding allowed.
Do you mind posting a wiring diagram on this setup? I mean the connections of your dry contact relay to the chargeverter.The Dry contacts control a relay on the chargeverter AC input.
It turns on at 48v. And the chargeverter is set at 48.3v. The chargeverter keeps the battery at 48,3v until the sun comes up. Solar begins charging and the chargeverter goes idle. Then the relay turns off at 50v.
I would probably follow the standard procedures to check that a line wasn't being backfed when working on it. More things than a grid tied / synced inverter can cause a line to be live in a power outage.Not sure if you had the job as lineman you would have that opinion.
The lineman, I am certain, ARE concerned about the lineman.The power companies aren't concerned about the lineman. They are concerned about their gravy train.
That would be super aggravating, as net exported power is still 0W.What's interesting is it says one or more phases, so that would imply that this can even detect imbalanced zero export, like 2 amps going out on one leg and 2 amps going in on the other. I believe some of these "zero export" modes on inverters do consider this a zero export state.
I understood any AIO that can do SUB/SBU grid mixing is paralleling to the grid, whether it allows for intentional export modes or not.But this is an AIO, why would it allow the relay to allow the inverter to parallel grid?
Tell that to the European countries that allow grid tied balcony solar of 800 watts or more with no inspections or permits, or, at most requiring a simple form that says you have one dropped off in the post. Do you honestly think they aren't as concerned or more about lineman safety in Europe than we are here in the States?The lineman, I am certain, ARE concerned about the lineman.
You can hate the "power companies" all you desire. Real people are working the lines and back feed is dangerous.
I'm not sure the Victron inverter/chargers are immune to it either.So my understanding is a Victron quattro or multiplus had a double throw, double pole internal switch to avoid this kind of problem of unexpected export. Do the aios not have this?
I did a video on this. It works great! I wish the chargeverters were less noisy.I do the same. But it's automatically controlled through the Dry contacts.
since mine are V1 I understand, but they are deep in the basementI did a video on this. It works great! I wish the chargeverters were less noisy.
In SUB mode, they do run in parallel with the grid. Similar to a grid-tied inverter.But this is an AIO, why would it allow the relay to allow the inverter to parallel grid?
It is not doing zero export
Now one question here is, why does S to U or U to S transition cause a transient? Are these AIOs set up as momentary parallel and nobody ever checked the receipts until the POCOs instituted aggressive checking? (Which required an agreement if you are under PG&E).
I thought SUB/SBU meant it does NOT mix and does NOT do grid assist/peak shaving and does NOT have the necessary inverter control to achieve this. Just a transfer switch to lock out the grid vs the inverterI understood any AIO that can do SUB/SBU grid mixing is paralleling to the grid, whether it allows for intentional export modes or not.
I could be wrong, but I believe it is inherently necessary.
The issue is that spurious feedback occurs regardless on many/all of these inverters if they are connected to the grid, UL1741 cert or not. Anything synced up with the grid for either UPS mode, power assist or intentional backfeed, leaks a tiny bit back onto it. UL1741 protects with anti-islanding which pretty much just cuts power export on grid down.. but it would still likely export for a second or a fraction of a second anyway when the grid fails.. it's nearly impossible not to.UL1741 certification is meant to provide that "no feedback" to grid occurs. are these inverters certified, or is the listing lacking something?
I don't have a diagram, but it's pretty simple.Do you mind posting a wiring diagram on this setup? I mean the connections of your dry contact relay to the chargeverter.
I don't have a diagram, but it's pretty simple.
The Dry contacts control the relay. And the relay controls the AC feeding the chargeverter.
I thought SUB/SBU meant it does NOT mix and does NOT do grid assist/peak shaving and does NOT have the necessary inverter control to achieve this. Just a transfer switch to lock out the grid vs the inverter
And when I say SUB/SBU I mean only one AC source can carry the load, with no blending. If the inverter cannot carry the load then the full grid can carry the load.
Otherwise, how the heck is everyone getting away with parallel operation?
However since these are inverter/chargers, when charging from grid the inverter hardware is connected albeit configured in charging mode
These are two different modes.I thought SUB/SBU
I don't mind the noise because it's rarely on.I did a video on this. It works great! I wish the chargeverters were less noisy.
Then he would have to replace it with https://us.growatt.com/products/spf-3500-5000-usLVM-ES SPF 3000TL does not have that UL1741 certification from its spec sheet