I have been researching LifePO4/solar components for some time now. One can get overload syndrome trying to nail down charging parameters, solar components etc. so I have tried to find common threads among the mountain of information, theories and personal preferences regarding this topic.
One such commonality I think I have found is that most feel the Victron products are of good quality. As such, I have pretty much decided on a Victron MPPT charge controller. However, I don't see many using the Victron BMS. Instead they choose REC, Orion, Overkill etc. and want it to "talk" to the Victron CC. I guess my question is; will the Victron BMS not "talk" to the Victron CC right out of the box? Is the Victron BMS somehow not thought of as highly as their other equipment?
What am I missing here? I see many, many battery builders using Victron CC but very few, if any, using their BMS. What is the reason for this? I would think if one put together an entire system (CC, BMS, Inverter) with Victron equipment it would all work flawlessly together. There has to be something I am missing. What is it?
One such commonality I think I have found is that most feel the Victron products are of good quality. As such, I have pretty much decided on a Victron MPPT charge controller. However, I don't see many using the Victron BMS. Instead they choose REC, Orion, Overkill etc. and want it to "talk" to the Victron CC. I guess my question is; will the Victron BMS not "talk" to the Victron CC right out of the box? Is the Victron BMS somehow not thought of as highly as their other equipment?
What am I missing here? I see many, many battery builders using Victron CC but very few, if any, using their BMS. What is the reason for this? I would think if one put together an entire system (CC, BMS, Inverter) with Victron equipment it would all work flawlessly together. There has to be something I am missing. What is it?